Везде
METHOD FOR DIAGNOSTICS OF PROPENSITY TO DESTRUCTIVE COMMUNICATION IN ADOLESCENTS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
METHOD FOR DIAGNOSTICS OF PROPENSITY TO DESTRUCTIVE COMMUNICATION IN ADOLESCENTS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000615-3-1
DOI
10.31857/S20000615-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
D. Mingazova  R. Fatyhova I. Nesterova
Abstract
Authors' questionnaire "Method for diagnostics of propensity to destructive communication" (MDPD) oriented to destructive form of problem communication in adolescents revealing is presented. Main types of destructive communication (deviant, selfish, barrier, conflict and narcissistic) are marked out. The assessment of psychometric qualities of the method, its adequacy for psychodiagnostic purposes was conducted in empiric study in secondary comprehensive schools of Bashkortostan Republic.
Keywords
Destructive communication, deviant communication, selfish communication, barrier communication, narcissistic communication, reliability, validity, factor analysis, conflict communication, discriminativity
Date of publication
03.05.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
728
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Arzhakaeva T.A. Psikhologicheskie trudnosti obscheniya nachinayuschikh uchitelej: Avtoref. dis.. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 1995.
    2. 

  2. Bodalev A.A., Kovalev G.A. Psikhologicheskie trudnosti obscheniya i ikh preodolenie // Pedagogika. 1992. № 5, 6. C. 65-70.
    3. 

  3. Bodalev A.A. Lichnost' i obschenie. M.: Pedagogika, 1983.
    4. 

  4. Burlachuk L.F. Psikhodiagnostika: Uchebnik dlya vuzov. SPb.: Piter, 2011.     
    5. 

  5. Baturin N.A., Mel'nikov N.N. Tekhnologiya razrabotki psikhodiagnosticheskikh metodik: monografiya. Chelyabinsk: izdatel'skij dom YuUrGU, 2012.                
    6. 

  6. Zimbardo F. Zastenchivost'. M.: Pedagogika, 1997.
    7. 

  7. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya pravdy. SPb.: Aletejya, 1999.
    8. 

  8. Kunitsyna V.N. Mezhlichnostnoe obschenie. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. SPb.: Piter, 2001.
    9. 

  9. Lysak I.V. Filosofsko-antropologicheskij analiz destruktivnoj deyatel'nosti sovremennogo cheloveka. R/n/D. - Taganrog: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh, Izd-vo TRTU, 2004.
    10. 

  10. Mendzheritskaya Yu.A. Osobennosti ehmpatii sub'ektov zatrudnennogo i nezatrudnennogo obscheniya v situatsiyakh zatrudnennogo vzaimodejstviya: Diss. kand. psikh. nauk. R/n/D, 1998.
    11. 

  11. Mingazova D.V. Sposoby vyyavleniya i diagnostiki destruktivnykh form obscheniya podrostkov // Osvgta regionu. 2011. № 3. C. 210-215.
    12. 

  12. Muzdybaev K. Psikhologiya zavisti // Psikhol. zhurn. 1997. № 6. C. 3-11.
    13. 

  13. Muzdybaev K. Ehgoizm lichnosti // Psikhol. zhurn. 2000. № 2. C. 27-39.
    14. 

  14. Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. Analiz i interpretatsiya dannykh. M.: Rech', 2004.            
    15. 

  15. Psikhologiya zatrudnennogo obscheniya: Teoriya. Metody. Diagnostika. Korrektsiya: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij. M.: Akademiya, 2001.
    16. 

  16. Sokolova E.T. Psikhologiya nartsissizma. M., 2001.
    17. 

  17. Fatykhova R.M. Kul'tura pedagogicheskogo obscheniya kak uslovie psikhologicheskoj bezopasnosti obrazovatel'noj sredy // Izvestiya RAO. 2012. № 2. C. 1389-1400.
    18. 

  18. Fatykhova R.M. Tolerantnost' v zerkale kul'tury i obrazovaniya // Pedagogicheskij zhurnal Bashkortostana. 2011. № 5. C. 40-54.
    19. 

  19. Di Cioccio R.L. The Development and Validation of the Teasing Communication Scale Human Communication // Pacific and Asian Communication Association. V. 11. No. 3. P. 255-272.
    20. 

  20. Rancer A.C., Avtgis T.A. Argumentative and Aggressive Communication: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage Publications, 2006.
    21.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate