Везде
HUMAN RESILIENCE AS RESEARCH OBJECT IN PSYCHOLOGY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
HUMAN RESILIENCE AS RESEARCH OBJECT IN PSYCHOLOGY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000375-9-
DOI
10.31857/S20000375-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Makhnach 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2231-1788
Abstract
The methodological and theoretical bases of concept "resilience" and highlightening of the fifth wave of this phenomenon study as a new stage of research are presented. It is shown that in modern research, the operationalization of the concept is accompanied by a significant expansion of interest in studying social and natural contexts of resilience. Emphasis to the importance of determining the place of the resilience concept among ontologically relative terms is drawn. The original author's component approach to resilience, which is mainly described in six interrelated components (five internal and one external): self-efficacy, persistence, coping and adaptation, internal locus of control, spirituality, family/social relationships is presented. The article describes the studies of some aspects of resilience by scientists of IP RAS. In the conclusion, there is the need to identify areas for further research of resilience of a person, family, community and society, as well the development of methodological basis and methodical tools for measuring this characteristic.
Keywords
resilience, individual resilience, family resilience, society resilience, component model of resilience, the ecological approach to the study of resilience.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
694
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000375-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 06.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. SPb.: Piter, 2001.
    2. 

  2. Bogdanov A.A. Bor'ba za zhiznesposobnost'. M.: Novaya Moskva, 1927.
    3. 

  3. Vekker L.M. Psikhika i real'nost'. Edinaya teoriya psikhicheskikh protsessov. M.: Smysl, Per Se, 2000.
    4. 

  4. Vygotskij L.S. Analiz znakovykh operatsij rebenka // Vygotskij L.S. Sobranie sochinenij: v 6-ti t. T. 6. M.: Pedagogika, 1984. S. 60–75.
    5. 

  5. Dikaya L.G. Lichnostnyj potentsial i ehmotsional'noe vygoranie pedagoga // Chelovek. Soobschestvo. Upravlenie. 2012. № 3. S. 75–88.
    6. 

  6. Dikaya L.G. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya truda na novom ehtape razvitiya: metodologo-teoreticheskie osnovaniya i ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. T. 33. № 2. S. 5–22.
    7. 

  7. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: individual'nye, professional'nye i sotsial'nye aspekty. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
    8. 

  8. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V., Yurevich A.V. Perspektivy psikhologii v reshenii zadach rossijskogo obschestva. Chast' I. Postanovka problemy i teoretiko-metodologicheskie zadachi // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2013. T. 34. № 1. S. 3–14.
    9. 

  9. Zhuravlev A.L., Yurevich A.V. Kollektivnye smysly kak predposylka lichnogo schast'ya // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 1. S. 5–15.
    10. 

  10. Laktionova A.I. Strukturno-urovnevaya organizatsiya zhiznesposobnosti kak metasposobnosti // Lichnost' professionala v sovremennom mire. M.: Izdvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013. S. 109–126.
    11. 

  11. Laktionova A.I. Formirovanie zhiznesposobnosti podrostkov // Psikhologiya cheloveka i obschestva: nauchno-prakticheskie issledovaniya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014. S. 224–247.
    12. 

  12. Laktionova A.I. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: metakognitivnyj podkhod // Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: individual'nye, professional'nye i sotsial'nye aspekty. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016. S. 88–110.
    13. 

  13. Laktionova A.I., Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' kak faktor adekvatnogo professional'nogo samoopredeleniya i sotsializatsii // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya truda: teoriya i praktika. T. 1. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2010. S. 459–477.
    14. 

  14. Laktionova A.I., Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' i sotsial'naya adaptatsiya podrostkov-sirot // Problema sirotstva v sovremennoj Rossii: Psikhologicheskij aspekt. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2015. S. 193–223.
    15. 

  15. Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka: izmerenie i operatsionalizatsiya termina // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya problem sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013. S. 54–83.
    16. 

  16. Makhnach A.V. Sotsial'naya model' kak paradigma v issledovanii zhiznesposobnosti cheloveka // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke. 2013. № 2 (38). S. 46–53.
    17. 

  17. Makhnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost' cheloveka i sem'i: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya paradigma. M.: Izdvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
    18. 

  18. Makhnach A.V., Laktionova A.I. Zhiznesposobnost' podrostka: ponyatie i kontseptsiya // Psikhologiya adaptatsii i sotsial'naya sreda: sovremennye podkhody, problemy, perspektivy. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2007. S. 290–312.
    19. 

  19. Makhnach A.V., Postylyakova Yu.V. Model' zhiznesposobnosti sem'i // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya problem sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013. S. 438–460.
    20. 

  20. Mid M. Kul'tura i mir detstva. M.: Nauka, 1988.
    21. 

  21. Nesterova A.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya kontseptsiya zhiznesposobnosti molodezhi v situatsii poteri raboty: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra psikhol. nauk. M., 2011.
    22. 

  22. Plotinskij Yu.M. Modeli sotsial'nykh protsessov: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. M.: Logos, 2001.
    23. 

  23. Postylyakova Yu.V. Individual'nye i semejnye resursy u kandidatov v zameschayuschie roditeli // Problema sirotstva v sovremennoj Rossii: Psikhologicheskij aspekt. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2015. S. 459–477.
    24. 

  24. Printsip razvitiya v sovremennoj psikhologii. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
    25. 

  25. Ryl'skaya E.A. Nauchnye podkhody k issledovaniyu zhiznesposobnosti cheloveka v zarubezhnoj psikhologii // Teoriya i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiya. 2014. № 8. S. 57–58.
    26. 

  26. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie issledovaniya goroda. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
    27. 

  27. Tarabrina N.V., Bykhovets Yu.V. Terroristicheskaya ugroza: teoretiko-ehmpiricheskoe issledovanie. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014.
    28. 

  28. Makhnach A., Laktionova A. Social and cultural roots of Russian youth resilience: Interventions by the state, society, and the family // Handbook for Working with Children and Youth. Pathways to Resilience across Cultures and Contexts / M. Ungar (Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2005. P. 371–386.
    29. 

  29. Masten A.S., Obradovic J. Competence and resilience in development // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006. V. 1094. P. 13–27.
    30. 

  30. O’Leary V. Strength in the face of adversity: individual and social thriving // Journal of Social Issues. 1998. V. 54 (2). P. 425–446.
    31. 

  31. Obschonka M., Stuetzer M., Audretsch D.B., Rentfrow P.J., Potter J., Gosling S.D. Macropsychological factors predict regional economic resilience during a major economic crisis // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2016. V. 7 (2). P. 95–104.
    32. 

  32. Polk L.V. Toward a middle-range theory of resilience // Advances in Nursing Science. 1997. V. 19. P. 1–13.
    33. 

  33. Seligman M.E.P. Learned optimism: How to change your mind and your life. New York: Pocket Books, 1990.
    34. 

  34. Ungar M., Clark S.E., Kwong W-m., Makhnach A., Cameron C.A. Studying resilience across cultures // Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work. 2005. V. 14. № 3/4. P. 1–19.
    35. 

  35. Ungar M., Liebenberg L., Boothroyd R., Kwong W.M., Lee T.Y., Leblank J., Duque L., Makhnach A. The study of youth resilience across cultures: Lessons from a pilot study of measurement development // Research in Human Development. 2008. V. 5 (3). P. 166–180.
    36. 

  36. Werner E.E. High risk children in young adulthood: A longitudinal study from birth to 32 years // American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1989. V. 59. P. 72–81.
    37. 

  37. Windle G., Markland D.A., Woods R.T. Examination of a theoretical model of psychological resilience in older age // Aging and Mental Health. 2008. V. 12 (3). P. 285– 292.
    38. 

  38. Zautra A.J., Hall J.S., Murray K.E. Resilience: A new definition of health for people and communities // Handbook of Adult Resilience / J.W. Reich, A.J. Zautra, J.S. Hall (Eds.). New York, London: Guilford Press, 2010. R. 3–29.
    39.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate