Везде
NEUROSCIENCE, PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
NEUROSCIENCE, PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000408-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
NATALIA ISKRA  OLGA CHUGUNOVA DARIA Gnedyh DIANA KURMAKAEVA NINA BORDOVSKAYA Svetlana N. Kostromina
Abstract
The main problems of interrelationship between neuroscience, psychology and education are discussed in this article. There are direct transferring results of neurophysiological studies in educational practice, misrepresentation and simplification of neurophysiological discoveries in pedagogical handbooks and existing of neuromyths in its. The reasons of gap between achievements of neuroscience and education are described. The ways out of this situation are proposed: interdisciplinary researches directed to the decision of education, caregiving and development problems should be conducted, workshops on cognitive neuroscience could be taken into pedagogical and psychological educational programs, psychology could be a connecting field for these mutual studies.
Keywords
Neuroscience, educational psychology, neurodidactics, educational neuroscience, neuromyths
Date of publication
03.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
761
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000408-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Aver'yanova N.V. Osobennosti psikhofiziologicheskogo razvitiya studentov v protsesse obucheniya na fakul'tetov estestvennonauchnogo i gumanitarnogo // Vestnik KemGU. 2014. T. 2. № 1 (57). S.90-96.
    2. 

  2. Aleksandrov Yu.I. Psikhofiziologicheskie zakonomernosti naucheniya i metody obucheniya // Psikhol. zhurn. 2012. T. 33. № 6. S. 5-19.
    3. 

  3. Arshavskij Yu.I. O roli nejronnykh setej i individual'nykh nejronov v rabote mozga // Sensornye sistemy. 2011. T. 25. № 1. S. 3-17.
    4. 

  4. Akhutina T.V., Pylaeva N.M. Preodolenie trudnostej ucheniya. SPb.: Piter, 2008.
    5. 

  5. Bezrukikh M.M., Farber D.A., Machinskaya R.I. Praktika i perspektivy shkol'nogo obucheniya v kontekste dostizhenij sovremennoj nauki o razvitii mozga rebenka // Shkol'naya biblioteka. 2006. № 6. S.10-23.
    6. 

  6. Vishnyova E.A., Grigor'eva L.P. Opoznanie zritel'nykh obrazov u detej s trudnostyami v obuchenii // Vestnik MGLU. 2011. Vypusk 7 (613). S. 24-36.
    7. 

  7. Gajnutdinov Kh.L., Andrianov V.V., Gajnutdinova T.Kh. Izmenenie vozbudimosti nejronal'noj membrany kak kletochnyj mekhanizm obucheniya i pamyati // Uspekhi fiziologicheskikh nauk. 2011. T. 42. № 1. S. 33-52.
    8. 

  8. Gorbachevskaya N.L. Davydova E.Yu., Petrova S.O., Tyushkevich S.A., Pashkevich O.I. Rol' biologicheskikh i sotsial'nykh faktorov v uspeshnosti shkol'nogo obucheniya // Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2010. T. 36. № 3. S. 66-73.
    9. 

  9. Dubrovinskaya N.V., Farber D.A., Bezrukikh M.M. Psikhofiziologiya rebenka: Psikhofiziologicheskie osnovy detskoj valeologii: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij. M.: Gumanit. izd. tsentr VLADOS, 2000.
    10. 

  10. Efimova V.L. Pedagogika M. Montessori s tochki zreniya fiziologii aktivnosti // Istoricheskaya i sotsial'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl'. 2014. № 2 (24). S.137-141.
    11. 

  11. Kaplunovich S.I. Ehksperimental'noe issledovanie faktorov razvitiya psikhologicheskoj kompetentnosti uchitelya // Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Yaroslava Mudrogo. 2008. № 48. 23-25.
    12. 

  12. Kovyazina M.S., Kuznetsova D.A. Nejropsikhologicheskij analiz mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodejstviya v neproizvol'nykh mnemicheskikh protsessakh // Vopr. psikhol. 2010. № 6. S. 126-132.
    13. 

  13. Kovyazina M.S., Kuznetsova D.A. Regulyatornye mekhanizmy fiksirovannoj ustanovki pri narusheniyakh mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodejstviya // Vopr. psikhol. 2012. № 4. S. 1-9.
    14. 

  14. Kozlova I.Yu. Ehlektroehntsefalograficheskie korrelyaty uspeshnosti kognitivnoj deyatel'nosti: Avtoreferat diss.. kand. med. nauk. SPb., 2010.
    15. 

  15. Kozlovskij S.A. Psikhofiziologicheskie mekhanizmy sokhraneniya zritel'nykh obrazov v rabochej pamyati: Avtoreferat diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2004.
    16. 

  16. Korsakova N.K., Mikadze Yu.V., Balashova E.Yu. Neuspevayuschie deti: nejropsikhologicheskaya diagnostika trudnostej v obuchenii mladshikh shkol'nikov. M., 1997.
    17. 

  17. Kostromina S.N., Prokof'eva V.V., Valej Zh.-L. Nejrofiziologicheskie parametry ehkzamenatsionnogo stressa u shkol'nikov: novyj ehtap v issledovanii staroj problemy // Peterburgskij psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. Vypusk 10. URL: http://ojs. spbu.ru/index.php/psy/article/view/74.
    18. 

  18. Luk'yanov A.N. Kognitivnaya sistema aktivatsii mozga, ee vliyanie na uspeshnost' obucheniya i formirovaniya sverkhsoznaniya // Vestnik obrazovatel'nogo konsortsiuma. Srednerusskij universitet. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2014. № 3. S. 50-52.
    19. 

  19. Mazilov V.A. Problema psikhologicheskoj podgotovki buduschikh pedagogov: prakticheskij aspekt // Integratsiya obrazovaniya. 2000. № 3. S. 23-24.
    20. 

  20. Makarova L.N. Nejropedagogicheskie usloviya razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya prepodavatelya i studenta // Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2014. T. 9. № 9. S. 159-166.
    21. 

  21. Malyshev D.A., Emel'yanova T.V. Pokazateli zritel'noj i slukhovoj pamyati u detej 7-8 let s raznym urovnem razvitiya ustnoj rechi // Novye issledovaniya. 2011. № 2 (27). S. 34-44.
    22. 

  22. Machinskaya R.I., Sugrobova G.A., Semenova O.A. Mezhdistsiplinarnyj podkhod k analizu mozgovykh mekhanizmov trudnostej obucheniya u detej. Opyt issledovaniya detej s priznakami SDVG // Zhurn. vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti. 2013. T. 63. № 5. S.542-564.
    23. 

  23. Saakyan O.S. Osobennosti ehlektricheskoj aktivnosti mozga yunoshej i devushek s raznym urovnem kreativnosti: Avtoreferat diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Rostov n/D, 2011.
    24. 

  24. Semenova O.V., Machinskaya R.I., Akhutina T.V., Krupskaya E.V. Mozgovye mekhanizmy proizvol'noj regulyatsii deyatel'nosti i formirovanie navyka pis'ma u detej 7-8 let // Fiziologiya cheloveka. 2001. T. 27. № 4. S. 23-30.
    25. 

  25. Khomskaya E.D. Nejropsikhologiya. SPb.: Piter, 2006.
    26. 

  26. Tsvetkova L.S., Semenovich A.V., Kotyagina S.N., Grishina E.G., Gogberashvili T.Yu. Aktual'nye problemy nejropsikhologii detskogo vozrasta / Pod red. L.S. Tsvetkovoj. Moskva - Voronezh, 2001.
    27. 

  27. Chernigovskaya T.V. Ot kommunikatsionnykh signalov k yazyku i myshleniyu cheloveka: ehvolyutsiya ili revolyutsiya? // Rossijskij fiziologicheskij zhurnal im. I.M. Sechenova. 2008. № 94 (9). S. 1017-1028.
    28. 

  28. Ansari D., Coch D. Bridges over troubled waters: education and cognitive neuroscience // TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences. 2006. V. 10. № 4. R. 146-151.
    29. 

  29. Ansari D., Coch D., Smedt B. Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? // Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2011. V. 43. № 1. R 37-42.
    30. 

  30. Arguel A., Jamet E. Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents // Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. № 25. R. 354-359.
    31. 

  31. Ayres P., Marcus N., Chan C., Qian N. Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations // Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. № 25 (2). R. 348-353.
    32. 

  32. Barad M. A Biological Analysis of Transference // UCLA Annual Review of Neuropsychiatry, Indian Wells, Calif. 2000.
    33. 

  33. Blakemore S.J., Frith U. The Learning Brain: Lessons for Education. UK: Oxford, Blackwell, 2005.
    34. 

  34. Brand M., Markowitsch H.J. Lernen und Gedachtnis aus neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive: Konsequenzen fur die Gestaltung des Schulunterrichts // Neurodidaktik: Grundlagen und Vorschlage fur ge- hirngerechtes Lehren und Lernen. / Ulrich Herrmann. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz. 2009. S. 69-85.
    35. 

  35. Bruer J.T. Education and the brain: a bridge too far // Educational Research. 1997. № 26. R. 4-16.
    36. 

  36. Buonomano D.V., Merzenich M.M. Cortical Plasticity: From Synapses to Maps // Annual Review of Neuroscience. 1998. № 21. R. 149-186.
    37. 

  37. Byrnes J.P. Minds, Brains and Learning. New York: Guilford Press, 2001.
    38. 

  38. Coch D., Ansari D. Thinking About Mechanisms is Crucial to Connecting Neuroscience and Education // Cortex. 2009. № 45. R 546-547.
    39. 

  39. Cohen I., Goldsmith M. Hands On: How to Use Brain GymR in the Classroom / Hands On Books. South Africa, Sea Point, 2000.
    40. 

  40. Collette T., van der Linden M., Laureys S., Delfio- re G., Degueldre C., Luxen A., et al. Exploring the unity and diversity of the neural substrates of executive functioning // Human Brain Mapping. 2005. № 2. R 409-423.
    41. 

  41. Cowan W.M., Kandel E.R. A Brief History of Synapses and Synaptic Transmission / In W.M. Cowan, T.C. Sudhof, and C.F. Stevens (eds.), Synapses. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2001.
    42. 

  42. Cozolino L., Sprokay S. Neuroscience and Adult Learning // New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 2006. № 110. R 11-20.
    43. 

  43. Davis M. Role of NMDA Receptors and MAP Kinase in the Amygdala in Extinction of Fear: Clinical Implications for Exposure Therapy // European Journal of Neuroscience. 2002. № 16. R 395-398.
    44. 

  44. Economic and Social Research Council Teaching and Learning Research Programme (ESRC TLRP) seminar series Collaborative Frameworks for Neuroscience and Education // Education and Brain Research: Neuroscience, Teaching and Learning conference. 25-27 July 2005. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK.
    45. 

  45. Fischer K.W., Daley S. Connecting cognitive science and neuroscience to education: Potentials and pitfalls in inferring executive processes // Understanding executive function: Implications and opportunities for the classroom / L. Meltzer (Ed.), New York: Guilford. 2006. R 55-72.
    46. 

  46. Goswami U. Neuroscience and Education // British Journ. of Educational Psychology. 2004. № 74. R. 1-14.
    47. 

  47. Goswami U. Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? // Nature Review Neuroscience. 2007. № 7. R 406-413.
    48. 

  48. Kegan R. What Form Transforms? A Constructive- Developmental Approach to Transformational Learning // Learning as Transformation / J. Mezirow and Associates (eds.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2000.
    49. 

  49. Kele§ E., Qepn{ S. Brain and Learning // Journ. of Turkish science education. 2006. V. 3. Is. 2. R. 31-34.
    50. 

  50. Mason L. Bridging neuroscience and education: A two-way path is possible // Cortex. 2009. № 45. R. 548-549.
    51. 

  51. Miyake A., Friedman N., Emerson M., Witzki A., Howerter A. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis // Cognitive Psychology. 2000. № 41. R 49-100.
    52. 

  52. Molfese V., Molfese P., Molfese D., Rudasill K. Executive function skills of 6 to 8 year olds: Brain and behavioral evidence and implications for school achievement // Contemporary Educational Psychology: Special Issue on Brain and Academic Development. 2010. № 35. R 116-153.
    53. 

  53. Morris J.S., Ohman A., Dolan R.J. A Subcortical Pathway to the Right Amygdala: Mediating ‘Unseen' Fear // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999. № 96. P. 1680-1685.
    54. 

  54. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) / Understanding the brain: Toward a new science. Paris: OECD. 2002.
    55. 

  55. Paulesu E. et al. Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity // Science. 2001. № 291. R. 21652167.
    56. 

  56. Posner M.I., Rothbart M.K. Influencing brain networks: implications for education // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005. № 9. R. 99-103.
    57. 

  57. Rose D.H., Meyer A., Strangman N., Rappolt G. Teaching everystudent in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. 2002.
    58. 

  58. Sabitzer B. Neurodidactics: Brain-based Ideas for ICT and Computer Science Education // The International Journ. of Learning. 2011. № 6. V. 18. Is. 2. R 167-178.
    59. 

  59. Schrott L.M. Effect of Training and Environment on Brain Morphology and Behavior // Acta Paediatrica Scandanavia. 1997. № 422 (Suppl). R 45-47.
    60. 

  60. Siok W.T., Perfetti C.A., Jin Z., Tan L.H. Biological abnormality of impaired reading is constrained by culture // Nature. 2004. № 431. R. 71-76.
    61. 

  61. Smith A. Accelerated Learning in the Classroom / Network Educational Press Ltd, Bodmin, UK, 1996.
    62. 

  62. Spitzer M. Lernen. Gehirnforschung und die Schule des Lebens Heidelberg: Spektrum - Akademischer Verlag, 2006.
    63. 

  63. Stern E. Frischer Wind im Klassenzimmer. [interv.] Hartwig Hanser and Steve Ayan // Gehirn and Geist. 2009. № 6. R. 60-65.
    64. 

  64. Szucsan D., Goswami U. Educational neuroscience: defining a new discipline for the study of mental representations // Mind, Brain, and Education. 2007. № 1. R 114-127.
    65. 

  65. Trojan S., Pokorny J. Theoretical Aspects of Neuroplasticity // Physiological Research. 1999. № 48 (2). R 87-97.
    66. 

  66. Turk D.J., Heatherton T.E, Kelley W.M., Funnell M.G., Gazzaniga M.S., Macrae C.N. Mike or me? Self-recognition in a split-brain patient // Nature Neuroscience. 2002. № 5. R 841-842.
    67. 

  67. Van Gog T., Paas F., Marcus N., Ayres P., Sweller J. The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations // Educational Psychology Review. 2009. № 21. R 21-30.
    68. 

  68. Vyasand A., Chattarji S. Modulation of Different States of Anxiety-Like Behavior by Chronic Stress // Behavioral Neuroscience. 2004. № 118(6). R. 14501454.
    69. 

  69. Wetzel C.D., Radtke P.H., Stern H.W. Instructional effectiveness of video media. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1994.
    70. 

  70. Wolf M., Katzir-Cohen T. Reading fluency and its intervention // Scientific Studies of Reading. 2001. № 5. P. 211-239.
    71. 

  71. Wolf M., Miller L., Donnelly K. Retrieval Automaticity, Vocabulary Elaboration Ortography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive fluency-based reading intervention program // Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2000. № 33. P. 375-386.
    72. 

  72. Wong A., Marcus N., Ayres P., Smith L., Cooper G.A., Paas F., et al. Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills // Computers in Human Behavior. 2009. № 25 (2). R. 339-347.
    73.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate