Везде
DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN VERSION OF IMPLICIT POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT TEST
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
DEVELOPMENT OF RUSSIAN VERSION OF IMPLICIT POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT TEST
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000387-2-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000387-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
ANNA ZELYANINA  M. Padun O. Mitina
Abstract
Results of the development and validation of the “Implicit positive and negative affect test” (IPANAT) (Russian version) are presented. The test lets evaluate emotional states by indirect way, i.e. without the influence of attitude and motivational tendencies. The test is supposed to fix the automatic activation of the representation of emotional states in evaluating artificial words with the help of adjectives, which reflect positive and negative emotional states. It is shown that Russian version of IPANAT is the valid, reliable, easy in use instrument for researching implicit positive and negative affect.
Keywords
implicit affect, positive affect, negative affect, implicit methods.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
956
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Andreeva G.M. Psikhologiya sotsial'nogo poznaniya. M.: Aspekt-press, 2004. Andreeva G.M. Psihologiya social’nogo poznaniya. M.: Aspekt-press, 2004.
    2. 

  2. Goulman D. Ehmotsional'nyj intellekt. M.: AST, 2008. Goulman D. Jemocional’nyj intellekt. M.: AST, 2008.
    3. 

  3. Mitina O.V. Teoriya lichnosti kak vzaimodejstvie sistem / Predislovie k knige: Kul' Yu., Shtokh M. Sila sobstvennogo “Ya”. Sem' psikhogimnastik dlya bessoznatel'nogo. Khar'kov: Gumanitarnyj tsentr, 2015. S. 7–35. Mitina O.V. Teorija lichnosti kak vzaimodejstvie sistem / Predislovie k knige: Kul’ Ju., Shtoh M. Sila sobstvennogo “Ja”. Sem’ psihogimnastik dlja bessoznatel’nogo. Har’kov: Gumanitarnyj centr, 2015. P. 7–35.
    4. 

  4. Osin E.N. Izmerenie pozitivnykh i negativnykh ehmotsij: razrabotka russkoyazychnogo analoga metodiki PANAS // Psikhologiya: zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2012. Tom 9. № 4. S. 91–110. Osin E.N. Izmerenie pozitivnyh i negativnyh jemocij: razrabotka russkojazychnogo analoga metodiki PANAS // Psihologiya: zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2012. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 91–110.
    5. 

  5. Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Ehmotsional'nyj intellekt: russkoyazychnaya adaptatsiya testa Mehjera– Sehloveya–Karuzo (MSCEIT V2.0) [Ehlektronnyj resurs] // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: ehlektron. nauch. zhurn. 2009. № 6(8). URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrascheniya: 23.08.2016). Sergienko E. A., Vetrova I. I. Emocional'nyj intellekt: russkojazychnaya adaptaciya testa Mjejera–Sjeloveja– Karuzo (MSCEIT V2.0) [Elektronnyj resurs] // Psihologicheskie issledovaniya: jelektron. nauch. zhurn. 2009. № 6(8). URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashhenija: 23.08.2016).
    6. 

  6. Strelyau Ya., Mitina O., Zavadskij B., Babaeva Yu., Menchuk T. Metodika diagnostiki temperamenta (formal'no-dinamicheskikh kharakteristik povedeniya). Izd. 2. M.: Smysl, 2009. Streljau Ja., Mitina O., Zavadskij B., Babaeva Ju., Menchuk T. Metodika diagnostiki temperamenta (formal’no-dinamicheskih harakteristik povedeniya). Izd. 2. M.: Smysl, 2009.
    7. 

  7. Amaral D.G., Price J.L., Pitkanen A.C. Carmichael S.T. Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex // J.P. Aggleton (ed). The amygdala: neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction. New York: Wiley–Liss. 1992. P. 166.
    8. 

  8. Baumeister R.F., Tice D.M., Hutton D. G. Selfpresentation motivations and personality differences in self-esteem // Journal of Personality 1989. V. 57. P. 547–579.
    9. 

  9. Beiser M. Components and correlates of mental wellbeing // Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1974. V. 5. P. 320–27.
    10. 

  10. Brown J.D., Collins R. L., Schmidt G. W. Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988. V. 55. P. 445–453.
    11. 

  11. Clark L.A., Watson D. Mood and the mundane: Relations between daily life events and self-reported mood // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988. V. 54. P. 296–308.
    12. 

  12. Gray J.A., McNaughton N. The neuropsychology of anxiety. An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. London: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    13. 

  13. Gross J.J., Levenson R. W. Emotional suppression: physiology, self-report and expressive behavior // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993. P. 970–986.
    14. 

  14. Gross J.J., Thompson R. A. Emotion Regulation: Conceptual foundations // Handbook of Emotion Regulation / Ed. J.J. Gross. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2007. P. 3–24.
    15. 

  15. Kanner A. D., Coyne J.C., Schaefer C., Lazarus, R.P. Comparison of two models of stress measurement: daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events // Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1981. V. 4. № 1. P. 1–37.
    16. 

  16. LeDoux J.E. The Emotional Brain: the Mysterious Underpinning of Emotional Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
    17. 

  17. Leventhal H., Scherer K. The relationship of emotion to cognition: a functional approach to semantic controversy // Cognition and Emotion, 1987. V. 1. № 1. P. 3–28.
    18. 

  18. Quirin M., Kazén M., Kuhl J. When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. V. 97. P. 500–516.
    19. 

  19. Quirin M., Wróbel M., Norcini Pala A., Stieger S., Shanchuan D., Hicks J.A., Mitina O., Brosschot J., Kazén M., Lasauskaite-Schüpbach R., Silvestrini N., Steca P., Padun M.A., Kuhl J. A cross-cultural validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT): Results from ten nations across three continents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2016. R. 1–12.
    20. 

  20. Russell J. A., Carroll J.M. On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. // Psychological Bulletin. 1999. V. 125. P. 3–30.
    21. 

  21. Stone A.A. The association between perceptions of daily experiences and self-and spouse-rated mood. Journal of Research in Personality. 1981. V. 5. P. 510–522.
    22. 

  22. Strack F., Deutsch R. Ref lective and impulsive determinants of social behavior // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004. V. 8. P. 220–247.
    23. 

  23. Tellegen A. Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report // Anxiety and the Anxiety Disorders (Eds A.H. Tuma, J. Mason). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1985. P. 681–706.
    24. 

  24. Van Schuur W.H., Kiers HA.L. Why factor analysis often is the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model to use instead // Applied Psychological Measurement. 1994. V. 18. P. 97–110.
    25. 

  25. Watson D. Basic problems in positive mood regulation // Psychological Inquiry. 2000. V. 11. P. 205–209.
    26. 

  26. Watson D. Positive affectivity: The disposition to experience pleasurable emotional states // C.R. Snyder, S.J. Lopez (eds). Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. P. 106–119.
    27. 

  27. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988. V. 54. № 6. P. 1063–1070.
    28. 

  28. Watson D., Clark L. A. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states // Psychological Bulletin. 1984. V. 96. P. 465–490.
    29. 

  29. Watson D., Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood // Psychological Bulletin. 1985. V. 98. P. 219–235
    30.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate