INTERRELATION BETWEEN STRUCTURES OF MEANING, REFLEXITY AND RESILIENCE
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
INTERRELATION BETWEEN STRUCTURES OF MEANING, REFLEXITY AND RESILIENCE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000358-0-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
The article is devoted to the definition of the role of reflexivity and structures of meaning for resilience. The results of adult sample study (n = 122; age 18-65 years, 60 males, 62 females) are presented. It has been shown that the resilience in various ways is connected with the structures of meaning and the level of reflexivity as in the whole sample, and in different gender groups. The main components of resilience of the sample are the individual resources, including positive self-esteem, internality and the general attitude towards the world of meaning. The gender differences are shown: males' resilience connected with the knowledge of the world as benevolent and kindly people, females' resilience associated with justice and well-controlled world. It was proved that male' reflexivity is an adaptive regulatory mechanisms associated with their general resilience and individual resources of resilience, internality, their awareness of the world as a meaningful and supportive, with the kindness of people, as well as the perception of themselves as fortunate and lucky. The level of reflexivity in the group of men is their adaptive regulative mechanism and has correlation with their resilience.
Keywords
resilience, reflexivity, structures of meaning, resources.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
548
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000358-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 05.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Abul'khanova-Slavskaya K.A. Strategiya zhizni. M.: Mysl', 1990.
  2. Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. L.: Izd-vo Leningr. gos. un-ta, 1968.
  3. Anan'ev B.G. O  problemakh sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya. M.: Nauka, 1977.
  4. Bazhin E.F., Golynkina E.A., Ehtkind A.M. Metod issledovaniya urovnya sub'ektivnogo kontrolya // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 1984. T. 
  5. № 3. S. 152–162. 5. Bendas T.V. Gendernaya psikhologiya: Uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Piter, 2006.
  6. Bogomaz S.A., Gladkikh A.G. Psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' i ee izmerenie s pomosch'yu Shkaly bazisnykh ubezhdenij // Vestnik Tomskogo gosuniversiteta. 2009. № 318. S. 191–194.
  7. Vyatkin B.A. Lektsii po psikhologii integral'noj individual'nosti cheloveka. Perm': PGPU, 2000.
  8. Dikaya L.G. Psikhicheskaya samoregulyatsiya funktsional'nogo sostoyaniya cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2003.
  9. Zejgarnik B.V. Patopsikhologiya. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1986.
  10. Il'in E.P. Pol i gender. SPb.: Piter, 2010.
  11. Karpov A.V. Metasistemnaya organizatsiya urovnevykh struktur psikhiki. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2004.
  12. Karpov A.V. Psikhologiya refleksivnykh mekhanizmov deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2004.
  13. Karpov A.V. Refleksivnost' kak psikhicheskoe svojstvo i metodika ee diagnostiki // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. № 5. S. 45–57.
  14. Kostin A.N., Golikov Yu.Ya. Organizatsionno-protsessual'nyj analiz psikhicheskoj regulyatsii slozhnoj deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014.
  15. Laktionova A.I. Formirovanie zhiznesposobnosti podrostkov // Psikhologiya cheloveka i  obschestva: nauchno-prakticheskie issledovaniya / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko, N.V. Tarabrina. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014. S. 224–247.
  16. Laktionova A.I. Zhiznesposobnost' kak resurs sotsial'noj adaptatsii u podrostkov // Psikhologicheskie problemy sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013. S. 232–253.
  17. Laktionova A.I. Strukturno-urovnevaya organizatsiya zhiznesposobnosti cheloveka: metasistemnyj podkhod // Lichnost' professionala v  sovremennom mire / Otv. red. L.G. Dikaya, A.L. Zhuravlev. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”. 2013. S. 109–126.
  18. Laktionova A.I., Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' i  sotsial'naya adaptatsiya podrostkov-sirot // Problema sirotstva v sovremennoj Rossii: Psikhologicheskij aspekt / Otv. red. A.V. Makhnach, A.M. Prikhozhan, N.N. Tolstykh. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2015. S. 193–223.
  19. Leont'ev D.A., Averina A.Zh. Fenomen refleksii v kontekste problemy samoregulyatsii // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: ehlektron. nauch. zhurn. 2011. № 2 (16). URL: http://psystudy.ru. (Data obrascheniya: 04.01.2016).
  20. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i  teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii. M.: Nauka, 1984.
  21. Malkina-Pykh I.G. Gendernaya terapiya (Spravochnik prakticheskogo psikhologa). M.: Ehksmo, 2006.
  22. Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: izmerenie i  operatsionalizatsiya termina // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya problem sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013. S. 54–83.
  23. Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka i sem'i: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya paradigma. M.: Izdvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
  24. Makhnach A.V., Postylyakova Yu.V. Model' zhiznesposobnosti sem'i // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya problem sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. M.: Izdvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013. S. 438–460.
  25. Merlin V.S. Ocherk individual'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. M.: Pedagogika, 1986.
  26. Muzdybaev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti. M.: Librokom, 2010.
  27. Nesterova A.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskij podkhod k  ponimaniyu konstrukta “zhiznesposobnost' lichnosti” // Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: individual'nye, professional'nye i  sotsial'nye aspekty / Otv. red. A.V. Makhnach, L.G. Dikaya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
  28. Padun M.A., Kotel'nikova A.V. Psikhicheskaya travma i kartina mira. Teoriya, ehmpiriya, praktika. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012.
  29. Sergienko E.A. Razvitie psikhologii sub'ekta i sub'ekt razvitiya // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. T. 33. № 1. S. 7–19.
  30. Tarabrina N.V., Kharlamenkova N.E. Sovladayuschee povedenie i posttravmaticheskij stress v period srednej i pozdnej vzroslosti // Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: individual'nye, professional'nye i sotsial'nye aspekty / Otv. red. A.V. Makhnach, L.G. Dikaya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
  31. Uajbrou P. Mozg: Tonkaya nastrojka. Nasha zhizn' s tochki zreniya nejronauki. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2016.
  32. Kharlamenkova N.E., Kumykova E.V., Rubchenko A.K. Psikhologicheskaya separatsiya: podkhody, problemy, mekhanizmy. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2015.
  33. Shapiro D. Dinamika kharaktera: Samoregulyatsiya pri psikhopatologii. M.: Klass, 2009.
  34. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
  35. Masten A.S., Best K.M., Garmezy N. Resilience and development: contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity // Development and Psychopathology. 1990. V. 2. P. 425–444.
  36. Rotter J.B. The development and applications of social learning theory. N. Y.: Praeger, 1982.
  37. Sroufe L.A., Egeland B., Carlson E., Collins W.A. The development of the person: The Minnesota study of risk and adaptation from birth to adulthood. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.
  38. Théorêt M. La résilience, de l’observation du phénomène vers l’appropriation du concept par l’éducation // Revue des Sciences de L’éducation. 2005. V. 31. № 3. P. 633–658.
  39. Ungar M., Liebenberg L. The Resilience Research Centre Adult Resilience Measure (RRC-ARM). User’s manual: Research. Halifax: RRC, 2013.
  40. Werner E.E. Risk, resilience, and recovery: perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study // Development and psychopathology. 1993. V. 5. P. 503–515.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate