Везде
MODERN FOREIGN RESEARCHES IN PSYCHOLOGY OF CONFLICTS IN SMALL GROUPS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MODERN FOREIGN RESEARCHES IN PSYCHOLOGY OF CONFLICTS IN SMALL GROUPS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000339-9-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
OLESYA SHIPITKO  A. Sidorenkov N. Ul'yanova
Abstract
The review of modern foreign publications on conflicts in small groups based on analysis of 76 scientific articles (10 - theoretical, 3 - meta-analytical and 63 - empirical) published in 12 leading international journals on social and organizational psychology in 2000 - 2015 is presented. The analysis has been done in the following categories: dynamics of publications, the author's structure of publications, genre of publications, types of groups under study, research methods and procedures, fields and subjects of researches. Uneven character of dynamics in publishing activity on intra- and inter-groups conflicts has been revealed. The main attention has been paid to interpersonal conflicts in group, fewer - to intergroup conflicts and minimum - to person-group conflicts. The study of correlation between interpersonal and intergroup conflict is singular. There are no publications on conflicts between informal subgroups in group, between parson and subgroup. Study of simultaneously several orientations of conflict is presented in a number of articles. Predictors and determinants of a conflict, conflict as predictor or determinant of something are the most frequent topics for interpersonal conflicts while conflict as a condition (background), behavior, reaction in conflict and management (settlement) of a conflict - for intergroup conflicts. Typological approach to interpersonal conflict study has been used in about 40% of publications. Laboratory, industrial and students groups are mainly the object of a study; data acquisition is carried out by means of laboratory experiments and questionnaires.
Keywords
small group, interpersonal conflict, intergroup conflict, group conflict
Date of publication
01.11.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
611
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000339-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 04.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Ageev V.S. Mezhgruppovoe vzaimodeistvie: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie problemy. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1990. (In Russian)
    2. 

  2. Grishina N.V. Psikhologiya konflikta. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2000. (In Russian)
    3. 

  3. Gulevich O.A. Psikhologiya mezhgruppovykh otnoshenii. Moscow: Izd-vo MPPI, 2007. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Dontsov A.I., Polozova T.A. Problema konflikta v zapadnoi sotsial'noi psikhologii // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1980. № 6. R. 119–133. (In Russian)
    5. 

  5. Latynov V.V. Konflikt: protekanie, sposoby razresheniya, povedenie konfliktuyushchikh storon (obzor zarubezhnykh rabot po psikhologii konflikta)  // Inostrannaya psikhologiya. 1993. № 2. R. 87–92. (In Russian)
    6. 

  6. Sosnin V.A. Issledovanie sotsial'nogo konflikta v sotsial'noi psikhologii SShA. Avtoref. diss. … k. psikhol. nauk. Moscow, 1979. (In Russian)
    7. 

  7. Ayoko O.B., Callan V.J., Härtel C.E.J. The influence of team emotional intelligence climate on conflict and team members’ reactions to conflict // Small Group Research. 2008. 39 (2). R. 121–149.
    8. 

  8. Balkundi P., Barsness Z., Michael J.H. Unlocking the influence of leadership network structures on team conflict and viability // Small Group Research. 2009. 40 (3). R. 301–322.
    9. 

  9. Behfar K.J. et al. Conflict in small groups: The meaning and consequences of process conflict // Small Group Research. 2011. 42 (2). R. 127–176.
    10. 

  10. Benard S. Cohesion from Conflict: Does intergroup conflict motivate intragroup norm enforcement and support for centralized leadership? // Social Psychology Quarterly. 2012. 75 (2). R. 107–130.
    11. 

  11. Bornstein G. Intergroup conflict: Individual, group, and collective interests // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2003. 7 (2). R. 129–145.
    12. 

  12. Chambers J.R., De Dreu C.K.W. Egocentrism drives misunderstanding in conflict and negotiation // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014. 51. R. 15–26.
    13. 

  13. Choi K., Cho B. Competing hypotheses analyses of the associations between group task conflict and group relationship conflict // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2011. 32. R. 1106–1126.
    14. 

  14. De Dreu C.K.W. Social value orientation moderates ingroup love but not outgroup hate in competitive intergroup conflict // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2010. 13 (6). R. 701–713.
    15. 

  15. De Dreu C.K.W., Beersma B. Conflict in organizations: Beyond effectiveness and performance  // European Journ. of Work and Organizational psychology. 2005. 14 (2). R. 105–117.
    16. 

  16. Frantz C.M., Bennigson C. Better late than early: The influence of timing on apology effectiveness // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2005. 41  (2). R. 201–207.
    17. 

  17. Gaunt R. Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations // Journ. of Applied Social Psychology. 2011. 41 (6). R. 1340–1355.
    18. 

  18. Gelfand M.J., Leslie L.M., Keller K.M. On the etiology of conflict cultures // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2008. 28. R. 137–166.
    19. 

  19. Goren H. The Effect of Out-group competition on individual behavior and out-group perception in the Intergroup Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) Game // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2001. 4 (2). R. 160–182.
    20. 

  20. Greer L.L., Jehn K.A., Mannix E.A. Conflict transformation: A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between different types of intragroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution // Small Group Research. 2008. 39 (3). R. 278–302.
    21. 

  21. Griffith T.L., Neale M.A. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2001. 23. R. 379–421.
    22. 

  22. Hempel P.S., Zhang Z.-X., Tjosvold D. Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2009. 30. R. 41–65.
    23. 

  23. Jehn K.A., Bendersky C. Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship  // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2003. 25. R. 187–242.
    24. 

  24. Jehn K.A., Bezrukova K. The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010. 112. R. 24–42.
    25. 

  25. Kamans E., Otten S., Gordijn E.H. Power and threat in intergroup conflict: How emotional and behavioral responses depend on amount and content of threat  // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2010. 14 (3). R. 293–310.
    26. 

  26. Kerwin S., Doherty A., Harman A. “It’s Not Conflict, It’s Differences of Opinion”: An in-depth examination of conflict in nonprofit boards // Small Group Research. 2011. 42 (5). R. 562–594.
    27. 

  27. Kotlyar I., Karakowsky L. Leading conflict? Linkages between leader behaviors and group conflict // Small Group Research. 2006. 37 (4). R. 377–403.
    28. 

  28. Lee T.L., Gelfand M.J., Kashima Y. The serial reproduction of conflict. Third parties escalate conflict through communication biases // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014. 54. R. 68–72.
    29. 

  29. Nijstad B.A., De Dreu C.K.W. Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects // Research in Org anizational Behavior. 2012. 32. R. 87–111.
    30. 

  30. Packer D.J. On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2008. 12 (1). R. 50–72.
    31. 

  31. Perlow L.A., Repenning N.P. The dynamics of silencing conflict // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2009. 29. R. 195–223.
    32. 

  32. Pluut H., Curşeu P.L. Perceptions of intragroup conflict: The effect of coping strategies on conflict transformation and escalation // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2012. 16 (4). R. 412–425.
    33. 

  33. Reedy J., Gastil J., Gabbay M. Terrorism and small groups: An analytical framework for group disruption // Small Group Research. 2013. 44 (6). R. 599–626.
    34. 

  34. Sanchez-Burks J. Protestant relational ideology: The cognitive underpinnings and organizational implications of an american anomaly // Research in Organizational Behavior. 2004. 26. R. 265–305.
    35. 

  35. Schlaerth A., Ensari N., Christian J. A meta-analytical review of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leaders' constructive conflict management // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2013. 16 (1). R. 126–136.
    36. 

  36. Somech A., Desivilya H.S., Lidogoster H. Team conflict management and team effectiveness: the effects of task interdependence and team identification // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2009. 30. R. 359–378.
    37. 

  37. Stephan W.G. Psychological and communication processes associated with intergroup conflict resolution // Small Group Research. 2008. 39 (1). R. 28–41.
    38. 

  38. Sullivan P.J., Feltz D.L. The relationship between intrateam conflict and cohesion within hockey teams // Small group research. 2001. 32 (3). R. 342–355.
    39. 

  39. Tjosvold D. The conflict-positive organization: It depends upon us  // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2008. 29. R. 19–28.
    40. 

  40. Tjosvold D., Wu P., Chen Y.F. The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision making: An experiment in China // Journ. of Applied Social Psychology. 2010. 40 (11). R. 2904–2926.
    41. 

  41. Yang J., Mossholder K.W. Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of intragroup emotional processing // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2004. 25. R. 589–605.
    42. 

  42. Zornoza A., Ripoll P., Peiru J.M. Conflict management in groups that work in two different communication contexts: Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication // Small group research. 2002. 33 (5). R. 481–508.
    43.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate