Везде
MAN'S TRUST AND DISTRUST TO TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MAN'S TRUST AND DISTRUST TO TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000392-8-
DOI
10.31857/S20000392-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
ALEXANDER OBOZNOV  ANNA AKIMOVA
ORCID: 0000-0002-5750-8409
Abstract
The authors approach to the study of psychological aspects of man's trust and distrust to technical equipment is presented. Comparative research of manifestation of trust and distrust to technical equipment in workers and users in different professional spheres has been conducted. Subjects' notions about characteristics of technical equipment which they trust or distrust, emotional experience and peculiarities of their behavior when interacting with equipment have been studied. Representatives of three groups of people who interact with technical equipment participated in the study: 382 locomotive drivers, 276 car drivers and 132 transport passengers (including 68 railway passengers and 64 car passengers). Overall sample consisted of 790 persons. It was defined that there were differences in criteria, emotional experience and behavioral manifestations of man's trust and distrust to technical equipment. Trust and distrust to technical equipment was proved to be interconnected but relatively independent psychological phenomena. Differences in subjective criteria of trust and distrust to technical equipment subject to different forms of interaction with it have been revealed.
Keywords
Interaction with technical equipment, psychological attitude, components of psychological attitude, criteria and manifestation of trust and distrust to technical equipment, man's trust and distrust to technical equipment
Number of purchasers
1
Views
588
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000392-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 13.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Akimova A.Yu. Metodika otsenki doveriya mashinista lokomotiva k tekhnike//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, 2013. T. 34. № 1. S. 109-120.
    2. 

  2. Akimova A.Yu. Predstavleniya voditelej o doverii i nedoverii avtomobilyu//Aktual'nye problemy psikhologii truda, inzhenernoj psikhologii i ehrgonomiki. Vyp. 6/Pod red. A. A. Oboznova, A. L. Zhuravleva. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014. S. 140-160.
    3. 

  3. Akimova A.Yu. Ehffektivnost' professional'noj deyatel'nosti rabotnikov s raznymi tipami doveriya tekhnike (na primere rabotnikov lokomotivnykh brigad). Avtoref. dis..kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2013.
    4. 

  4. Antonenko I.V. Gendernye osobennosti znachimosti doveriya v tipichnykh sotsial'nykh situatsiyakh//Psikhologiya obscheniya i doveriya: teoriya i praktika: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii URAO, PI RAO, MGU 6-7 noyabrya 2014 g./Pod red. T.P. Skripkinoj. M.: Universitet RAO, 2014. S. 69-74.
    5. 

  5. Babaeva Yu.D., Vojskunskij A.E., Kobelev V. V., Tikhomirov O. K. Dialog s EhVM: psikhologicheskie aspekty//Voprosy psikhologii, 1983. № 2. S. 2534.
    6. 

  6. Golikov Yu. Ya. Metodologiya psikhologicheskikh problem proektirovaniya tekhniki. M.: Per SEh, 2003.
    7. 

  7. Kuprejchenko A. B. Doverie i nedoverie tekhnike i sotsiotekhnicheskim sistemam: obosnovanie metodicheskogo podkhoda//Aktual'nye problemy psikhologii truda, inzhenernoj psikhologii i ehrgonomiki. Vyp. 4/Pod red. V.A. Bodrova, A.L. Zhuravleva. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012. S.331-350.
    8. 

  8. Kuprejchenko A. B. Psikhologiya doveriya i nedoveriya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008.
    9. 

  9. Kuprejchenko A. B., Tabkharova S. P. Doverie i nedoverie: soderzhanie, sootnoshenie, napravlennost'//Doverie i nedoverie v usloviyakh razvitiya grazhdanskogo obschestva/otv. red. A.B. Kuprejchenko, I.V. Mersiyanova. M.: Izdatel'skij dom NIU VShEh, 2013. S. 58-89.    
    10. 

  10. Kuprejchenko A. B., Tabkharova S. P. Kriterii doveriya i nedoveriya lichnosti drugim lyudyam//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, 2007. T. 28. № 2. S. 55-67.
    11. 

  11. Lomov B. F. Chelovek i tekhnika. M.: Sov. radio, 1966.
    12. 

  12. Oboznov A. A. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy formirovaniya professional'noj prigodnosti i nadezhnosti cheloveka v sotsiotekhnicheskikh sistemakh//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal, 2007. T. 28. № 5. S. 15-21.
    13. 

  13. Oboznov A. A., Akimova A. Yu. Doverie cheloveka tekhnike kak faktor nadezhnosti professional'noj deyatel'nosti//Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. Nauchnyj zhurnal Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2013. № 2. S. 225-331.
    14. 

  14. Oboznov A. A., Akimova A. Yu. Kontseptual'nye osnovaniya i metodicheskij podkhod k izucheniyu doveriya rabotnikov tekhnike (na primere mashinistov lokomotivnykh brigad)//Metody psikhologicheskogo obespecheniya professional'noj deyatel'nosti i tekhnologii razvitiya mental'nykh resursov cheloveka/Pod red. Dikoj L. G., Zhuravleva A. L., Kholodnoj M.A. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014. S. 62-75.
    15. 

  15. Skripkina T. P. Problema doveriya v otechestvennoj psikhologii//Psikhologiya obscheniya i doveriya: teoriya i praktika: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii URAO, PI RAO, MGU 6-7 noyabrya 2014 g./Pod red. T.P. Skripkinoj. M.: Universitet RAO, 2014. S. 48-51.
    16. 

  16. Skripkina T.P. Psikhologiya doveriya. Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij. M.: Izdatel'skij tsentr “Akademiya”, 2000.          
    17. 

  17. Khoroshilov B.M. Semantizatsiya mashiny kak "suschestva" vo vzaimodejstvii cheloveka i slozhnoj tekhniki v professional'noj deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2009. T. 3. Vyp. 1. S. 24-34.  
    18. 

  18. Hosmer L. T. Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics // Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 379-403.                 
    19. 

  19. Jian J.-Y., Bisantz A.M., Drury C.G. Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems // International Journ. of Cognitive Ergonomics. 2000. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 53-71.
    20. 

  20. Kramer R.M. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions//Annual Reviews Psychology. 1999. Vol. 50. P. 569-598.                 
    21. 

  21. Lee J., See K. Trust in technology: Designing for appropriate reliance // Journ. of Human Factors, 2004. Vol. 46. № 1. P. 50-58.
    22. 

  22. Lewandowsky S., Mundy M., Tan G.P.A. The Dynamics of Trust: Comparing Humans to Automation//Journ. of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2000. Vol. 6. P. 104-123.
    23. 

  23. Lewicki R.J., Mcallister D.J., Bies R. J. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities // Academy of Management Review. 1998. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 438-459.                 
    24. 

  24. Trust in Systems: Effects of Direct and Indirect Information/ed. by P. de Vries. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2004. Proefschrift.
    25.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate