Везде
THE INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSMENT OF DWELLING FRIENDLINESS: "FUNCTIONALITY OF HOME ENVIRONMENT" QUESTIONNAIRE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE INSTRUMENT FOR ASSESSMENT OF DWELLING FRIENDLINESS: "FUNCTIONALITY OF HOME ENVIRONMENT" QUESTIONNAIRE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000408-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
NATALIA DMITRIEVA  EKATERINA BRAGINETS VALERIA KUZNETSOVA S. Reznichenko Sofya K. Nartova-Bochaver
ORCID: 0000-0002-8061-4154
Abstract
The importance to study and evaluate living environments, particularly home environments is discussed. It is noted that home (exactly dwelling) is a crucial environmental and social resource to maintain psychological well-being. The concept of friendliness of the home environment is introduced. Based on the theoretical review as well as using the laddering interview, the actualization constructs technique (G. Kelly's minimum context method) and the endless sentences method, there were 55 constructs identified that underlie developed by authors questionnaire ‘Functionality of dwelling environment'. In total, 592 respondents participated in the survey (221 male, 371 female, with average age of 16.3, Me = 18.4, SD = 5.2). The four factor structure of the questionnaire fits empiric data best and consists of 4 scales: Usability, Development, Stability, and Security. The primary psychometric characteristics of the tool are described. The prospects of its application are sketched.
Keywords
Home environment, friendliness, functionality, ecological validity, well-being, laddering interview, the minimum context method, questionnaire, development, стабильность, stability, security, usability
Date of publication
03.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
734
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000408-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Astanina N.B. Osobennosti fenomena doveriya u nesovershennoletnikh pravonarushitelej muzhskogo pola: Avtoref. diss.. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2010.  
    2. 

  2. Bochaver A.A. Issledovaniya zhiznennogo puti cheloveka v sovremennoj zarubezhnoj psikhologii//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2008. T. 29. № 5. S. 54-62.
    3. 

  3. Bochaver A.A. Metafora kak sposob vnutrennej reprezentatsii zhiznennogo puti lichnosti: Avtoref. diss.. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2010.
    4. 

  4. Bochaver A.A. Metafora doma kak otrazhenie lichnostnoj identichnosti//Lichnostnaya identichnost': vyzovy sovremennosti: materialy Vseros. psikhol. nauch.-prakt. konf. (s inostrannym uchastiem)/Pod red. Z.I. Ryabikinoj i V.V. Znakova. Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. un-t, Majkop: Adygejskij gos. un-t; M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014. S. 182-183.
    5. 

  5. Vysokovskij A.A. Uyut -ne geroj//Zhilische v Rossii: vek XX. Arkhitektura i sotsial'naya istoriya/Pod red. U. Brumfil'da i B. Rubla. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2002. S. 162-183.
    6. 

  6. Dmitrieva N.S. Individual'no-lichnostnye osobennosti podrostkov kak prediktor potrebnosti v bezopasnosti domashnej sredy//VI Rossijskaya konferentsiya po ehkologicheskoj psikhologii. Tezisy. (Moskva, 25-26 oktyabrya 2012 g.)/Pod red. M.O. Mdivani. M.: FGNU “Psikhologicheskij institut” RAO, 2012. S. 126.
    7. 

  7. Dmitrieva N.S. Model' zhiznennogo prostranstva u podrostkov: predposylki i napravleniya issledovaniya//Aktual'nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. 2013. № 3 (28). S. 90-99.
    8. 

  8. Dmitrieva N.S. Domashnyaya sreda i psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie podrostkov//Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyj universitet upravleniya). 2014. № 17. S. 292-299.
    9. 

  9. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. V razvitie idej L.I. Antsyferovoj o metodologii prakticheskoj psikhologii lichnosti//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 6. S. 35-45.
    10. 

  10. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Ponyatie “psikhologicheskoe prostranstvo lichnosti”: obosnovanie i prikladnoe znachenie//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. № 6. S. 27-36.
    11. 

  11. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Teoriya privatnosti kak napravlenie zarubezhnoj psikhologii//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2006. T. 27. № 5. C. 28-39.
    12. 

  12. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Bochaver K.A., Bochaver S.Yu. Zhiznennoe prostranstvo sem'i: ob'edinenie i razdelenie. M.: Genezis, 2011.
    13. 

  13. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Braginets E.I. Osobennosti vospriyatiya domashnej sredy roditelyami detej s OVZ//Lichnostnaya identichnost': vyzovy sovremennosti: materialy Vseros. psikhol. nauch.-prakt. konf. (s inostrannym uchastiem)/Pod red. Z.I. Ryabikinoj i V.V. Znakova. Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. un-t, Majkop: Adygejskij gos. un-t; M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”; 2014. S. 196-197.
    14. 

  14. Reznichenko S.I. Mekhanizmy privyazannosti k zhilomu prostranstvu u detej mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta//Aktual'nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. 2013. № 2. S. 24-40.
    15. 

  15. Reznichenko S.I. Obraz zhilogo prostranstva kak sotsial'no-psikhologicheskij fenomen. Sub'ekt zhilogo prostranstva//Lichnost' i bytie: sub'ektnyj podkhod (k 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A.V. Brushlinskogo): materialy VI Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (s inostrannym uchastiem)/Pod red. Z.I. Ryabikinoj, V.V. Znakova. M., Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. un-t, 2013. S. 77-79.
    16. 

  16. Reznichenko S.I. Privyazannost' k mestu i chuvstvo mesta: modeli i fenomeny//Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obschestvo. 2014. T. 5. № 3. S. 15-27.
    17. 

  17. Reznichenko S.I. Psikhologicheskie konstrukty, sostavlyayuschie osnovu formirovaniya privyazannosti cheloveka k zhiloj srede//VI Rossijskaya konferentsiya po ehkologicheskoj psikhologii. Tezisy. (Moskva, 25-26 oktyabrya 2012 g.)/Pod red. M.O. Mdivani. M.: FGNU “Psikhologicheskij institut” RAO, 2012. S. 348-351.
    18. 

  18. Reznichenko S.I. Fenomenologiya identifikatsii s mestom//Lichnostnaya identichnost': vyzovy sovremennosti: materialy Vseros. psikhol. nauch.-prakt. konf. (s inostrannym uchastiem)/Pod red. Z.I. Ryabikinoj i V.V. Znakova. Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. un-t, Majkop: Adygejskij gos. un-t; M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”; 2014. S. 200201.     
    19. 

  19. Smolova L.V. Psikhologiya vzaimodejstviya s okruzhayuschej sredoj. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj institut psikhologii i sotsial'noj raboty, 2010.
    20. 

  20. Chesnokova L.V. Gemutlichkeit (uyut) kak odin iz klyuchevykh kontseptov nemetskoj kul'tury//Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 8. S. 1121-1130.
    21. 

  21. Shtejnbakh Kh.Eh., Elenskij V.I. Psikhologiya zhiznennogo prostranstva. SPb.: Rech', 2004.
    22. 

  22. Arbucke J.L., Worthke W. Amos 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation, 1999.
    23. 

  23. Bentler P.M. On tests and indices for evaluating structural models//Personality and Individual Differences. 2007. V. 42. № 5. P. 825-829.
    24. 

  24. Costall A. Sozialing affordances//Theory and Psychology. 1995. № 5. P. 467-481.
    25. 

  25. Coolen H. The Meaning of Dwelling features: conceptual and Methodological Issues. Sustainable Urban areas, 2008. V. 24. Delft: Delft University Press.
    26. 

  26. Coolen H. The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice. New York: Springer. 2011.
    27. 

  27. Greeno J.G. Gibson's affordances//Psychological review. 1994. V. 101. P. 336-342.
    28. 

  28. Heft H. Ecological Psychology in Context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2001.
    29. 

  29. Kytta M. The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments//Journal of environmental Psychology. 2004. V. 24. P. 179-198.
    30. 

  30. Lawton M.P. Residential environment and self-direct-edness among older people//American Psychologist. V. 45. № 5. P. 638-640.
    31. 

  31. Marquardt G. Dementia-Friendly Architecture: Integrating Evidence in Architectural Design//Edgerton E., Romice O., Thwaites K. (Eds.) Bridging the Boundaries. Advances in People-Environment Studies. 2014. V. 5. P. 33-46.
    32. 

  32. Mason M., Cheung I., Walker L. Substance Use, Social Networks and the Geography of Urban Adolescents//Substance Use & Misuse. 2004. V. 39. №. 10-12. P. 1751-1777.
    33. 

  33. Morgan P. Towards a developmental theory of place attachment//Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010. V. 30. P. 11-22.
    34. 

  34. Nordstrom M. Young People's Attachment to Place//Edgerton E., Romice O., Thwaites K. (Eds.) Bridging the Boundaries. Advances in People-Environment Studies. 2014. V. 5. P. 73-82.
    35. 

  35. Ritchie L., Edgerton E. Objective and Subjective Impressions of an Environmental Intervention in Dementia Care Homes//Edgerton E., Romice O., Thwaites K. (Eds.) Bridging the Boundaries. Advances in People-Environment Studies. 2014. V. 5. P. 47-58.
    36. 

  36. Savage M., Warde A., Ward K. Urban sociology, capitalism and modernity. N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
    37. 

  37. Tennant R., Hiller L., Fishwick R., Platt S., Joseph S., Weich S., Parkinson J., Secker J., Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEM-WBS): development and UK validation//Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2007. V. 5. № 63. URL: http://www.hqlo.com/content/5/1/63 (data obrascheniya: 28.01.2015 g.).
    38.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate