Везде
LINGVO-SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUTH''S COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL NETS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
LINGVO-SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF YOUTH''S COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR IN SOCIAL NETS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000366-9-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000366-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
IRINA ZAPESOTSKAYA  E. Petrash V. Nikishina
Abstract
Lingvosemantic peculiarities of communicative behavior of youth in social nets have been studied, with the range and quality of speech units, communicative patterns and topics of messages among them. 85 young people aged 18-21 and 1319 men entering into communication with them constitute the sample (45 young men and 41 young girls). 15 322 messages including 114 dialogs have been analyzed by means of discourse analysis and method of functional pragmatics. It has been revealed the youth's communicative behavior in social nets is characterized by low semantic organization, ambivalent modality with predominance of unconstructive communicative patterns and egocentric orientation of content in messages. Communicative behavior in social nets is realized with the accent on the form but not the content: ignoring of punctuation and orthography in construction of communicative messages and their meanings is prevailing. Personal information, information about third persons as well as abstract information is presented in messages while social significant problems are rare.
Keywords
communicative behavior, lingvosemantic peculiarities, speech units, communicative patterns, types of communicative system, modality of communication, topic of a message.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
578
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Antonov V.P. Osobennosti proyavleniya verbal'noj agressii v rechevom (kommunikativnom) povedenii sovremennoj sotsial'no izvestnoj yazykovoj lichnosti // Vestnik Khakasskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.F. Katanova. 2013. № 3. S. 34–40.
    2. 

  2. Belinskaya E.P. Informatsionnaya sotsializatsiya podrostkov: opyt pol'zovaniya sotsial'nymi setyami i psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie // Psikhol. issledovaniya. 2013. T. 6. № 30. URL: http://psystady.ru. (Data obrascheniya: 18.05.2014)
    3. 

  3. Bulygina T.V., Shmelev A.D. Yazykovaya kontseptualizatsiya mira (na materiale russkoj grammatiki). M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 1997.
    4. 

  4. Vojskunskij A.E. Perspektivy stanovleniya psikhologii Interneta // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2013. T. 34. № 3. S. 110–118.
    5. 

  5. Zajnullin M.V. Modal'nost' kak funktsional'no-semanticheskaya kategoriya: Na materiale bashk. yaz. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 1986.
    6. 

  6. Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. M.: Politizdat, 1977.
    7. 

  7. Mityagina V.A. Unifikatsiya v kommunikativnom povedenii: fenomen vezhlivosti // Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2005. № 3. S. 39–45.
    8. 

  8. Rippinen T.O., Slobodskaya E.R. Vzaimosvyazi lichnostnykh osobennostej podrostkov s povsednevnym ispol'zovaniem komp'yutera // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 4. S. 30–37.
    9. 

  9. Smolina E.G. Ponyatie “seti” kak novyj vzglyad na ustrojstvo obschestva // Nauchnyj vestnik Volgogradskogo filiala RANKhiGS. Seriya: Politologiya i sotsiologiya. 2015. № 2. S. 23–28.
    10. 

  10. Sternin H.A. O natsional'nom kommunikativnom soznanii // Lingvisticheskij vestnik. Izhevsk, 2002. Vyp. 4. S. 87–94.
    11. 

  11. Sushkov I.R., Kozlova N.S. Internet-aktivnost' kak proyavlenie potrebnosti lichnosti v kollektivnom sub'ekte // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 5. S. 75–83.
    12. 

  12. Filips L. Dzh., Jorgensen M.V. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod. Khar'kov: Izd-vo Gumanitarnyj Tsentr, 2004.
    13. 

  13. Fond obschestvennogo mneniya. URL: http://runet. fom.ru. (Data obrascheniya: 10.03.2015).
    14. 

  14. Khazova S.A. Kommunikativnye sposobnosti i sotsial'nyj intellekt v sotsial'nom povedenii v rannej yunosti // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsial'naya rabota. Yuvenologiya. Sotsiokinetika. 2012. T. 18. № 1. S. 192–197.
    15. 

  15. Shevchenko O.P. Gendernye otlichiya v kommunikativnom povedenii politikov // Lingua mobilis. 2009. T. 19. № 5. S. 130–134.
    16. 

  16. Shejlz Dzh. Kommunikativnost' v obuchenii sovremennomu yazyku: Proekt № 12: “Izuchenie i prepodavanie sovremennogo yazyka dlya tselej obscheniya”. M.: Prosveschenie, 1991.
    17. 

  17. Shpomer E.A. Printsip kritiki v kommunikativnom povedenii: k probleme sootnosheniya kommunikativnykh zakonov i tipologii yazykovykh lichnostej kommunikantov // Nauchno-informatsionnyj zhurnal “Armiya i obschestvo”. 2011. № 1(25). S. 45–49.
    18. 

  18. Adobe Social URL: http://www.adobe.com/ru/. (Data obrascheniya: 10.03.2015)
    19. 

  19. Brandtzceg P.B., Hein J., Karahasanovic A. Understanding the new digital divide – a typology of Internet users in Europe // International Journ. of Human-Computer Studies. 2011. V. 69. № 3. P. 123–138.
    20. 

  20. Kalmus V., Realo A., Siibak A. Motives for internet use and their relationships with personality traits and socio-demographic factors // Trames, 2011. V. 15. № 4. P. 385–403.
    21. 

  21. Kraut R., Kiesler S., Boneva B. Internet paradox revisited // Journ. Soc Issues. 2002. V. 58. P. 49–74.
    22. 

  22. Peter J., Valkenburg P.M. Adolescents Internet use: Testing the “disappearing digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach // Poetics. 2006. V. 34. P. 293–305.
    23. 

  23. Sherry A., Henson R.K. Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: A user-friendly primer // Journ. of Personality Assessment. 2005. V. 84. № 1. P. 37–48.
    24. 

  24. Subrahmanyam K., Kraut R., Greenfield P., Gross E. The impact of home computer use on children’s activities and development // The Future of Children. 2000. V. 10. № 2. P. 123–144.
    25. 

  25. Swickert R.J., Hittner J.B., Harris J.L., Herring J.A. Relationships among Internet use, personality and social support // Computers in Human Behavior. 2002. V. 18. № 4. P. 437–451.
    26. 

  26. Van der Aa N., Overbeek G., Engels R., Schotle R., Meerkerk G., Eijnden van den R. Daily and compulsive Internet use and well-being in adolescence: A diathesisstress model based on Big Five personality traits // Jorn. Youth Adolescence. 2009. V. 38. P. 765–776.
    27.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate