Везде
INTERRELATION OF IMAGERY PERSPECTIVE AND IMAGINED MOVEMENT SPECIFICS AND EXPERTISE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
INTERRELATION OF IMAGERY PERSPECTIVE AND IMAGINED MOVEMENT SPECIFICS AND EXPERTISE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000376-0-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000376-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
IGOR KAMINSKY  Olga V. Almazova A. Veraksa
Abstract
Mental training is an effective mean commonly used in sport to enhance motor coordination. However, while imagining movements, athletes have an option to adopt either 1-st person or 3-d person perspective, which are believed to differ in effectiveness. Such a difference should be based on corresponding properties of 1-st person and 3-d person imagery that, in our view, have to be expressed in imagery perspective use as a function of imagined movement specifics and expertise. To investigate features of imagery perspective, we have tested 54 cross-country skiers (40 male and 14 female) aged from 11 to 31 (M = 16.3) and ranked from third-class junior to merited master of sport. All the subjects had to imagine 11 ski technical elements indicating preferred imagery perspective for each of them. Pairwise comparison of the elements in terms of imagery perspective revealed lots of significant differences indicating the role of speed and strength qualities of a movement as well as convenience for visual control in determining imagery perspective used. 46 subjects were divided into 4 groups according to their level of expertise using cluster analysis based on skill level evaluation by experts and cycles quantity in 2 roller-ski skating trials designed consistently with dual-task methodology. The rest of 8 subjects were qualified as best skilled since they were national team members. Groups formed by means of cluster analysis according to an imagery perspective predominantly used showed nonuniform distribution over expertise with an initial increase in number of subjects used 3-d person perspective that could be linked to the skill gain, and subsequent prevalence of subjects used 1-st person perspective supposedly resulting from influence of other factors when the skill had been learned.
Keywords
mental training, imagery perspective, dual task method, level of sport expertise, imagined movement specifics.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
599
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Bernshteĭn N.A. Fiziologiya dvizheniĭ i aktiv‐ nost' / pod red. O.G. Gazenko. M.: Nauka, 1990.
    2. 

  2. Veraksa A.N., Gorovaya A.E., Grushko A.I., Bayano- va L.F., Galiullina M.Sh., Galyavieva D.G. Adaptatsiya oprosnika “The sport imagery questionnaire” (SIQ) na russkoyazychnoĭ vyborke // Psikhologicheskiĭ zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. No 1. S. 120–129.
    3. 

  3. Veraksa A.N., Gorovaya A.E. Modeli ispol'zovaniya obrazov v sportivnoĭ psikhologii // Psikhologi‐ cheskaya nauka i obrazovanie psyedu.ru. 2011. No 1. URL: http://psyedu.ru/journal/2011/1/2069.phtml
    4. 

  4. Veraksa A.N., Leonov S.V., Gorovaya A.E. Psikhologi‐ cheskie osobennosti khudozhestvennykh gimnastok // Vestn. Mosk. un‐ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 2011. No 4. S. 134–147.
    5. 

  5. Kaminskiĭ I.V., Veraksa A.N. Rakurs psikhicheskogo obraza i ego rol' v myslennoĭ prorabotke dviga‐ tel'nykh navykov // Vestnik SPbGU. Ser. 16. Psi‐ khologiya. Pedagogika. 2016. No 2. S. 27–37.
    6. 

  6. Kaminskiĭ I.V. Kontrol' rakursa obrazov kak sredstvo povysheniya ehffektivnosti myslennoĭ prorabotki dvigatel'nykh navykov // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya. 2015. No 4. S. 83–97.
    7. 

  7. Kaminskiĭ I.V. Razlichnye aspekty psikhologiche‐ skoĭ podgotovki lyzhnikov‐gonschikov // Natsio‐ nal'nyĭ psikhologicheskiĭ zhurnal. 2013. No 2 (10). S. 117–126.
    8. 

  8. Novikova N.B. Primenenie videoanaliza v pro‐ tsesse nauchno‐metodicheskogo obespecheniya sbornoĭ komandy Rossii po lyzhnym gonkam // Itogovyĭ sbornik Vserossiĭskoĭ nauchno‐prakticheskoĭ konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Ito‐ gi vystupleniya sportivnykh sbornykh komand Ros‐ siĭskoĭ Federatsii na XXII Olimpiĭskikh zimnikh igrakh v g. Sochi”. 2014. S. 130–134.
    9. 

  9. Ramenskaya T.I. Tekhnicheskaya podgotovka lyzhnika: Uchebno‐prakticheskoe posobie. M.: FiS, 1999.
    10. 

  10. Abelson R.P. Does a story understander need a point of view? // Theoretical issues in natural language processing / R. Schank, B.I. Nash‐Webber (Eds.). Washington, DC: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1975. P. 140–143.
    11. 

  11. Abernethy B., Summers J.J., Ford S. Issues in the Measurement of Attention // Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology Measurement / J.L. Duda (Ed.). Morgantown WV: Fitness Information Technology, 1998. P. 173–194.
    12. 

  12. Collet C., Guillot A. The Development of Internal and External Imagery Perspectives: Interactions Among Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors // Journal of Mental Imagery. 2012. Vol. 36. No 1. P. 39–44.
    13. 

  13. A.R. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam, 1994.
    14. 

  14. Farb N.A S., Segal Z.V., Mayberg H., Bean J., McKeon D., Fatima Z., Anderson A.K. Attending to the present: Mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self‐reference // Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2007. N2. P. 313–322.
    15. 

  15. Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E., Etcoff N.L., Laufer J.K. Imaging, empathy, and causal attribution // J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1979. No 15. P. 356–377.
    16. 

  16. Forgati L.A., Morris T. Aspects of imagery in sports // Proceedings of the XI European Congress of Sport Psychology, 60. Copenhagen, Denmark. 2003.
    17. 

  17. Gallagher S. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000. N4. P. 14–21.
    18. 

  18. Glencross D.J. Control and capacity in the study of skill // Psychology and sport / D.J. Glencross (Ed.). Sydney: McGrow Hill, 1978. P. 72–96.
    19. 

  19. Hanin Y. Psychological Factors in Cross Country Skiing // Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science: Cross Country Skiing / H. Rusko (Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2008. P. 176–188.
    20. 

  20. Hardy L., Callow N. Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important // Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1999. N21. P. 95–112.
    21. 

  21. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall, 1973.
    22. 

  22. Libby L.K., Eibach R.P. Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representational tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and self‐insight // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology / M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson (Eds.). San Diego: Academic Press, 2011. Vol. 44. P. 185–245.
    23. 

  23. Mahoney M.J., Avener M. Psychology of the elite athlete: An exploratory study // Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1977. No 1. P. 135–141.
    24. 

  24. McIsaac H.K., Eich E. Vantage point in episodic memory // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2002. No 9. P. 144–150.
    25. 

  25. Morris T., Spittle M. A default hypothesis of the development of internal and external imagery perspectives // Journal of mental imagery. 2012. N36 (1–2). P. 1–30.
    26. 

  26. Nideffer R.M. Use of the Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style in Sport // The Sport Psychologist. 1990. No 4. P. 285–300.
    27. 

  27. Olsson C.-J., Jonsson B., Nyberg L. Internal imagery training in active high jumpers // Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2008. N49. P. 133–140.
    28. 

  28. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory // Psychol. Rev. 1977. No 84. P. 127–190.
    29. 

  29. Spittle M. Preference for imagery perspective, imagery perspective training and task performance: A thesis ... for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Melbourne, 2001.
    30. 

  30. Thanikkal S.J., Morris T., Ciorciari J. Using mirror neuron activity to study imagery in movement and sport // Meeting new challenges and bridging cultural gaps in sport and exercise psychology / A. Baria, E.H. Naoli, M. Madani, A. Essiyedali, M. Aragon, A.E. Ouartassi (Eds.) XII‐th ISSP World Congress of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Marrakech, Morocco, 2009.
    31. 

  31. Vallacher R.R., Wegner D.M. What do people think they are doing? Action identification and human behavior // Psychol. Rev. 1987. Vol. 94. No . 1. P. 3–15.
    32.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate