Везде
THREATS OF ISOLATION OF RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY IN THE FUTURE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THREATS OF ISOLATION OF RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGY IN THE FUTURE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000330-0-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000330-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
SVETLANA MOROZOVA 
Abstract
It is given an objective analysis of the current state of the methodological crisis of world psychology.On the basis of current discussions, it is concluded that there is a number of issues that are not paid attentionto, but are of high importance and can predict the development of Russian psychology in the context of theworld psychology. These are issues such as problems of research replications, statistical inference, preparatorystage of articles publication, etc. It is necessary to increase the statistical literacy of the psychologicalcommunity in order to preserve the possibility to remain in the mainstream of the world psychologicalscience.
Keywords
methodology of psychology, methodological crisis, replication, statistical inference.
Number of purchasers
8
Views
441
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Ancupov A.Ja., Kandybovich S.L. Problemy prognoza
razvitija psihologii // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017.
V. 38. № 4. P. 109–114. (In Russian)
2. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A., Jurevich A.V. Prognoz razvitija
psihologicheskoj nauki i praktiki K 2030 G // Psikhologicheskii
zhurnal. 2016. V. 37. № 5. P. 45–64. (In Russian)
3. Korneev A.A., Rasskazova E.I., Krichevec A.N., Kojfman A.Ja.
Kritika metodologii proverki nulevoj gipotezy: ogranichenija
i vozmozhnye puti vyhoda. Chast' I // Psihologicheskie
issledovanija. 2016. V. 9. №. 45 [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL:
http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2016v9n45/1231-korneev45.
html. (data obrashhenija: 27.10.2017) (In Russian)
4. Fjodorov A.A. Privychka k krizisu // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal.
2017. V. 38. № 3. P. 129–132. (In Russian)
5. Benjamin D.J., Berger J.O., Johannesson M., Johnson V.E.
Redefine statistical significance // Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017.
[Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.nature.com/
articles/s41562-017-0189-z. (дата обращения: 27.10.2017)
6. Cooper H.M. Reporting Research in Psychology: How to
Meet Journal Article Reporting Standards / H.M. Cooper –
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2011.
P. 137.


7. Cooper L. Editorial // J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2016. V. 110. № 3.
С. 431–434.
8. Gigerenzer G. Mindless statistics // J. Socio. Econ. 2004. V. 33.
P. 587–606.
9. Gilbert D.T., King G., Pettigrew S., Wilson T.D. Comment on
“Estimatingthe reproducibility ofpsychological science” //
Science. 2016. V. 351. № 6277. P. 1037.
10. Kahneman D. A proposal to deal with questions about priming
effects // Nature. 2012. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://
proxy.library.spbu.ru:2332/polopoly_fs/7.6716.1349271308!/
suppinfoFile/Kahneman%25 20Letter.pdf. (data obrashhenija:
27.10.2017)
11. Killeen P.R. P rep , the Probability of Replicating an Effect
Hoboken // The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology.NJ, USA:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015. P. 1–8.
12. Lindsay D.S. Sharing Data and Materials in Psychological
Science // Psychol. Sci. 2017. V. 28. № 6. P. 699–702.
13. Lindsay D.S. Preregistered Direct Replications in Psychological
Science // Psychol. Sci. 2017. V. 28. № 9. P. 1191–1192.
14. Open Science Collaboration Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science // Science. 2015. P. 349.
№ 6251. P. aac4716.
15. Singh Chawla D. “One-size-fits-all” threshold for P values under fire // Nature. 2017. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature.2017.22625. (data
obrashhenija:27.10.2017)
16. Wagenmakers E.-J., Marsman M., Jamil T., Verhagen A. Ly J.,
Love J., Selker R., Gronau Q.F., Šmíra M., Epskamp S., Matzke D., Rouder J.N., Morey R.D. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications //
Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2017. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://
link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3. (data obrashhenija:
27.10.2017)
17. Wasserstein R.L., Lazar N.A. The ASA’s Statement on p-Values:
Context, Process, and Purpose // Am. Stat. 2016. P. 70. № 2.
P. 129–133.


18. Willkinson L. Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals:
Guidelines and Explanations // Am. Psychol. 1999. P. 54. № 8.
P. 594–604.
19. Woolston C. Psychology journal bans P values // Nature. 2015.
V. 519. № 7541. P. 9.
20. Publication manual of the American psychological association /
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2010.
21. Asa symposium on statistical inference. October 11–13, 2017.
Bethesda, Maryland [Электронныйресурс]. URL: http://
ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ssi/2017/index.cfm. (data obrashhenija: 27.10.2017)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate