Везде
RESEARCH AND PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY: ONCE MORE ABOUT SCHIZIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
RESEARCH AND PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY: ONCE MORE ABOUT SCHIZIS
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Yurevich 
Abstract
Present-day level of interaction between research and practical psychology, schizis between which is traditionally discussed by psychologists, is considered. Their imbalance is shown to remain in spite of observable cognitive and social tendencies to approachment. At the same time, according to the authors opinion, existing notion about schizis to a large extent is the result of inadequate expectations in respect of academic psychology as well as to underestimation of differences in social functions of fundamental and applied sciences.
Keywords
Research, academic and practical psychology, schizis, social relevance, social functions, fundamental and applied science, technology
Date of publication
03.01.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
658
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000616-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 09.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Allakhverdov V.M. Nauchnoe issledovanie kak trivializatsiya obosnovannoj akhinei//Teoriya i metodologiya psikhologii: postneklassicheskaya perspektiva. M., 2007. S. 174-194.   
    2. 

  2. Bekker G., Boskov A. Sovremennaya sotsiologicheskaya teoriya. M.: Progress, 1961.
    3. 

  3. Vasilyuk F.E. Metodologicheskij analiz v psikhologii. M., 2003.     
    4. 

  4. Vasilyuk F.E. Metodologicheskij smysl psikhologicheskogo skhizisa//Voprosy psikhologii. 1996. № 6. S. 25-40.
    5. 

  5. Vachkov I.V. Nuzhna li prakticheskomu psikhologu metodologiya?//Trudy yaroslavskogo metodologicheskogo seminara. Metodologiya psikhologii. Yaroslavl', 2003. S. 72-79.
    6. 

  6. Vizgin V.P. Istina i tsennost'//Tsennostnye aspekty razvitiya nauki. M., 1990. S. 36-51.
    7. 

  7. Vygotskij L.S. Istoricheskij smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa//Vygotskij L.S. Sobranie sochinenij v 6 tomakh. M., 1982. T. 1. S. 291-436.
    8. 

  8. Demograficheskij ezhegodnik Rossii. 2010. M.: Rosstat, 2010.
    9. 

  9. Zadorin M. Apologiya "prikladnosti", ili Esche raz o professionalizme, professii i professional'nom soobschestve//Sotsial'naya real'nost'. 2007. № 5. S. 65-74.   
    10. 

  10. Karitskij I.N. Metodologiya prakticheskoj psikhologii//Trudy yaroslavskogo metodologicheskogo seminara. Metodologiya psikhologii. Yaroslavl', 2003. S. 135-158.
    11. 

  11. Kollingvud R.Dzh. Ideya istorii. M., 1980.
    12. 

  12. Kornilova T.V. Oznachaet li svobodnaya konkurentsiya idej otkaz ot kriteriev nauchnosti v psikhologii//Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2007. T. 2. Vyp. 3. S. 120-129.
    13. 

  13. Makropsikhologiya sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva/Pod red. A.L. Zhuravleva, A.V. Yurevicha. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2009.
    14. 

  14. Malki M. Znanie i poleznost': implikatsii dlya sotsiologii znaniya//Znanie: sobstvennost' i vlast'. Khrestomatiya/Pod red. V.A. Sadovnichego. M.: ISPI RAN, 2010. S. 91-111.
    15. 

  15. Mironenko I.A. O kontseptsii predmeta psikhologicheskoj nauki//Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2006. № 1. S. 160-173.
    16. 

  16. Petrenko V.F. Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v psikhologicheskoj nauke//Teoriya i metodologiya psikhologii: postneklassicheskaya perspektiva. M., 2007. S. 119-135.
    17. 

  17. Pruzhinin B.I. Dva ehtosa sovremennoj nauki: problemy vzaimodejstviya//Ehtos nauki. M., 2008. S. 108-121.
    18. 

  18. Rossijskij statisticheskij ezhegodnik. 2010. M.: Rosstat, 2010.
    19. 

  19. Semenov V.E. Sovremennye metodologicheskie problemy v rossijskoj sotsial'noj psikhologii//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2007. № 1. S. 38-45.
    20. 

  20. Sirotkina I.E., Smit R. "Psikhologicheskoe obschestvo": k kharakteristike fenomena//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2006. № 1. S. 114-121.
    21. 

  21. Khoziev V.B. K voprosu o meste konsul'tativnogo metoda issledovaniya//Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2007. Vyp. 1. S. 190-200.
    22. 

  22. Kh'ell L., Zigler D. Teorii lichnosti. SPb., 1997.
    23. 

  23. Schedrovitskij G.P. Metodologicheskaya organizatsiya sfery psikhologii//Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2007. T. 2. Vyp. 3. S. 133-151.
    24. 

  24. Yurevich A.V. Metodologiya i sotsiologiya psikhologii. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2010.
    25. 

  25. Adam B., Loon Van J. Introduction: Repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory//The risk society and beyond. London, 2000. R. 1-31.
    26. 

  26. Bandura A. Aggression: A social-learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973.
    27. 

  27. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
    28. 

  28. Bunge M. Technology as applied science//Technology and Culture. 1967. № 8. R. 329-347.
    29. 

  29. Coolican H. Research methods and statistics in psychology. London, 1998.
    30. 

  30. European Mortality Database. 2011. URL: http://data. euro.who.int/hfamdb/
    31. 

  31. Eurostat Database. 2011. URL: http://epp.eurostat. ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_ database
    32. 

  32. Gergen K.J. Toward a Postmodern Psychology//Psychology and Postmodernism/Ed. by S. Kvales. L.: Sage Publications, 1994. R. 17-30.
    33. 

  33. Harre R. The positivist-empiricist approach and its alternative//Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research. Chichester, 1981. R. 20-48.
    34. 

  34. Langrish J. et al. Wealth from Knowledge. London: Macmillan, 1972.
    35. 

  35. Layton E. Conditions and Technological Development, in Science, Technology and Society. London: Sage. R. 210.
    36. 

  36. Materials Advisory Board, Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Principles of Research-Engineering Interaction. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1966.
    37. 

  37. Moscovici S. Society and theory in social psychology//The context of social psychology: A critical assessment. N.Y., 1972.
    38. 

  38. Polkinhorne D.E. Postmodern Epistemology of Practice//Psychology and Postmodernism/Ed. by S. Kvales. L.: Sage Publications, 1994. R. 146-165.
    39. 

  39. Rosenzweig M.R. What is psychological science//International psychological science: Progress, problems, and prospects. Washington, 1992.
    40. 

  40. Sass L.A. The epic of disbelief: The postmodernist turn in contemporary psychoanalysis//Psychology and postmodernism. London, 1994. R. 166-182.
    41. 

  41. Sexton V.S., Hogan J. (Eds.) International psychology: Views from around the world (2nd ed.). Lincoln, 1992.
    42. 

  42. Shotter J. "Getting in touch": The Metha-methodology of a postmodern science of mental life//Psychology and postmodernism. London, 1994. R. 58-73.
    43. 

  43. Skinner B.F. Refl ections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1978.
    44. 

  44. TransMONEE Database. 2010. URL: http://www. transmonee.org
    45. 

  45. Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index 2010. URL: http://www.transparency.org/policy_ research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/in_detail#3
    46. 

  46. Van der Vleist R. Social psychological theory and empirical studies of practical problems//Confronting social issues: Applications of social psychology. L., 1982. V. l. R. 7-22.
    47.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate