Везде
PHENOMENON OF SECULAR IQ GAINS: THE ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN''S FICTION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PHENOMENON OF SECULAR IQ GAINS: THE ANALYSIS OF CHILDREN''S FICTION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000357-9-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000357-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
DANILEVSKAYA N.M.  EKATERINA LAPTEVA Dmitriy Ushakov
Abstract
The causes for the Flynn effect are analyzed in the context of the structural-dynamic theory of intelligence. The Flynn effect describes the phenomenon of the rise of cognitive abilities during the 20th century. To some extent this effect may be explained by the transition of the people's cognitive potential from the emotionally-figurative domain into the rational one. In order to test this assumption we conducted the empirical study of the literature for children written in between the 1900th and the 2016th. We developed methods to evaluate text cognitive complexity. Despite the growth of the intelligence test performance, the complexity of the children's fiction decreased over the 20th century.
Keywords
intelligence, Flynn effect, structural-dynamic theory, children’s fiction, text analysis.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
588
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Valueva E.A., Danilevskaja N.M., Lapteva E.M., Ushakov D.V. Kognitivnaja slozhnost’ hudozhestvennyh tekstov dlja detej: kvantitativnye metody ocenki // Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 2017. № 1 (31). P. 42–61. (In Russian).
    2. 

  2. Valueva E.A., Belova C.C. Jeffekt Flinna: obzor sovremennyh dannyh // Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2015. V. 12. № 4. P. 165–183. (In Russian).
    3. 

  3. Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Kul’turnaja relevantnost’ i svojstva testov intellekta: proverka predskazanij strukturno-dinamicheskoj teorii // Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2013. V. 10. № 3. P. 29–40. (In Russian).
    4. 

  4. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V., Jurevich A.V. Perspektivy psihologii v reshenii zadach rossijskogo obshhestva. Chast’ 1. Postanovka problemy i  teoretikometodologicheskie zadachi // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013. V. 34. № 1. P. 3–14. (In Russian).
    5. 

  5. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V., Jurevich A.V. Perspektivy psihologii v reshenii zadach rossijskogo obshhestva. Chast’ 2. Konceptual’nye osnovanija // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013. V. 34. № 2. P. 70–86. (In Russian).
    6. 

  6. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V., Jurevich A.V. Perspektivy psihologii v reshenii zadach rossijskogo obshhestva. Chast’ 3. Na puti k tehnologijam soglasovanija social’nyh institutov i mentaliteta // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2013. V. 34. № 6. P. 5–25. (In Russian).
    7. 

  7. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V., Jurevich A.V. Mentalitet, obshhestvo i psihosocial’nyj chelovek – otvet v diskussii // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 1. P. 107–112. (In Russian).
    8. 

  8. Inglehart R., Welzel K. Modernizacija, kul’turnye izmenenija i demokratija: Posledovatel’nost’ chelovecheskogo razvitija. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2011. (In Russian).
    9. 

  9. Ushakov D.V. Psihologija intellekta i  odarennosti. M.: Izdatel’stvo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2011. (In Russian).
    10. 

  10. Ushakov D.V. Odarennost’, tvorchestvo, intuicija // Osnovnye sovremennye koncepcii tvorchestva i odarennosti / Ed. D.B. Bogojavlenskoj. Moscow: Molodaja gvardija, 1997. P. 78–89. (In Russian).
    11. 

  11. Ushakov D.V. Social’nyj intellekt kak vid intellekta // Social’nyj intellekt: teorija, izmerenie, issledovanija / Ed. D.V. Ljusina, D.V. Ushakova. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2004. P. 11–28. (In Russian).
    12. 

  12. Ushakova T.H. Tekst kak ob’ekt psihologicheskogo analiza // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1989. V. 10. № 1. P. 107–116. (In Russian).
    13. 

  13. Ushakova T.H. Prirodnye osnovanija rechejazykovoj sposobnosti rebenka (analiz rannego rechevogo razvitija) // Jazykovoe soznanie: formirovanie i  funkcionirovanie. Moscow: Institut jazykoznanija RAN, 1998. P. 7–23. (In Russian).
    14. 

  14. Ushakova T.H., Belova C.C., Valueva E.A. Lingvopsihologicheskoe issledovanie verbal’noj semantiki // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2010. V. 31. № 6. P. 83–97. (In Russian).
    15. 

  15. Breland H.M. Birth order, family configuration, and verbal achievement. // Child development. 1974. Vol. 45. № 4. P. 1011–1019.
    16. 

  16. Carpenter P.A., Just M.A., Shell P. What one intelligence test measures: a theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test // Psychological review. 1990. Vol. 97. № 3. P. 404–431.
    17. 

  17. Dutton E., Lynn R. A negative flynn effect in Finland, 1997–2009 // Intelligence. 2013. Vol. 41. № 6. P. 817–820.
    18. 

  18. Dutton E., Lynn R. A negative Flynn Effect in France, 1999 to 2008–9 // Intelligence. 2015. Vol. 51. P. 67–70.
    19. 

  19. Fletcher J.M., Stuebing K.K., Hughes L.C. IQ scores should be corrected for the Flynn Effect in high-stakes decisions // Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2010. Vol. 28. P. 469–473.
    20. 

  20. Flynn J.R. The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. // Psychological Bulletin. 1984. Vol. 95. № 1. P. 29–51.
    21. 

  21. Flynn J.R. Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure // Psychological Bulletin. 1987. Vol. 101. № 2. P. 171–191.
    22. 

  22. te Nijenhuis J., van der Flier H. Is the Flynn effect on g?: A meta-analysis // Intelligence. 2013. Vol. 41. № 6. P. 802–807.
    23. 

  23. Pietschnig J., Voracek M. One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909–2013) // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2015. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 282–306.
    24. 

  24. Sundet J.M., Barlaug D.G., Torjussen T.M. The end of the Flynn effect? A study of secular trends in mean intelligence test scores of Norwegian conscripts during half a century // Intelligence. 2004. Vol. 32. P. 349–362.
    25. 

  25. Teasdale T.W., Owen D.R. Secular declines in cognitive test scores: A reversal of the Flynn Effect // Intelligence. 2008. Vol. 36. P. 121–126.
    26. 

  26. Trahan L., Stuebing K. The Flynn effect: A meta-analysis // Psychological Bulletin. 2014. Vol. 140, № 5. P. 1332–1360.
    27. 

  27. Woodley M.A., Te Nijenhuis J., Must O., Must A. Controlling for increased guessing enhances the independence of the Flynn effect from g: The return of the Brand effect // Intelligence. 2014. Vol. 43. № 1. P. 27–34.
    28.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate