Везде
PSYCHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR'S EXPLANATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PSYCHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR'S EXPLANATION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000525-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V. Latynov 
Abstract
The results of empiric study of factors of effectiveness of apologization of unethical behavior (N=153) are presented. The participants were asked to assess person's behavior via “Behavior in ethically ambiguous situations” procedure. Adapted on Russian sample F. Brady's questionnaire of ethical dispositions, questionnaire “Belief in Just World”, trust to people index, ethical cynicism index were used for diagnostics of personal characteristics. In was shown that besides “quality” of apologization's modes their effectiveness depend on person's psychological characteristics on whom this modes are directed at. In this respect, world-vision (justice, locus of control, trust to people) and ethical (ethical formalism, utilitarianism, ethical cynicism) person's characteristics proved to be significant ones.
Keywords
Influence, object of influence, message, apology, ethical attitudes, belief in just world, apologization, excuse
Date of publication
03.01.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
738
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Diskurs v sovremennom mire. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya/Pod. red. N.D. Pavlovoj., I.A. Zachyosovoj. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2011.
    2. 

  2. Latynov V.V. Psikhologiya kommunikativnogo vozdejstviya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013.
    3. 

  3. Latynov V.V. Rechevye formy apologizatsii neehtichnogo povedeniya//Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2012. № 2. S. 144-149.
    4. 

  4. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Astanina N.B. Psikhologicheskie problemy spravedlivosti v zarubezhnoj personologii: teorii i ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 1. S.16-32.
    5. 

  5. Bachman G.F., Guerrero L.K. Forgiveness, apology, and communicative responses to hurtful events//Communication Reports. 2006. V. 19. P. 45-56.
    6. 

  6. Barkan E., Karn A. (Eds.). Taking wrongs seriously: Apologies and reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.
    7. 

  7. Benoit W.L. President Bush's image repair effort on Meet the Press: The complexities of defeasibility//Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2006. V. 34. P. 285-306.
    8. 

  8. Brady F.N. Ethical managing: Rules and results. N.Y.: Macmillan, 1990.
    9. 

  9. Brady F.N., Wheeler G.E. An empirical study of ethical predispositions//Journal of Business Ethics. 1996. V. 15. P. 927-940.
    10. 

  10. Brinol P., Petty R.E. Individual differences in persuasion//The Handbook of Attitudes and Attitude Change/D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, M. P. Zanna (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 2005. P. 575-616.
    11. 

  11. Burns J.P., Bruner M.S. Revisiting the theory of image restoration strategies//Communication Quarterly. 2000. V. 48. P. 27-39.
    12. 

  12. Chang C. Self-congruency as a cue in different advertising-processing contexts//Communication Research. 2002. V. 29. P. 503-536.
    13. 

  13. DeBono K.G., McDermott J.B. Trait anxiety and persuasion: Individual difference in information processing strategies//Journal of Research in Personality. 1994. V. 28. P. 395-411.
    14. 

  14. Fehr R., Gelfand M.J. When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims' self-construals facilitates forgiveness//Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2010. V. 113. Issue 1. P. 37-50.
    15. 

  15. Felson R.B., Ribner S.A. An attributional approach to accounts and sanctions for criminal violence//Social Psychology Quarterly. 1981. V. 44. No. 2. P. 137142.
    16. 

  16. Geers A.L., Handley I.M., McLarney A.R. Discerning the role of optimism in persuasion: The valenceenhancement hypothesis//Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003. V. 85. P. 554565.
    17. 

  17. Hearit K. M. Crisis management by apology: Corporate response to allegations of wrongdoing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2006.
    18. 

  18. Hearit K.M., Brown J. Merrill Lynch: Corporate apologia and business fraud//Public Relations Review. 2004. V. 30. P. 459-466.
    19. 

  19. Moon Y. Personalization and personality: Some effects of customizing message style based on consumer personality//Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2002. V. 12. P. 313-326.
    20. 

  20. Renteln A.D. Apologies: A cross-cultural analysis. In M. Gibney, R.E. Howard-Hassmann, J-M. Coicaud, N. Steiner (Eds.) The age of apology: Facing up to the past (pp. 61-76). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.
    21. 

  21. Rhodes N., Wood W. Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception//Psychological Bulletin. 1992. V. 111. P. 156-171.
    22. 

  22. Riordan C.A., Marlin N.A., Kellogg R.T. The effectiveness of accounts following transgression//Social Psychology Quarterly. 1983. V. 46. No. 3. P. 213219.
    23. 

  23. Riordan C.A., Marlin N.A., Gidwani C. Accounts for unethical research practices: Effects on the evaluations of acts and actors//Journal of Social Psychology. 1988. V. 128. P. 495-505.
    24. 

  24. Rubin Z., Peplau L.A. Who believes in a just world?//Journal of Social Issues. 1975. V. 31. P. 65-89.
    25. 

  25. Ryan S., Bisel R.S., Messersmith A.S. Organizational and supervisory apology effectiveness apology giving in work settings//Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 2012. V. 75. No. 4. P. 425448.
    26. 

  26. Sigal J., Hsu L., Foodim S., Betman J. Factors affections perceptions of political candidates accused of sexual and financial misconduct//Political Psychology. 1988. V. 9. P. 273-280.
    27. 

  27. Smith N. I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
    28. 

  28. Snyder M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior//Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974. V. 30. P. 526-537.
    29. 

  29. Snyder M., DeBono K.G. Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising//Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985. V. 49. P. 586-597.
    30. 

  30. Tedeschi J.T., Riordan C.A., Gaes G.G., Kane T. Verbal accounts and attributions of social motives//Journal of Research in Personality. 1983. V. 17. P. 218-225.
    31. 

  31. Wooten D.B. Say the right thing:Apologies, reputability, and punishment//Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2009. V. 19. P. 225-235.
    32.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate