- PII
- S013216250009284-5-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S013216250009284-5
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 10
- Pages
- 95-105
- Abstract
Based on socio-economic statistics, the results of sociological surveys and analysis of the labor legislation of the Russian Federation the article shows that such a form of struggle for upholding one's rights as a classic strike is practically not feasible in the conditions of bureaucratic forms of conciliation procedures. Consideration of various alternative forms of strike nature as well as the author’s experience in organizing an work-to-rule strike, during which consulting and informational support were provided to the organizers of the action, lead to the conclusion that such protests are promising in Russia indirectly confirming growth of social and labor conflicts in Russia. At the same time this fact, which falls outside the field of view of modern legal norms, is inconvenient for employers as well hindering a constructive dialogue in society, when relations between business owners and wage labor still remain the prevailing form of labor relations. Hence, conclusion is suggested that it is indispensably to rethink the content of the concept of “strike” in the Labor Code of the Russian Federation, to regulate the procedures for announcing, holding and resolving protest actions, as well as labor law arising from it.
- Keywords
- strike action, Italian strike, labor law, social protest
- Date of publication
- 18.12.2020
- Year of publication
- 2020
- Number of purchasers
- 4
- Views
- 281
References
- 1. Bizyukov P.V. (2011). How to protect labor rights in Russia: collective labor protests and their role in regulating labor relations. Moscow: TsSTP. (In Russ.)
- 2. Bobkov V.N., Shichkin I.A., Simonova M.V., Loktyuhina N.V. (2020) Peculiarities of unstable employment in the era of a digital economy from data of social media of Russia. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 908: 235–243.
- 3. Gerasimova E.S. (2016) Collective labor disputes, strikes and protests in Russia: the impact of legislation and law enforcement practice on their prevalence and application. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law]. No. 9: 55–65. (In Russ.)
- 4. Gleeson Sh. (2016) Precarious Claims: The Promise and Failure of Workplace Protections in the United States. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
- 5. Gouldner A. (1965) Wildcat Strike. A Study in Worker. Management Relationships. London: Harper Torchbook.
- 6. Hiller A. (1969) The Strike. N.Y.: Arno.
- 7. Hyman R. (1989) The Sociology of Industrial Conflict. In: Strikes. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
- 8. Lyutov N.L. (2012) Why are there almost no legal strikes in Russia? Trudovoye pravo [Labor law]. No. 10: 9–22. (In Russ.)
- 9. Kalashnikov K.N., Sharov V.V. (2017) Labor relations in Russia: between partnership and confrontation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 73–81. (In Russ.)
- 10. Kozina I. (2009) The labor movement in Russia: the anatomy of a strike. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialnoy politiki [Journal of Social Policy Studies]. Vol. 7. No. 4: 485–502. (In Russ.)
- 11. Soifer V.G. (2008) Legal regulation of strikes needs to be changed. Trudovoye pravo [Labor law]. No. 7: 23–30. (In Russ.)
- 12. Soshnikova T.A. (2004) The right to individual and collective labor disputes. Zakonodatelstvo i ekonomika [Legislation and Economics]. No. 8: 58–63. (In Russ.)
- 13. The strike movement in the countries of the European Union (2019). St. Petersburg: SPbGUP. (Social and labor conflicts; Iss. 17). (In Russ.)
