Везде
REFLEXIVE CHARACTERISTIC ADAPTATIONS WITHIN THE FIVE-FACTOR THEORY OF PERSONALITY FRAMEWORK
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
REFLEXIVE CHARACTERISTIC ADAPTATIONS WITHIN THE FIVE-FACTOR THEORY OF PERSONALITY FRAMEWORK
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000402-9-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
SERGEY SHEBETENKO 
Abstract
The present article introduces the concept of reflexive characteristic adaptations within the framework of the five-factor theory of personality by R. McCrae and P. Costa. The concept deals with monitoring and processing opinions and beliefs about personality traits that individuals presumably have. Four types of the reflexive characteristic adaptations have been hypothetically proposed: trait efficacy (individuals opinions on how successful they are while responding to situations relevant to a trait), meta-trait (one’s opinion on how significant others see one’s traits), attitude toward trait (positive vs. negative evaluations of trait), meta-attitude toward trait (one’s opinions on attitudes toward the trait that significant others might have). One thousand thirty undergraduates aged from 17 to 38 years (including 339 men) fulfilled the Big Five Inventory and a number of its modifications that measured the reflexive characteristic adaptations. With few exceptions, the reflexive characteristic adaptations correlated positively with each other and the personality traits. However, multiple regression analyses revealed that meta-attitudes toward traits correlated negatively with corresponding traits while the remaining reflexive characteristic adaptations were controlled. The reflexive characteristic adaptations were shown to concern different aspects of a given personality trait and contribute to it incrementally. Future studies should address issues on mediations that reflexive characteristic adaptations may have within relationships between personality traits as basic tendencies and various external outcomes (objective biography). Another possible line of research concerns causal effects that reflexive characteristic adaptations can produce on various objective biography indicators.
Keywords
Personality traits, the five-factor theory of personality, self-reflection, individual differences, characteristic adaptations
Date of publication
04.11.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
663
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000402-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 17.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Vygotskij L.S., Luriya A.R. Ehtyudy po istorii povedeniya: Obez'yana. Primitiv. Rebenok. M: Pedagogika-Press, 1993.
    2. 

  2. Zimnyaya I.A. Problemy samootsenivaniya kak interiorizovannoj vneshnej otsenki v protsesse obucheniya // Kvalimetriya cheloveka i obrazovanie. Metodologiya i praktika. Kn. I. Ch. I. M., 1993. S.155-159.
    3. 

  3. Karpov A.V. Refleksivnost' kak psikhicheskoe svojstvo i metodika ee diagnostiki // Psikhol. zhurn. 2003. T. 24. № 5. S. 45-57.
    4. 

  4. Makarova N.G. Teoreticheskij aspekt samorefleksii lichnosti // A priori. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2013. № 1. S. 1-6.
    5. 

  5. Merlin V. S. Ocherk integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. M.: Pedagogika, 1986.
    6. 

  6. Novikova M.A., Kornilova T.V. "Psikhologicheskaya razumnost'" v strukture intellektual'nolichnostnogo potentsiala (adaptatsiya oprosnika) // Psikhol. zhurn. 2014. T. 35. № 1. S. 95-110.
    7. 

  7. Panteleev S.R. Samootnoshenie kak ehmotsional'no otsenochnaya sistema. M.: Nauka, 1991.
    8. 

  8. Rubinshtejn S.L. Osnovy obschej psikhologii. SPb.: Piter, 2000.
    9. 

  9. Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1983.
    10. 

  10. Ajzen G. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. Vol. 50. № 2. P. 179-211.
    11. 

  11. Bandura A. Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change // Psychological Review. 1977. Vol. 84. № 2. P. 191-215.
    12. 

  12. Bouchard T.J., McGue M. Genetic and rearing environmental influences on adult personality: An analysis of adopted twins reared apart // Journ. of Personality. 1990. Vol. 58. № 1. P. 263-292.
    13. 

  13. Carlson E.N., Vazire S., Furr M.R. Meta insight: Do people really know how others see them? // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011. Vol. 101. № 4. P. 831-846.
    14. 

  14. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.
    15. 

  15. Cumming G. The new statistics: Why and how // Psychological Science. 2014. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 7-29.
    16. 

  16. De Young C.G. Cybernetic Big Five theory // Journ. of Research in Personality. 2015. Vol. 56. № 6. P. 3358.
    17. 

  17. Farmer S.M., Van Dyne L. The idealized self and the situated self as predictors of employee work behaviors // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2010. Vol. 95. № 3. P. 503-516.
    18. 

  18. Felson R.B. Reflected appraisal and the development of self // Social Psychology Quarterly. 1985. Vol. 48. № 1. P. 71-78.
    19. 

  19. Funder D.C., Levine J.M., Mackie D.M., Morf C.C., Vazire S., West S.G. Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2014. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 3-12.
    20. 

  20. Gillespie A. Position exchange: The social development of agency // New Ideas in Psychology. 2012. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 32-46.
    21. 

  21. Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C., Amodio D.M., Gable P.A. Attitudes toward emotions // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011. Vol. 101. № 6. P. 1332-1350.
    22. 

  22. Jang K.L., Livesley W.J., Vemon P.A. Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study // Journ. of Personality. 1996. Vol. 64. № 3. P. 577-592.
    23. 

  23. John O.P., Donahue E.M., Kentle R.L. The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 5. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley; Institute of Personality and Social Research, 1991.
    24. 

  24. John O.P., Naumann L.P., Soto C.J. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues // Handbook of personality: Theory and research / Eds. O.P. John, R.W. Robins, L.A. Pervin. New York, NY: Guilford Press. 2008. P. 114-158.
    25. 

  25. Jost J.T., Kruglanski A.W., Nelson T.O. Social metacognition: An expansionist review // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 137-154.
    26. 

  26. Loehlin J.C. Genes and environment in personality development (Vol. XIV). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc., 1992.
    27. 

  27. Malloy T.E., Albright L., Kenny D.A., Agatstein F., Winquist L. Interpersonal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. Vol. 72. № 2. P. 390-398.    
    28. 

  28. Mayer, J.D., Panter, A.T., Caruso, D.R. Does personal intelligence exist? Evidence from a new ability based measure // Journ. of Personality Assessment. 2012. Vol. 94. № 2, P. 124-140.
    29. 

  29. McAdams, D.P., Pals, J.L. A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality // American Psychologist. 2006. Vol. 61. № 3. P. 204-217.
    30. 

  30. McCrae R.R., Costa Jr. P.T. Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five factor model of personality traits // Personality disorders and the five factor model of personality (3rd ed.) / Eds. T.A. Widiger, P.T. Costa. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, 2013. P. 15-27.
    31. 

  31. McCrae, R.R., Costa Jr., P.T. Personality in adulthood: A five factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2003.
    32. 

  32. McCrae R.R., Costa Jr. P.T. Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model // The Five-factor Model of Personality: Theoretical Perspectives / Ed. J.S. Wiggins. Guilford Press. 1996. pp. 51-87.
    33. 

  33. McCrae R.R., Costa Jr. P.T., Ostendorf F., Angleitner A., Hrebickova M., Avia M.D.,.. Smith P.B. Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 78. № 1. P. 173-186.
    34. 

  34. Nelson T.O., Narens L. Why investigate metacognition? // Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press. 1994. P. 1-25.
    35. 

  35. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models // Behavior Research Methods. 2008. Vol. 40. № 3. P. 879-891.
    36. 

  36. Schwarz N., StrackF., Mai H.-P. Assimilation and contrast effects in part whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1991. Vol. 55. № 1. P. 3-23.
    37. 

  37. Shchebetenko S. "The best man in the world": Attitudes toward personality traits // Psychology. Journ. of the Higher School of Economics. 2014. Vol. 11. № 3. P. 129-148.
    38.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate