VALIDATION OF TWO RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE VERSIONS OF SELF-CONCEPTION QUESTIONNAIRES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
VALIDATION OF TWO RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE VERSIONS OF SELF-CONCEPTION QUESTIONNAIRES
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000392-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract

The results of validation of Russian language versions of questionnaires “The Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal and Relationships”and “Self Construal Scale ” are presented. Questionnaires' scales have high level of internal consistency. Correspondence of questionnaires' factor structures to theoretical ones was confirmed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Gender differences in scores correspond to the ones described in literature for the questionnaires. Correlations between scales of “Markers for the Big-Five factors” correspond to theoretically predicted. The results make it possible to consider Russian language versions of questionnaires as reliable and valid procedures.

Keywords
Collective, independent and relational self-conception
Number of purchasers
1
Views
763
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Knyazev G.G., Mitrofanova L.G., Bocharov V.A. Validizatsiya russkoyazychnoj versii oprosnika L. Goldberga "Markery faktorov "Bol'shoj pyaterki" // Psikhologicheskij zhurn. 2010. T. 31. № 5. S. 100110.
  2. Lebedeva N.M. Vvedenie v ehtnicheskuyu i kross-kul'turnuyu psikhologiyu. M.: Klyuch-S, 1999.
  3. Tuchina O.R. Fenomen samointerpretatsii lichnosti, tipy i izmerenie samointerpretatsii//Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanij. 2011. № 7. S. 183-193.
  4. Baumeister R.F. Public self and private self. New York, Springer, 1986.
  5. Brewer M. B., Gardner W. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996. V. 71. P. 83-93.
  6. Gabriel S., Gardner W.L. Are there “his” and “hers” types of interdependense? The implications of gender differensece in collective versus relational inde-pendense for affect, behavior and cognition//Journ. of Personality and Social Psichology. 1999. V. 77. P. 642-655.
  7. Gardner W.L., Gabriel S., and Lee A. “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment//Psychological Science. 1999. N. 10. R. 321-326.
  8. Cross S.E., Madson L. Models of the self: self-construals and gender//Psichology Bulletin, 1997. V. 122. P. 5-37.
  9. Cross S.E., Bacon P.L., Morris M.L. The Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal and Relationships//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. V. 78. N. 4. P. 791-808.
  10. Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  11. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R., Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale//Journ. of Personality Assesment. 1985. V. 49. N. 1. P. 71-75.
  12. Geertz C. On the nature anhropological understanding//American scientist. 1975. V. 63. P. 47-53.
  13. Greenwald A.G., Pratkanis A.R. The self. Handbook of the social cognitions. Hillsdaily, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984.
  14. Crowne D.P., Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology//Journ. of Consulting Psychology. 1960. V. 24. P. 349-354.
  15. James W. The principles of psychology//Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
  16. Kashima Y., Yamaguchi S., Kim U., Choi S., GelfandM.G., YukiM. Culture, gender and self: a perspective from individualism-collektivism research // Journ. of Personality and Social Psihology. 1995. V. 69. P. 925-937.
  17. Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psihological Review. 1991. V. 98. P. 224-253.
  18. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality instruments and observers//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. V. 52. P. 81-90.
  19. McGrath E., Keita G.P., Strickland B.R., Russo N.F. (Eds). Women and depression: Risk factors and treatment issues: Final report of the American Psychological Association's National Task Force on Women and Depression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1990.
  20. Hui C.H. Measurement of individualism-collectivism//Journ. of Research on Personality. 1988. V. 22. P. 17-36.
  21. Radloff L.S. The CES-D ScaleA Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population//Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977. V 1. N. 3. P. 385-401.
  22. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.
  23. Singelis T.M. The measuriment of independed and inter-depended self-construals//Personality and Social Psichology Bulletin. 1994. V. 20. P. 580-591.
  24. Scheier M.E., Carver C.S. Optimism, coping and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancy on health//Health Psychology. 1985. V. 4. P. 219-247.
  25. Triandis H.C. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psihological Review. 1989. V. 96. P. 506-520.
  26. Yuki M., Maddux W.W., Brewer M.B., Takemura K. Cross-cultural difference in relationship and group-based trust//Personality and Social Psichology Bulletin. 2005. V. 31. P. 48-62.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate