Везде
SOCIAL BELIEFS AND MOTIVATION TO LEARN: THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SOCIAL BELIEFS AND MOTIVATION TO LEARN: THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000606-3-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000606-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
O. Gulevich 
Abstract
Correlation between motivation to learn and assessment of educational interaction's justice and social beliefs are examined. This study explores the relation between social beliefs, organizational justice evaluation and learning motivation. It was hypothesized that the higher students assess the justice of treatment with them and the lower their dangerous world and competitive world beliefs are the higher intrinsic motivation to learn will be. Therewith the influence of social beliefs is mediated by the educational justice evaluation. Participants were 895 students of the 1-st and the 4-th year from four Russian universities (54% female, M age = 19, SD age = 1.64). Three methods - measurement of belief in dangerous and competitive world; assessment of justice in conducting difficult credit/exam; motivation to learn in the university - were used in the research. They completed the Dangerous World Beliefs Scale, Jungle World Beliefs Scale, Organizational Justice Scale and Academic Motivation Scale.The results partly support hypotheses and demonstrate that the procedural justice evaluation moderates correlation between social beliefs and learning motivation.
Keywords
Theory of self-determination, motivation to learn, organizational justice, belief in dangerous and competitive world
Date of publication
03.05.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
696
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Bezmenova I.K., Gulevich O.A., Spiridonov V.F. Izmerenie spravedlivosti organizatsionnogo vzaimodejstviya // Zhurnal psikhologicheskogo obschestva im. L.S. Vygotskogo. 2009. № 2. S. 81-95.
    2. 

  2. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Osin E.N. Vnutrennyaya i vneshnyaya uchebnaya motivatsiya studentov: ikh istochniki i vliyanie na psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie // Voprosy psikhologii. 2013. № 1. S. 1-11.
    3. 

  3. Gulevich O.A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya spravedlivosti. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2011
    4. 

  4. Gulevich O.A., Anikeenok O.A., Bezmenova I.K. Sotsial'nye verovaniya: adaptatsiya metodiki Dzh. Dakkita // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2014
    5. 

  5. Gulevich O.A., Spiridonov V.F., Bezmenova I.K. Kak izmerit' spravedlivost' v organizatsii: metodika Dzh. Kolkitta // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. 2009. № 4. S. 67-79.
    6. 

  6. Spiridonov V.F., Gulevich O.A., Bezmenova I.K. Faktory, oposreduyuschie vospriyatie spravedlivosti organizatsionnogo vzaimodejstviya // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2010. № 1. S.130-137.
    7. 

  7. Bell B.S., Wiechmann D., Ryan A.M. Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2006. V. 91. P. 455-466.
    8. 

  8. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. V. 86. P. 386-400.
    9. 

  9. Cropanzano R., Rupp R.D., Mohler C.J., Schminke M. Three roads to organizational justice // Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. 2001. V. 20. P. 1-113.
    10. 

  10. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior // Psychological Inquiry. 2000. V. 11. P. 227268.
    11. 

  11. Duckitt J., Wagner C., du Plessis I., Birum I. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. V. 83. P. 75-93.
    12. 

  12. Federico C.M., Hunt C.V., Ergun D. Political expertise, social worldviews, and ideology: translating ''competitive jungles'' and ''dangerous worlds'' into ideological reality // Social Justice Research. 2009. V. 22. P. 259-279.
    13. 

  13. Gagne M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory and work motivation // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2005. V. 26. P. 331-362.
    14. 

  14. Gagne M., Forest J., Gilbert M.-H., Aube C., Morin E., Malorni A. The motivation at work scale: validation evidence in two languages // Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2010. V. 70. P. 628-646.
    15. 

  15. Jugert P., Duckitt J. A motivational model of authoritarianism: integrating personal and situational determinants // Political Psychology. 2009. V. 30. P. 693719.
    16. 

  16. Liao W.-C., Tai W.-T. Organizational justice, motivation to learn and training outcomes // Social Behavior and Personality. 2006. V. 34. P. 545-556.
    17. 

  17. Roberson Q.M., Stewart M.M. Understanding the motivational effects of procedural and informational justice in feedback processes // British Journal of Psychology. 2006. V. 97. P. 281-298.
    18. 

  18. Schaller M., Park. J.H., Mueller A. Fear of the dark: interactive effects of beliefs about danger and ambient darkness on ethnic stereotypes // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003. V. 29. P. 637-649.
    19. 

  19. Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., Robertson A. Differentiating the motivations and justifications underlying individual differences in Pakeha opposition to bicultural policy: replication and extension of a predictive model // New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 2007. V. 36. P. 25-33.
    20. 

  20. Van Hiel A., Cornelis I., Roets A. The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes // European Journal of Personality. 2007. V. 21. P. 131-148.
    21.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate