Везде
PSYCHOLOGY AND BIOPOLITICS: ABOUT PROSPECTS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCHES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PSYCHOLOGY AND BIOPOLITICS: ABOUT PROSPECTS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCHES
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000346-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Nadezhda Radina 
Abstract
Resources of Russian psychologists for creation of interdisciplinary projects in the sphere of biopolitics are considered. Biopolitics is regarded as scientific program and political practice as well. Activity of Russian researches in promotion of biopolitical conceptions is characterized in the context of history of development of biopolitical ideas. Theory of biopolitics is presented in three key aspects: biopolitics as a science about biological grounds of political and social; biopolitics as a special authoritative practice, as "privatization" of "naked life" or man's capital (Foucault's approach); biopolitics as an intersection of biological and political problems. Foucault's approach in biopolitics is analyzed, with man's capital being a key conception. According to the conception, psychological measurement of biopolitics that includes the analysis of roles of institutes of motherhood and family, education, culture in man's capital formation, study of person's migratory activity and inclination to innovations requires special attention. It is stressed that interdisciplinary projects in the sphere of biopolitics cannot claim to be exhaustive in case psychological measurements are excluded from them. At the same time, psychological researches in the sphere of biopolitics out of integration with other scientific disciplines risk become invisible for politicians and persons who mange problems at macrolevel.
Keywords
biopolitics, biopower, biomedical thechnologies, man’s capital, ethological approach
Date of publication
01.11.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
587
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Ababkov V.A., Voit T.S., Uraeva G.E., Schaboltas  A.V. Vlijanie kofeinsoderzhashhih napitkov i produktov na perenosimost’ povsednevnogo stressa [Effects of caffeine-containing drinks and foods on everyday stress tolerance]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektron. nauch. zhurn. 2013. V. 6. № 32. P. 4. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashhenija: 20.06.2015). (In Russian).
    2. 

  2. Agamben Dzh. Homo sacer. Suverennaja vlast’ i  golaja zhizn’. Per. s it. I. Levinoj, O. Dubickoj, P. Sokolova, M. Velizheva, S. Kozlova. M.: Evropa, 2011. (In Russian).
    3. 

  3. Alexander J.C., Kurakin D. Yu. Kul’turnaja travma i kollektivnaja identichnost’ [Cultural trauma and collective identity]. Sociologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. № 3. P. 6–40. (In Russian).
    4. 

  4. Bodrijjar Zh. Simvolicheskij obmen i smert’. Per. s fr. i vstup. st. S.N. Zenkina. Moscow: Dobrosvet, 2000. (In Russian).
    5. 

  5. Gagarin A.V. Vospitanie prirodoj. Nekotorye aspekty gumanizacii jekologicheskogo obrazovanija i  vospitanija. Moscow: Moskovskij gorodskoj psihologo-pedagogicheskij institut, 2000. (In Russian).
    6. 

  6. Glozman Zh.M. Formy i  metody oposredstvovanija v nejropsihologicheskoj reabilitacii i korrekcii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. V. 30. № 4. P.  87–91. (In Russian).
    7. 

  7. Deryabina O.M. Mesto psihologa v gosudarstvennoj i obshhestvennoj jekspertize [A Psychologist’s Place in the State and Social Expertise]. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2005. V 4. P. 17–46. (In Russian).
    8. 

  8. Deryabo S.D. Jekologicheskaja psihologija: diagnostika jekologicheskogo soznanija. Moscow: MPSI, 1999. (In Russian).
    9. 

  9. Egorova M.S. Pochemu polit-psihologicheskaja jekspertiza soobshhestvu “Deti-404” ne vyderzhivaet kritiki // Novaja gazeta. 08 janvarja 2015. URL: https:// www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/01/08/62563-pochemu-polit-psihologicheskaya-ekspertiza-soobschestvu-171-deti-404–187-ne-vyderzhivaet-kritiki (data obrashhenija 27.12.2016). (In Russian).
    10. 

  10. Egorova M.S., Chertkova Yu.D. Polimorfizm gena monoaminooksidazy (MAOA) i  variativnost’ psihologicheskih chert [MAOA polymorphism and variation in psychological traits]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. № 6(20). P. 14. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashhenija: 20.06.2015). (In Russian).
    11. 

  11. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V. Obrazovanie i konkurentosposobnost’ nacii: psihologicheskie aspekty. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. T. 30. № 1. P.  5–13. (In Russian).
    12. 

  12. Zub A.T. Biologija i politika (metodologicheskij analiz biopoliticheskoj issledovatel’skoj programmy). Dissertacija na soiskanie uch. st.d.biol.n. Moscow: MGU, 1994. (In Russian).
    13. 

  13. Ivanyushkin A. Ya., Ignat’ev V.N., Korotkih R.V., Siluyanova I.V., Tishhenko P.D., Yudin B.G. Vvedenie v biojetiku. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija, 1998. (In Russian).
    14. 

  14. Ivashhenko A.V., Panov V.I., Gagarin A.V. Jekologo orientirovannoe mirovozzrenie lichosti. Moscow: RUDN, 2008. (In Russian).
    15. 

  15. Kobylin I.I. Istok i  singuljarnost’: Dzh. Agamben i M. Fuko o rozhdenii biovlasti. Filosofija i obshhestvo. Moscow: Uchitel’, 2011. № 3. P. 171–183. (In Russian).
    16. 

  16. Kovaleva Ju.V., Sergienko E.A. Kontrol’ povedenija pri razlichnom techenii beremennosti [Control of behavior under different flow of pregnancy]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2007. V. 28. № 1. P. 70–82. (In Russian).
    17. 

  17. Kornienko D.S. Geneticheskie i sredovye faktory v svojstvah formal’no-dinamicheskogo urovnja integral’noj individual’nosti [Genetic and environmental factors in the characteristics of formal-dynamic level of integral individuality]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2010. V. 31. № 2. P. 79–86. (In Russian).
    18. 

  18. Kravchenko S.A. Novye riski edy: neobhodimost’ gumanisticheskoj biopolitiki. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2014. V. 35. № 5. P. 139–152. (In Russian).
    19. 

  19. Levkovich V.P. Dobrachnaja beremennost’ kak odin iz faktorov destabilizacii sem’i [Premarital pregnancy as a factor of family destabilization]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2011. V. 32. № 2. P. 109–115. (In Russian).
    20. 

  20. Lyakso E.E., Gromova A.D., Kurazhova A.V. i dr. Vlijanie materinskoj deprivacii i nevrologicheskih zabolevanij na rechevoe razvitie detej pervyh treh let zhizni [Mothernal deprivation and neurologic disease influence on speech development of children of the first three years of life]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2006. V. 27. № 2. P. 102–112. (In Russian).
    21. 

  21. Nikiforov G.S., Shingaev S.M. Psi hologija professional’nogo zdorov’ja kak aktual’noe nauchnoe napravlenie [Occupational health psychology as an actual scientific direction]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2015. V. 36. № 2. P. 44–54. (In Russian).
    22. 

  22. Oleskin A.V. Biopolitika. Moscow: Nauchnyj mir, 2007. (In Russian).
    23. 

  23. Oleskin A.V. Biopolitika. Politicheskij potencial sovremennoj biologii. Filosofskie, politologicheskie i prakticheskie aspekty. Moscow: Institut filosofii RAN, 2001. (In Russian).
    24. 

  24. Oleskin A.V. Politicheskij potencial sovremennoj biologii. Vestnik Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk, 1999. № 1. P. 35– 41. (In Russian).
    25. 

  25. Pamjati professora M.V. Guseva. M.V. Gusev i seminar “Biopolitika”. URL: http://www.sevin.ru/fundecology/ biopolitics/bp05-2.html (data obrashhenija: 20.06.2015). (In Russian).
    26. 

  26. Petrovskij A.V. Zapret na kompleksnoe issledovanie detstva. Repressirovannaja nauka. L.: Nauka, 1991. P. 126– 135. (In Russian).
    27. 

  27. Polskaya N.A. Prediktory i mehanizmy samopovrezhdajushhego povedenija (po  materialam issledovanij). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. V. 30. № 1. P. 96–105. (In Russian).
    28. 

  28. Polskaya N.A. Struktura i funkcii samopovrezhdajushhego povedenija [Structure and functions of self-injurious behavior]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2014. V. 35. № 2. P. 45–56. (In Russian).
    29. 

  29. Prikhidko A.I., Gulevich O.A. Mezhgruppovye jemocii v uslovijah politicheskoj konkurencii [Intergroup emotions in the context of political competition]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektron. nauch. zhurn. 2010. № 1(9). URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashhenija: 20.06.2015). (In Russian).
    30. 

  30. Psihologi schitajut, chto jekspertiza po delu Pussy Riot diskreditiruet ih professiju. Otkrytoe pis’mo. Novaja gazeta. 13 avgusta 2012. URL: https://www. novayagazeta.ru/news/2012/08/13/58514-psihologischitayutchto-ekspertiza-po-delu-pussy-riot-diskreditiruet-ih-professiyu-otkrytoe-pismo-podpisi (data obrashhenija 27.12.2016). (In Russian).
    31. 

  31. Radina N.K., Ryhtik M.I. Pacient otdelenija transplantologii: potrebnosti, problemy, perspektivy (na  primere pacientov FRG “POMC FMBA Rossii”). Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2010. № 1 (2). P. 128. (In Russian).
    32. 

  32. Ryhtik M.I., Kvashnin D.A. Sovremennaja biopolitika i voprosy upravlenija novymi riskami. Vlast’. 2009. № 8. P. 28–31. (In Russian).
    33. 

  33. Smolova L.V. Psihologija vzaimodejstvija s okruzhajushhej sredoj (jekologicheskaja psihologija). St. Petersburg: SPbGIPSR, 2010. (In Russian).
    34. 

  34. Sosnin V.A. Psihologija suicidal’nogo terrorizma v XXI veke: istoricheskie paralleli i  sovremennye geopoliticheskie tendencii [Psychology of suicidal terrorism in XXI century: historical parallels and modern geopolitical tendencies]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2011. V. 32. № 4. P. 32–46. (In Russian).
    35. 

  35. Suhanov A.A. Vlijanija jekologicheski neblagoprijatnoj sredy na intellektual’noe razvitie detej. Dissertacija na soiskanie uch.st.k.psihol.n. Moscow: PI RAO RF, 2005. (In Russian).
    36. 

  36. Tishhenko P. Bio-vlast’ v jepohu tehnologij. Moscow: IF RAN, 2001. (In Russian).
    37. 

  37. Federal’nyj reestr odarennyh detej. Jekspertnoe soobshhestvo professional’nyh psihologov. 20 avgusta 2015 g. URL: http://forum.ht-line.ru/threads/federalnyj-reestrodarennyx-detej.1356/ (data obrashhenija 27.12.2016). (In Russian).
    38. 

  38. Filippova G.G. Psihologija materinstva. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Psihoterapii, 2002. (In Russian).
    39. 

  39. Fomin-Shahov O. Biopoliticheskij kontrol’ jelit. Razvitie i jekonomika. 2013. № 8. P. 118–129. (In Russian).
    40. 

  40. Fond “Talant i uspeh”: okolo 7 tys. imen vkljucheno v Federal’nyj reestr odarennyh detej. TASS: 1 sentjabrja 2016. URL: http://tass.ru/obschestvo/3583373 (data obrashhenija 27.12.2016). (In Russian).
    41. 

  41. Frolova S.V. Smysloobrazujushhie faktory jemigracionnyh namerenij [The sense-formation factors of students emigratory intentions]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2006. № 3. P. 58–67. (In Russian).
    42. 

  42. Fuko M. Bezopasnost’, territorija, naselenie. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1977–1978 uchebnom godu. M. Fuko; per. s fr. V. Ju. Bystrova, N.V. Suslova, A.V. Shestakova. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2011. (In Russian).
    43. 

  43. Fuko M. Istorija seksual’nosti – III: Zabota o sebe. M.: REFL-BUK; Kiev: Duh i literatura, 1998. (In Russian).
    44. 

  44. Fuko M. Nuzhno zashhishhat’ obshhestvo: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1975–1976 uch.g. Per. s fr. E.A. Samarskoj. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2005. (In Russian).
    45. 

  45. Fuko M. Psihiatricheskaja vlast’: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1973–1974 godu. Per. s fr. A.V. Shestakova. St. Petersburg, 2007. (In Russian).
    46. 

  46. Fuko M. Rozhdenie biopolitiki: Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1978–1979 uchebnom godu. Per. s fr. A. V. D’jakov. St. Petersburg, 2010. (In Russian).
    47. 

  47. Fuko M. Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’: rozhdenie tjur’my. Disciplina. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1999. (In Russian).
    48. 

  48. Cherednikova T.V. Sovremennye nejropsihologicheskie, nejrogeneticheskie i nejromatematicheskie koncepcii narushenij myshlenija pri shizofrenii: obzor [Modern neuropsychological, neurogenetic and neuromathematical concepts of schizophrenic thought disorders (review)]. Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. № 1(15). URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashhenija: 20.06.2015). (In Russian).
    49. 

  49. Cheshko V.F., Glazko V.I. High Hume (biovlast’ i biopolitika v obshhestve riska). Moscow: RGAU-MSHA, 2009. (In Russian).
    50. 

  50. Shafigullin V.A. Iz istorii razvitija biopoliticheskih znanij. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskoj gosudarstvennoj Akademii veterinanrnoj mediciny im. N. Je. Baumana. Materialy vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Aktual’nye problemy nauchnogo i kadrovogo obespechenija innovacionnogo razvitija APK”, 29.31 maja 2012 g., Kazan’ 2012. V. 212. P. 499–502. (In Russian).
    51. 

  51. Jetkind A.M. Rascvet i krah pedologicheskogo dvizhenija (ot  psihoanaliza k “novomu massovomu cheloveku”). Filosofskie issledovanija. 1993. № 4. P. 224–251. (In Russian).
    52. 

  52. Yaroshevskij M.G. Marksizm v sovetskoj psihologii (k social’noj roli rossijskoj nauki). Repressirovannaja nauka. Vypusk 2. St. Peretsburg: Nauka, 1994. P. 24– 44. (In Russian).
    53. 

  53. Yasvin V.A. Psihologija otnoshenija k prirode. Moscow: Smysl, 2000. (In Russian).
    54. 

  54. Aradau Cl. Rethinking Trafficking in Women. Politics out of Security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2008.
    55. 

  55. Baschetti R. Evolutionary, neurobiological, gene-based solution of the ideological “puzzle” of human altruism and cooperation // Med. Hypotheses. 2007. № 69. P. 241–249.
    56. 

  56. Beckwith J., Corey A.M. Twin Studies of Political Behavior: Untenable Assumptions? // Perspectives on Politics. 2008. № 6 (4). P. 785–791.
    57. 

  57. Bouchard T. J., Segal N. L., Tellegen A., McGue M., Keyes M., Krueger. R. Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson conservatism scale: a reared-apart twins study of social attitudes // Personality and Individual Differences. 2003. № 34 (6). P. 959–969.
    58. 

  58. Caldwell L.K. Biopolitics // Yale Review. 1964. № 54. P. 1–16.
    59. 

  59. Caspi A., McClay J., Moffitt T. E., Mill J., Martin J., Craig I. W., Taylor A., Poulton R. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children // Science. 2002. № 297 (5582). P. 851–854.
    60. 

  60. Cooper M. Pre-Empting Emergence: The Biological Turn in the War on Terror // Theory, Culture and Society. 2006. V. 23. № 4. P. 113–135.
    61. 

  61. Dillon M., Reid J. Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War // Millennium – Journal of International Studies. 2001. V. 30. № 1. P. 41–66.
    62. 

  62. Elbe S. AIDS, Security, Biopolitics // International Relations. 2005. V. 19. № 4. P. 403–419.
    63. 

  63. Fraser N. From Discipline to Flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the Shadow of Globalization // Constellations. 2003. V. 10. № 2. P. 160–171.
    64. 

  64. Hardt M., Negri A. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.
    65. 

  65. Hatemi P. K., Hibbing J. R., Medland S. E., Keller M. C., Alford J. R., Smith K. B., Martin N. G., Eaves L.J. Not by Twins Alone: Using the Extended Family Design to Investigate Genetic Influence on Political Beliefs // American Journal of Political Science. 2010. V. 54. № 3. P. 798–814.
    66. 

  66. Hindess B. Citizenship in the international management of populations // American Behavioral Scientist. 2000. V. 43. № 9. P. 1486–1497.
    67. 

  67. Joseph J. The Genetics of Political Attitudes and Behavior: Claims and Refutations // Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry. 2010. V. 12. № 3. P. 200–217.
    68. 

  68. Kelly M. Racism, Nationalism and Biopolitics: Foucault’s Society Must Be Defended // Contretemps, 2004. № 4. P. 58–70.
    69. 

  69. Kiersey N.J. Scale, Security, and Political Economy: Debating the Biopolitics of the Global War on Terror // New Political Science. 2009. V. 31. № 1. P. 27–47.
    70. 

  70. Laurette T. L., Walsh M.B. The competing meanings of “biopolitics” in political science // Politics and the Life Sciences 2012. V. 31. № 1–2. P. 1–17.
    71. 

  71. Masters R. D., Sullivan D. Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political information processing / In S. Iyengar & W. McGuire (Eds.) Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993.
    72. 

  72. Morley R. Bio-politics: An Essay in the Physiology, Pathology and Politics of the Social and Somatic Organism. London: Dent, 1938.
    73. 

  73. Nadesan M.H. Governmentality, Biopower, and Everyday Life. New York: Routledge, 2008.
    74. 

  74. Neal A.W. Foucault in Guantanamo: Towards an Archaeology of the Exception // Security Dialogue. 2006. V. 37. № 1. P. 31–46.
    75. 

  75. Nigel M. de S. Cameron. Biotechnology and the Future of Humanity // Journal of Contemporary Healf Law & Policy. 2006. V. 22. № 2. P. 413–423.
    76. 

  76. Salter M.B. When the Exception Becomes the Rule: Borders, Sovereignty, and Citizenship // Citizenship Studies. 2008. V. 12. № 4. P. 365–380.
    77. 

  77. Shiva V. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Toronto: Between the Lines, 1997.
    78. 

  78. Sullivan D.G., Masters R.D. “Happy Warriors”: Leaders’ Facial Displays, Viewers’ Emotions, and Political Support // American Journal of Political Science. 1988. V. 32. P. 345–368.
    79. 

  79. Varone F., Schiffino N. Regulating Red and Green Biotechnologies in Belgium: Diverging Designs of Biopolicies // Arch Public Health. 2004. V. 62. P. 83–106.
    80.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate