Везде
THE HABIT OF CRISIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE HABIT OF CRISIS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000378-2-
DOI
10.31857/S20000378-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
ALEXANDER FEDOROV 
Abstract
The article questioned the correctness of the statement that the world psychology is not in a crisis. There are supporters and opponents of the fact that psychology is in a crisis both among the Russian andforeign psychologists, so it cannot be said that the statement of crisis in psychological science is concealingthe crisis of identity of Russian psychologists. It is stated that the debate on the crisis in foreign psychologyis less sharp because of the habit of living in a state of crisis.
Keywords
crisis in psychology, reproducibility, history of psychology
Number of purchasers
4
Views
499
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000378-2-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 07.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Dvojnin A.M. Krizis v  psikhologii ili krizis identichnosti rossijskikh psikhologov? // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 6. C. 94–107. Dvoynin A.M. Krizis v psihologii ili krizis identichnosti rossijskih psihologov? // Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2015. Vol. 36. № 6. P. 94–107.
    2. 

  2. Mazilov V.A. Krizis v psikhologii: konstruktivnaya rol' v professional'nom soobschestve // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2015. № 2 (9). C. 22–33. Mazilov V.A. Krizis v psihologii: konstruktivnaya rol’ v professional’nom soobshhestve // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psihologiya.
    3. 

  3. Boutilier R.G., Roed J.C., Svendsen A.C. Crises in the two social psychologies: A critical comparison // Social Psychology Quarterly. 1980. № 1 (43). P. 5–17.
    4. 

  4. Dafermos M. Rethinking the crisis in social psychology: A dialectical perspective // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2015. № 8 (9). P.  394– 405.
    5. 

  5. Driver-Linn E. Where is psychology going? Structural fault lines revealed by psychologists’ use of Kuhn // American Psychologist. 2003. № 4 (58). P. 269– 278.
    6. 

  6. Earp B.D., Trafimow D. Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology // Quantitative Psychology and Measurement. 2015. (6). P. 621.
    7. 

  7. Elms A. C. The crisis of confidence in social psychology // American Psychologist. 1975. № 10 (30). P. 967–976.
    8. 

  8. Everett J.A.C., Earp B. D. A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers // Personality and Social Psychology. 2015. P. 1152.
    9. 

  9. Faye C. American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 2012. № 2 (43). P. 514–521.
    10. 

  10. Francis G. The psychology of replication and replication in psychology // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012. № 6 (7). P. 585–594.
    11. 

  11. Goertzen J. R. On the possibility of unification the reality and nature of the crisis in psychology // Theory & Psychology. 2008. № 6 (18). P. 829–852.
    12. 

  12. Henriques G. R. Psychology defined // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2004. № 12 (60). P. 1207–1221.
    13. 

  13. Kimble G. A. Behaviorism and unity in psychology // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2000. № 6 (9). P. 208–212.
    14. 

  14. Koole S. L., Lakens D. Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012. № 6 (7). P. 608–614.
    15. 

  15. Lipsey M. W. Psychology: preparadigmatic, postparadigmatic, or misparadigmatic? // Science Studies. 1974. № 4 (4). P. 406–410.
    16. 

  16. Makel M. C., Plucker J. A., Hegarty B. Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012. № 6 (7). P. 537–542.
    17. 

  17. Open Science Collaboration. An open, large-scale, collaborative eóort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012. № 6 (7). P. 657–660.
    18. 

  18. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science // Science. 2015. № 6251 (349). P. aac4716.
    19. 

  19. Pancer S.M. Social psychology: The crisis continues // In D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical Psychology: An Introduction. London: Sage, 1997. P. 150–165.
    20. 

  20. Parker I. The crisis in modern social psychology: How to End It. London; New York: Routledge Kegan & Paul, 1989.
    21. 

  21. Pashler H., Harris C. R. Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012. № 6 (7). P. 531–536.
    22. 

  22. Proietto M., Lombardo G. P. The “crisis” of psychology between fragmentation and integration: The Italian case // Theory & Psychology. 2015. № 3 (25). P. 313–327.
    23. 

  23. Sherifl M. Crisis in social psychology: Some remarks towards breaking through the crisis // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1977. № 3 (3). P. 368–382.
    24. 

  24. Silverman I. Crisis in social psychology: The relevance of relevance // American Psychologist. 1971. № 6 (26). P. 583–584.
    25. 

  25. Staats A. W. Unifying psychology requires new infrastructure, theory, method, and a research agenda // Review of General Psychology. 1999. № 1 (3). P. 3–13.
    26. 

  26. Stroebe W., Postmes T., Spears R. Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012. № 6 (7). P. 670–688.
    27. 

  27. Stroebe W., Strack F. The Alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014. № 1 (9). P. 59–71.
    28.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate