Везде
CRISIS IN PSYCHOLOGY OR CRISIS OF RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS’ IDENTITY?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
CRISIS IN PSYCHOLOGY OR CRISIS OF RUSSIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS’ IDENTITY?
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000402-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
ALEXEY DOININ 
Abstract

               

The author’s view on problem of crisis in modern psychology is stated. Widespread among Russian psychologists appraisal of situation in world’s psychology as a crisis is doubted. The objective of the study is to establish whether this appraisal is true to the fact or it expresses only anxieties of domestic psychological community. Based on analysis of differences in methodological debates about crisis, holding in domestic and foreign psychology, the author reveals the causes and factors of experiencing crisis by Russian psychologists from the socio-cultural and psychological positions. The conclusion that statement of crisis in psychological science is concealing the crisis of identity of Russian psychologists is drawn. The author considers that world psychology is not in intra-science crisis. Meanwhile, it is stated that psychology as a cultural activity of a certain scientific communities is involved into global cultural and civili zational processes that are characterized at present as crisis. It is hypothesized that junior generation of Russian scientists is less exposed to identity crisis’s experiencing than the senior ones. The author considers intensional dialogue between junior and senior generations of domestic psychologists about methodological problems of psychology as an important condition for identity crisis overcoming.

Keywords
Crisis in psychology, crisis of identity, russian psychologists, methodological discussion, domestic psychology, foreign psychology
Date of publication
04.11.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
677
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Abul'khanova K. A. Metodologicheskij printsip sub'ekta: issledovanie zhiznennogo puti lichnosti // Psikhol. zhurn. 2014. T. 35. № 2. S. 5-18.
    2. 

  2. Aleksandrov I.O., Maksimova N.E. Zametki psikhologov issledovatelej o pozitsii metodologa (k stat'e A.V. Yurevicha "Psikhologiya i metodologiya", "Psikhologicheskij zhurnal", 2000, № 5) // Psikhol. zhurn. 2002. T. 23. № 1. S. 123-131.
    3. 

  3. Allakhverdov V.M. Ne pora li nynche, brat'ya psikhologi, nachat' novye pesni i ne rastekat'sya mysliyu po drevu? // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2004. T. 1. № 4. S. 113-125.
    4. 

  4. Allakhverdov V.M. Blesk i nischeta ehmpiricheskoj psikhologii (na puti k metodologicheskomu manifestu peterburgskikh psikhologov)// Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2005. T. 2. № 1. S. 44-65.
    5. 

  5. Allakhverdov V.M. Grustnyj optimisticheskij vzglyad na psikhologicheskuyu nauku // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2005. T. 2. № 1. S.130-139.
    6. 

  6. Allakhverdov V.M. Ot "metodologicheskogo odichaniya" psikhologov k svetlomu teoreticheskomu buduschemu // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2010. T. 7. № 4. S. 61-67.
    7. 

  7. Arsen'ev A.S. Filosofskie osnovaniya ponimaniya lichnosti. M.: Akademiya, 2001.
    8. 

  8. Bodalev A.A., Stolin V.V. O perestrojke v psikhologii // Psikhol. zhurn. 1988. T. 9. № 3. S. 16-25.
    9. 

  9. Vasilyuk F.E. Metodologicheskij smysl psikhologicheskogo skhizisa // Vopr. psikhol. 1996. № 6. S. 25-40.
    10. 

  10. Vygotskij L.S. Istoricheskij smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa // Sobranie sochinenij: v 6 t. M.: Pedagogika, 1986. T. 1. S. 291-436.
    11. 

  11. Garber I.E. Metapsikhologicheskij podkhod k integratsii psikhologii // Teoriya i metodologiya psikhologii: Postneklassicheskaya perspektiva / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2007. S. 484-502.
    12. 

  12. Gusel'tseva M.S. Postneklassicheskaya ratsional'nost' v kul'turnoj psikhologii // Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. T. 26. № 6. S. 5-15.
    13. 

  13. Gusel'tseva M.S. Metodologicheskie krizisy i tipy ratsional'nosti // Vopr. psikhol. 2006. № 1. S. 3-15.
    14. 

  14. Gusel'tseva M.S. Psikhologiya i istoriya: smena tipov ratsional'nosti // Vopr. psikhol. 2011. № 2. S. 13-24.
    15. 

  15. Danilova V.L. Problema sub'ekta psikhologicheskogo poznaniya // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly
    16. 

  16. Zavershneva E.Yu. Problema krizisa v sovremennoj psikhologii: istoriko metodologicheskoe issledovanie: Diss.. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2004.
    17. 

  17. Zelenkova T.V. O setevoj paradigme v psikhologii // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2007. T. 2. Vyp. 3. S. 18-28.
    18. 

  18. Zinchenko V.P. Krizis ili katastrofa? Psikhologiya i novye idealy nauchnosti (materialy "kruglogo stola") // Vopr. filosofii. 1993. № 5. S. 3-43.
    19. 

  19. Klochko V.E. Postneklassicheskaya nauka i problema ob'yasneniya v psikhologii // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2008. T. 3. Vyp. 1. S. 165-178.
    20. 

  20. Kol'tsova V.A. Aktual'nye problemy metodologii sovremennoj otechestvennoj psikhologicheskoj nauki // Psikhol. zhurn. 2007. T. 28. № 2. S. 5-18.
    21. 

  21. Kornilova T.V., Smirnov S.D. Metodologicheskie osnovy psikhologii. SPb.: Piter, 2006.
    22. 

  22. Krichevets A.N. Mnogoehtazhnaya psikhologiya. Ehskiznyj proekt // Mir psikhologii. 2005. № 3 (43). S.218-233.
    23. 

  23. Kurginyan S.S. Problema otnosheniya lichnosti k sebe v psikhologii (ot filosofsko psikhologicheskikh predstavlenij k nauchnoj teorii) // Mir psikhologii. 2010. № 4 (64). S. 41-53.   
    24. 

  24. Lange N.N. Psikhologiya. M.: Tovarischestvo “Mir”, 1914.
    25. 

  25. Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. 2-e izd. M.: Politizdat, 1977.
    26. 

  26. Mazilov V.A. Metodologicheskie problemy psikhologii v nachale XXI veka // Psikhol. zhurn. 2006. T. 27. № 1. S. 23-34.        
    27. 

  27. Mazilov V.A. Problema predmeta i metoda v psikhologii // Vopr. psikhol. 2007. № 1. S. 12-16.
    28. 

  28. Mazilov V.A. Metodologiya psikhologicheskoj nauki: problemy i perspektivy // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2007. T. 4. № 2. S. 3-21.
    29. 

  29. Mironenko I.A. Krizis psikhologii: permanentnyj i sistemnyj ili lokal'nyj? // Vopr. psikhol. 2008. № 4. S. 119-127.
    30. 

  30. Mironenko I.A. Sovremennaya rossijskaya psikhologiya v kontekste mirovoj psikhologicheskoj nauki // Vopr.psikhol. 2012. № 3. S.44-50.
    31. 

  31. Morozov S.M. O tak nazyvaemom sovremennom krizise v psikhologii // Psikhol. zhurn. 2010. T. 31. № 6. S. 98-106.
    32. 

  32. Motroshilova N.V. Tsivilizatsiya i varvarstvo v ehpokhu global'nykh krizisov. M.: Kanon+, 2010.     
    33. 

  33. Myasoed P.A. Psikhologiya v aspekte tipov nauchnoj ratsional'nosti // Vopr. psikhol. 2004. № 6. S. 3-18.
    34. 

  34. Pelipenko A.A. Global'nyj krizis i sud'by Zapada. M.: Znanie, 2014.
    35. 

  35. Piskoppel' A.A. Problema integratsii psikhologii: metod i podkhod // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2007. T. 2. Vyp. 1. S. 37-50.
    36. 

  36. Podd'yakov A.N., Val'siner Ya. Vybrat'sya iz nischety, ne teryaya bleska // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2005. T. 2. № 1. S. 102-111.
    37. 

  37. Sergienko E.A. Zakony metodologii neobkhodimy dlya nauki // Psikhologiya. Zhurn. Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2005. T. 2. № 1. S. 112-115.           
    38. 

  38. Smirnov S.D. Metodologicheskij plyuralizm i predmet psikhologii // Vopr. psikhol. 2005. № 4. S. 3-8.
    39. 

  39. Sokolova E.E. Apologiya sistemnogo monizma (K probleme putej integratsii psikhologicheskoj nauki) // Vopr. psikhol. 2006. № 4. S. 15-23.
    40. 

  40. Sokolova E.E. Neterpimost' tolerantnykh (Esche raz o monizme, plyuralizme i diskussiyakh o metodologicheskikh orientatsiyakh psikhologii) // Vopr. psikhol. 2008. № 3. S.138-143.
    41. 

  41. Sokolova E.E. Psikhologi na rasput'e: kakaya metodologiya nuzhna sovremennoj psikhologii? // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2008. T. 3. Vyp. 3. S. 25-42.
    42. 

  42. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie: Struktura, istoricheskaya ehvolyutsiya. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.
    43. 

  43. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obschie problemy. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, Triksta, 2006.
    44. 

  44. Surmava A.V. Psikhologicheskij smysl istoricheskogo krizisa // Vopr. psikhol. 2004. № 6. S. 7185.
    45. 

  45. Sukharev A.V. Metodologicheskij krizis v psikhologii - strategiya vykhoda // Psikhol. zhurn. 2012. T. 33. № 1. S. 141-142.
    46. 

  46. Teoriya i metodologiya psikhologii: Postneklassicheskaya perspektiva / Otv red. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2007.
    47. 

  47. Fel'dshtejn D.I. Psikhologo pedagogicheskie dissertatsionnye issledovaniya v sisteme organizatsii sovremennykh nauchnykh znanij // Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. 2011. № 2. S. 11-27.
    48. 

  48. Khomskaya E.D. O metodologicheskikh problemakh sovremennoj psikhologii // Vopr. psikhol. 1997. № 3. S. 112-125.
    49. 

  49. Yurevich A.V. Sistemnyj krizis v psikhologii // Vopr. psikhol. 1999. № 2. S. 3-11.
    50. 

  50. Yurevich A.V. Psikhologiya i metodologiya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2005.
    51. 

  51. Yurevich A.V. Nauka i paranauka: stolknovenie na "territorii" psikhologii // Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. T. 26. № 1. S. 79-94.
    52. 

  52. Yurevich A.V. Sotsiologiya psikhologii // Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2008. T. 3. Vyp. 3. S.
    53. 

  53. Yurevich A.V. Rossijskaya psikhologiya v mirovom mejnstrime // Vopr. psikhol. 2010. № 1. S. 3-14.
    54. 

  54. Bakan D. The crisis in psychology // Journ. of Social Distress and the Homeless. 1996. Vol. 5 (4). P. 335342.
    55. 

  55. Bower G.H. The fragmentation of psychology? // American Psychologist. 1993. Vol. 48 (8). P. 905907.
    56. 

  56. Buhler K. Die Krise der Psychologie. Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1927.
    57. 

  57. Dixon R.A. Theoretical proliferation in psychology: A plea for sustained disunity // The Psychological Record. 1983. Vol. 33. P. 337-340.
    58. 

  58. Driesch H. The crisis in psychology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1925.
    59. 

  59. Gruber H.E., Gruber S.L. Where is the crisis in psychology? // Journ. of Social Distress and the Homeless. 1996. Vol. 5 (4). P. 347-352.
    60. 

  60. Goertzen J.R. On the possibility of unification: The reality and nature of the crisis in psychology // Theory & Psychology. 2008. Vol. 18 (6). P. 829-852.
    61. 

  61. Kelly R.J. The crisis in psychology: Trouble in the temple // Journ. of Social Distress and the Homeless. 1998. Vol. 7 (3). P. 211-223.
    62. 

  62. Kostyleff N. La crise de la psychologie experimentale. Paris: Alcan, 1911.
    63. 

  63. Lewin K. The conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thought in contemporary psychology // Journ. of General Psychology. 1931. Vol. 5. P. 141-177.
    64. 

  64. Mc Kenzie-Mohr D., Oskamp S. (Eds.) Psychology and the promotion of a sustainable future. Journ. of Social Issues (special issue). 1995. Vol. 51 (4). P. 1-238.
    65. 

  65. Mos L.P. Why we should bring about a crisis in psychology // Journ. of Social Distress and the Homeless. 1996. Vol. 5 (4). P. 359-368.
    66. 

  66. Neisser U. The unity of psychology and of persons // International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology. 1995. Vol. 15. P. 6-12.
    67. 

  67. O’Connell D.C. Die krise der psychologie? // Journ. of Social Distress and the Homeless. 1996. Vol. 5 (4). P. 343-345.
    68. 

  68. Rieber R.W. The problem of psychological distress and the crisis in psychology // Psychology and Developing Societies. 2001. Vol. 13 (1). P. 105-121.
    69. 

  69. Salzinger K. How many discovers do we need to avoid a crisis in psychology? // Journ. of Social Distress and the Homeless. 1996. Vol. 5 (4). P. 353-357.
    70. 

  70. Sarason S.B. Psychology misdirected. New York: Free Press, 1981.
    71. 

  71. Staats A.W. Psychology’s crisis of disunity: Philosophy and method for a unified science. New York: Praeger, 1983.
    72. 

  72. Staats A.W. The disunity unity dimension // American Psychologist. 2004. Vol. 59 (4). P. 273.
    73. 

  73. Stam H.J. Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? // Journ. of Clinical Psychology. 2004. Vol. 60 (12). P. 1259-1262.
    74. 

  74. Sternberg R.J. Unifying the field of psychology // Unity in psychology: Possibility or pipedream? / R.J. Sternberg (Ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2005. P. 3-14.
    75. 

  75. Ward S.C. Modernizing the mind: Psychological knowledge and the remaking of society. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2002.
    76. 

  76. Willy R. Die Krisis in der Psychologie // Vierteljahrschrift fur wissenschaftliche Philosophie. 1897. Vol. 21. Part 1. P. 79-96; Part 2. P. 227-249; Part 3. P. 332-353.
    77. 

  77. Yanchar S.C., Slife B.D. Pursuing unity in a fragmented psychology: Problems and prospects // Review of General Psychology. 1997. Vol. 1. P. 235-255.
    78. 

  78. Yurevich A. Cognitive frames in psychology: demarcations and ruptures // Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science. 2009. Vol. 43 (2). P. 89-103.
    79. 

  79. Zittoun T., Gillespie A., Cornish F. Fragmentation
    80.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate