Везде
THEORIES AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON JUSTICE IN THE FOREIGN PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THEORIES AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON JUSTICE IN THE FOREIGN PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
NADEZHDA ASTANINA  Sofya K. Nartova-Bochaver
ORCID: 0000-0002-8061-4154
Abstract
The review of research and theories in psychology of justice in foreign personality psychology is presented. Theories of belief in a just world and sensitivity to justice are analyzed. Methods and procedures of justice study in psychology are specified. Phenomenology of belief in a just world as a world-view attitude and justice sensitivity as a personal traitis described. Prospects for psychology of justice for different fields of applied psychology are outlined.
Keywords
psychology of personality, psychology of justice, belief in a just world, sensitivity to justice, prosocial attitudes, selfi sh attitudes, person’s resources.
Date of publication
03.01.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
609
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000616-4-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 25.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Gulevich O.A. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya spravedlivosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2011.
    2. 

  2. Dostoevskij F.M. Sobranie sochinenij: V 15 t. L.: Nauka, 1989. T. 5.
    3. 

  3. Mikhajlova M.M. Predstavleniya zaklyuchennykh i zakonoposlushnykh grazhdan o spravedlivosti i vera v spravedlivyj mir -sravnitel'nyj analiz//Yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. 2010. № 3. S. 7-12.
    4. 

  4. Sosnina L.M. Tendentsii issledovaniya spravedlivosti v zarubezhnoj sotsial'noj psikhologii//Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2006. T. 27. № 5. S. 40-49.
    5. 

  5. Shopengauehr A. Ob interesnom. M.: Olimp; AST, 1997.
    6. 

  6. Baumert A., Gollwitzer M., Staubach M., Schmitt M. Justice Sensitivity and the Processing of Justicerelated Information//European Journ. of Personality. 2011. V. 25. P. 386-397.
    7. 

  7. Be`gue L., Bastounis M. Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world//Journal of Personality. 2003. V. 71. P. 435-463.
    8. 

  8. Beierlein C., Baumert A., Schmitt M., Kemper Ch.J., Kovaleva A., Rammstedt B. Kurzskalen zur Messung der Ungerechtigkeitssensibilitaet: Die Ungerechtig-keitssensibilitaet-Skalen-8 (USS-8)//Leibniz-Institut fuer Sozialwissenschaften. Working papers. 2012. V. 21. URL: http://www.gesis.org/uploads/media/USS8_Workingpaper_02.pdf
    9. 

  9. Bierhoff H.-W., Klein R., Kramp P. Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research//Journal of Personality. 1991. V. 59. P. 264-280.
    10. 

  10. Braband J., Lerner M.J. “A little time and effort”.. Who deserves what from whom?//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1974. V. 1. P. 177-179.
    11. 

  11. Brosnan S.F., De Waal F.B.M. Monkeys Reject Unequal Pay//Nature. 2003. 25. P. 297-299.
    12. 

  12. Campbell D., Carr S.C., McLachlen E. Attributing ‘‘third world poverty'' in Australia and Malawi: A case of donor bias//Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2001. V. 31(2). P. 409-430.  
    13. 

  13. Costa P.T., Mc Crae R.R. NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Ressources, 1989.
    14. 

  14. Dalbert C. Gefaehrdung des Wohlbefindens durch Arbeitplatzunsicherheit: Eine Analyse des Einflussfaktoren Selbstwert und Grerechte-Welt-Glaube//Zeitschrift fuer Gesundheitpsychologie. 1993. V. 1. P. 235-253.
    15. 

  15. Dalbert C. Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds. L. Montada, M.J. Lerner. N.Y.: Plenum Press. 1998. P. 87-105.
    16. 

  16. Dalbert C. The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity//Social Justice Research. 1999. V. 12. P. 79-98.
    17. 

  17. Dalbert C. The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. N.Y.: Plenum Publishers, 2001.
    18. 

  18. Dalbert C., Katona-Sallay H. The belief in a just world in Hungary//Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1996. V. 27(3). P. 293-314.
    19. 

  19. Dalbert C., Montada L., Schmit M. Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen//Psychologische Beiträge. 1987. V. 29. P. 596-615.
    20. 

  20. Dalbert C. Beliefs in a just world as a buffer against anger//Social Justice Research. 2002. № 15. P. 123-145.
    21. 

  21. Dalbert C., Lipkus I., Sallay H., Goch I. A just and an unjust world: Structure and validity of different world belief//Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. V. 30. P. 561-577.
    22. 

  22. Dar Y., Resh N. Exploring the multifaceted structure of sense of deprivation//European Journ. of Social Psychology. 2001. V. 31. P. 63-81.
    23. 

  23. Deci E.L. Intrinsic motivation. N.Y.: Plenum Press. 1975.
    24. 

  24. Drout C.E., Gaertner S.L. Gender differences in reactions to female victims//Social Behavior and Personality. 1994. V. 22. P. 267-278.
    25. 

  25. Ebstein R.P. The molecular genetic architecture of human personality: beyond self-report questionnaires//Molecular Psychiatry. 2006. V. 11. P. 427-445.
    26. 

  26. Fetchenhauer D., Huang X. Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games//Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. V. 36. P. 1015-1029.
    27. 

  27. Furnham A., Gunter B. Just world beliefs and attitudes towards the poor//British Journ. of Social Psychology. 1984. V. 23. P. 265-269.
    28. 

  28. Gerlach T.M., Allemand M., Agroskin D., Denissen J.J. Justice Sensitivity and Forgiveness in Close Interpersonal Relationships: The Mediating Role of Mistrustful, Legitimizing, and Pro-Relationship Cognitions//Journal of. Personality. 2012. V. 80. No. 5. P. 1373-1413.
    29. 

  29. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1982.
    30. 

  30. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T. When the need to trust results in unethical behavior: The Sensitivity to mean intentions (SeMI) model//Psychological perspectives on unethical behavior and decision making/Ed. D. De Cremer. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 2009. P. 135-152.
    31. 

  31. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T. What Exactly Are Victim-Sensitive Persons Sensitive To?//Journ. of Research in Personality. 2011. V. 45(5). P. 448-455.
    32. 

  32. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T., Alt B., Jekel M. Victim Sensitivity and the Accuracy of Social Judgment//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012. № 38 (8). P. 975-984.
    33. 

  33. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T., Pfeiffer A., Ensenbach C. Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro-and antisocial behavior//Journal of Research in Personality. 2009. V. 43. P. 999-1005.
    34. 

  34. Gollwitzer M., Schmitt M., Schalke R., Maes J., Baer A. Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior//Social Justice Research. 2005. V. 18. P. 183-201.
    35. 

  35. Guzewicz T.D., Takooshian H. Development of a short-form scale of public attitudes toward homelessness//Journ. of Social Distress & the Homeless. 1992. V. 1(1). P. 67-79.
    36. 

  36. Hafer C.L., Bègue L. Experimental research on justworld theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges//Psychological Bulletin. 2005. V. 131. P. 128-167.
    37. 

  37. Harper D.J., Wagstaff G.F., Newton J.T., Harrison K.R. Lay causal perceptions of third world poverty and the just world theory//Social Behavior and Personality. 1990. V. 18 (2). P. 235-238.
    38. 

  38. Herbert T.B., Dunkel-Schetter C. Negative social reactions to victims: An overview of responses and their determinants//Life crises andexperiences of loss in adulthood/Eds.: L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp & M.J. Lerner. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1992. P. 497-518.
    39. 

  39. Iram F. Belief in a just world and subjective well-being in mothers of normal and Down syndrome children: PhD Dissertation. Lahore. 2009.
    40. 

  40. Jones W.H., Freemon J.E., Goswick R.A. The persistence of loneliness: Self and other determinant//Journ. of Personality. 1981. V. 49. P. 27-48.
    41. 

  41. Lench H.C., Chang E.S. Belief in an Unjust World: When Beliefs in a Just World Fail//Journ. of Personality assessment. 2007. V. 89 (2). P. 126-135.
    42. 

  42. Lerner M.J. The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms//Journ. of Personality. 1977. V. 45. P. 1-52.
    43. 

  43. Lerner M.J., Miller D.T. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead//Psychological Bulletin. 1978. V. 85. P. 1030-1051.
    44. 

  44. Kontekst:           ...TEORIYa VERY V SPRAVEDLIVYJ MIR Ponyatie “vera v spravedlivyj mir” (VSM) bylo vvedeno psikhologom Lernerom v 1960-e gody i opisano v ego odnoimennoj teorii [42-47]...
    45. 

  45. Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. N.Y.: Plenum. 1980.
    46. 

  46. Lerner M.J. The Justice Motive: Where Social Psychologists Found It, How they Lost It, and Why They May Not Find It Again//Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2003. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 388-399.
    47. 

  47. Lerner M.J., Simmons C.H. Observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966. V. 4. P. 203-210.
    48. 

  48. Lerner M.J., Miller D.T., Holmes J.G. Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice//Advances in experimental social psychology/Eds.: L. Berkowitz & E. Walster. N.Y.: Academic Press. 1976. V. 9. P. 133-162.
    49. 

  49. Leventhal G.S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships//Social exchange/Eds.: K.J. Gergen, M.S., Greenberg & R.H. Willis. N.Y.: Plenum. 1980. P. 27-55.
    50. 

  50. Lind A.E., Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice. N.Y.: Plenum, 1988.
    51. 

  51. Lipkus I. The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale//Personality and Individual Differences. 1991. V. 12. P. 1171-1178.
    52. 

  52. Lipkus I.M., Bissonnette V. The belief in a just world and willingness to accommodate among married and dating couples//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds.: L. Montada, & M.J. Lerner. N.Y.: Plenum Press. 1998. P. 127-140.
    53. 

  53. Lipkus I.M., Siegler I.C. The belief in a just world and perceptions of discrimination//Journal of Psychology. 1993. V. 127(4). P. 465-474.
    54. 

  54. Lipkus I., Bissonnette V.L. Relationships among belief in a just world, willingness to accommodate, and marital well-being//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996. V. 22(10). P. 1043-1056.
    55. 

  55. Lipkus I.M., Dalbert C., Siegler I.C. The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996. V. 22. P. 666-677.
    56. 

  56. Littrell J., Beck E. Perceiving oppression: Relation-ships with resilience, self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and reliance on God in African-American homeless men//Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 1999. V. 26 (4). P. 137-158.
    57. 

  57. Long G.T., Lerner M.J. Deserving, the “personal contract” and altruistic behavior by children//Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974. V. 29. P. 551-556.
    58. 

  58. Lotz S. The stability and fragility of fairness: How individual concerns for justice affect human perception, emotion, and behavior: PHD dissertation. Köln, 2010.
    59. 

  59. Lotz S., Baumert A., Fechtenhauer D., Gresser F., Schlösser T. Justice Sensitivity, Moral Emotions, and Altruistic Punishment//IACM 23rd Annual Conference Paper. SSRN. URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1612791
    60. 

  60. Luginbuhl J., Mullin C. Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed?//Sex Roles. 1981. V. 7. P. 547-559.
    61. 

  61. Maes J. Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds.: L. Montada, M. Lerner. N. Y.: Plenum, 1998. P. 9-40.
    62. 

  62. Major B., Deaux K. Individual differences in justice behavior//Equity and justice in social behavior/Eds.: J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen. NY: Academic Press, 1982. P. 43-76.
    63. 

  63. McLean M.J., Chown S.M. Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students//International Journ. of Aging and Human Development. 1988. V. 26 (4). P. 249-260.
    64. 

  64. Mikula G. On the experience of injustice//European Review of Social Psychology/Eds.: W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone. Chichester: Wiley, 1993. V. 4. P. 223-244.
    65. 

  65. Montada L., Lerner M.J. (Eds.). Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1998. P. 163-186.
    66. 

  66. Montada L. Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and selfinterest?//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds. L. Montada, & M. J. Lerner. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1998. P. 217-246.
    67. 

  67. Nartova-Bochaver S., Astanina N. Individual Differences in Russian Adults' Justice Sensitivity: 16th European Conference on Personality Psychology. July 10-14 2012. Trieste Italy. Book of abstracts. IS2-5. P. 24.
    68. 

  68. Oppenheimer L. The belief in a just world and subjective perceptions of society: A developmental perspective//Journal of Adolescence. 2006. Is. 4. V. 29. P. 655-669.
    69. 

  69. Otto K., Dalbert C. Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners//Journal of Resarch in Personality. 2005. V. 39. P. 559-573
    70. 

  70. Ritter C., Benson D.E., Snyder C. Belief in a just world and depression//Sociological Perspective. 1990. V. 235. P. 235-252.
    71. 

  71. Rubin Z., Peplau L.A. Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery//Journal of Social Issues. 1973. V. 29 (4). P. 73-93.
    72. 

  72. Rubin Z., Peplau L.A. Who believes in a just world?//Journal of Social Issues. 1975. V. 31(3). P. 65-89.
    73. 

  73. Sabbagh C., Dar Y., Resh N. The structure of social justice judgements: A facet approach//Social Psychology Quarterly. 1994. V. 57. P. 244-261.
    74. 

  74. Schmitt M. Abriß der Gerechtigkeitspsychologie (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 70). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I-Psychologie. 1993.
    75. 

  75. Schmitt M., Dörfel M. Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being//European Journal of Social Psychology. 1999. V. 29. P. 443-453.
    76. 

  76. Schmitt M., Baumert A., Fetchenhauer D., Gollwitzer M., Rothmund R. Schlösser T. Sensibilität für Ungerechtigkeit//Psychologische Rundschau. 2009. Nr. 60(1). S. 8-22.
    77. 

  77. Schmitt M., Baumert A., Gollwitzer M., Maes J. The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data//Social Justice Research. 2010. V. 23. P. 211-238.
    78. 

  78. Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Baumert A., Gschwendner T., Hofmann W., Rothmund T. Traits as Situational. Sensitivities: Psychometric and Substantive Comments on the TASS Model Proposed by Marshall and Brown, 2006.
    79. 

  79. Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Maes J., Arbach D. Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space//European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005. V. 21. P. 202-211.
    80. 

  80. Schmitt M., Mohiyeddini C. Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage//Social Justice Research. 1996. V. 9. P. 223-238.
    81. 

  81. Schmitt M., Montada L., Dalbert C. Struktur und Funktion der Verantwortlichkeitsabwehr//Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie. 1991. V. 11. S. 203-214.
    82. 

  82. Schmitt M., Neumann R., Montada L. Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice//Social Justice Research. 1995. V. 8. P. 385-407.
    83. 

  83. Schmitt M., Rebele J., Bennecke J., Förster N. Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität, Kündigungsgerechtigkeit und Verantwortlichkeitszuschreibungen als Korrelate von Einstellungen und Verhalten Gekündigter gegenüber ihrem früheren Arbeitgeber (Post Citizenship Behavior) [Justice sensitivity, layoff fairness, and responsibility attributions as correlates of post citizenship behavior of laid off employees]//Wirtschaftspsychologie. 2008. Nr. 10. S. 101-110.
    84. 

  84. Staubach M. Visual Attentional Bias toward Injustice: Cause or Consequence of Justice Sensitivity? An Approach Employing the Dot Probe Task//Diplomarbeit aus dem Fachbereich Psychologie. Universität Koblenz-Landau, Campus Landau, 2010.
    85. 

  85. Strelan P., Sutton R.M. When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness//Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. V. 50. P. 163-168.
    86. 

  86. Sutton R.M., Calogero R.M., Bardi A. A certain kind of just-world belief: the epistemic purpose of believing life treats other people fairly: 16th European Conference on Personality Psychology, July 10-14 2012, Trieste Italy. Book of abstracts. IS2-1. P. 22.
    87. 

  87. Sutton R.M., Douglas K.M., Wilkin K., Elder T.J., Cole J.M., Stathi S. Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008. V. 38. P. 528-541.
    88. 

  88. Sutton R.M.,Winnard E.J. Looking ahead through lenses of justice: The relevance of just-world beliefs to intentions and confidence in the future//British Journal of Social Psychology. 2007. V. 46. P. 649-666.
    89. 

  89. Sutton R., Douglas K. Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the selfother distinction in just-world beliefs//Personality and Individual Differences. 2005. V. 39. V. 637-645.
    90. 

  90. Thomas N., Baumert A., Schmitt M. Justice Sensitivity as a Risk and Protective Factor in Social Conflicts//Justice and Conflicts. 2012. P. 107-120.
    91. 

  91. Van den Bos K., Maas M., Waldring I., Semin G.P. Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity//Social Justice Research. 2003. V. 6. P. 151-168.
    92. 

  92. Van Hiel A., De Cremer D., Stouten J. The personality basis of justice: The Five-Factor Model as an integrative model of personality and procedural fairness effects on cooperation//European Journal of Personality. 2008. V. 22. P. 519-539.
    93. 

  93. Wagstaff G.F. Correlates of the just world in Britain//The Journal of Social Psychology. 1983. V. 121. P. 145-146.
    94. 

  94. Walke I., Smith H. Relative deprivation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    95. 

  95. Walster E., Walster G.W.,Berscheid E. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
    96. 

  96. Weigel R.H., Howes P.W. Conceptions of racial prejudice//Journal of Social Issues. 1985. V. 41(3). P. 117-138.
    97. 

  97. Wijn R.,van den Bos K. Toward a better understanding of the justice judgement process: The influence of previous just and unjust events on Justice Sensitivity//European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009. V. 40. P. 1294-1301.
    98. 

  98. Wu M.S., Schmitt M., Nartova-Bochaver S., Astanina N., Khachatryan N., Zhou Ch., Han B. Does It Bother Me to Profit from Others: Cross-Cultural Surveys on Beneficiary Sensitivity and Individuality Orientation//16th European Conference on Personality Psychology, July 10-14 2012, Trieste Italy. Book of abstracts. IS2-6. P. 24.
    99. 

  99.         Wu M.S., Yan X., Zhou CH., Chen Y., Li J., Zhu Z., Shen X., Han B. General Belief in a Just World and Resilience: Evidence from a Collectivistic Culture//European Journal of Personality. 2011. V. 25. P. 431-442.
    100.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate