Везде
ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ СПРАВЕДЛИВОСТИ В ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ПЕРСОНОЛОГИИ: ТЕОРИИ И ЭМПИРИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
Оглавление
Аннотация Оценить Содержание публикации
Библиография Комментарии
Поделиться
QR
Метрика
ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ СПРАВЕДЛИВОСТИ В ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ПЕРСОНОЛОГИИ: ТЕОРИИ И ЭМПИРИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0205-95920000616-4-
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
АСТАНИНА НАДЕЖДА БОРИСОВНА  Нартова-Бочавер Софья Кимовна
ORCID: 0000-0002-8061-4154
Аннотация
Представлен обзор исследований и теорий психологии справедливости в зарубежной персонологии. Проанализированы теории веры в справедливый мир и чувствительности к справедливости. Перечислены методы и приемы исследования психологии справедливости. Описана феноменология веры в справедливый мир - мировоззренческой установки и чувствительности к справедливости как черты личности. Очерчены перспективы психологии справедливости для разных областей прикладной психологии.
Ключевые слова
психология личности, психология справедливости, вера в справедливый мир, чувствительность к справедливости, просоциальные установки, эгоистичные установки, ресурсы личности.
Классификатор
Дата публикации
03.01.2014
Всего подписок
1
Всего просмотров
608
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Другие версии
S0205-95920000616-4-1 Дата внесения исправлений в статью - 25.10.2020
Цитировать Скачать pdf

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

    

  1. Гулевич О.А. Социальная психология справедливости. М.: Изд-во “Институт психологии РАН”, 2011.
    2. 

  2. Достоевский Ф.М. Собрание сочинений: В 15 т. Л.: Наука, 1989. Т. 5.
    3. 

  3. Михайлова М.М. Представления заключенных и законопослушных граждан о справедливости и вера в справедливый мир -сравнительный анализ//Юридическая психология. 2010. № 3. С. 7-12.
    4. 

  4. Соснина Л.М. Тенденции исследования справедливости в зарубежной социальной психологии//Психологический журнал. 2006. Т. 27. № 5. С. 40-49.
    5. 

  5. Шопенгауэр А. Об интересном. М.: Олимп; АСТ, 1997.
    6. 

  6. Baumert A., Gollwitzer M., Staubach M., Schmitt M. Justice Sensitivity and the Processing of Justicerelated Information//European Journ. of Personality. 2011. V. 25. P. 386-397.
    7. 

  7. Be`gue L., Bastounis M. Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world//Journal of Personality. 2003. V. 71. P. 435-463.
    8. 

  8. Beierlein C., Baumert A., Schmitt M., Kemper Ch.J., Kovaleva A., Rammstedt B. Kurzskalen zur Messung der Ungerechtigkeitssensibilitaet: Die Ungerechtig-keitssensibilitaet-Skalen-8 (USS-8)//Leibniz-Institut fuer Sozialwissenschaften. Working papers. 2012. V. 21. URL: http://www.gesis.org/uploads/media/USS8_Workingpaper_02.pdf
    9. 

  9. Bierhoff H.-W., Klein R., Kramp P. Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research//Journal of Personality. 1991. V. 59. P. 264-280.
    10. 

  10. Braband J., Lerner M.J. “A little time and effort”.. Who deserves what from whom?//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1974. V. 1. P. 177-179.
    11. 

  11. Brosnan S.F., De Waal F.B.M. Monkeys Reject Unequal Pay//Nature. 2003. 25. P. 297-299.
    12. 

  12. Campbell D., Carr S.C., McLachlen E. Attributing ‘‘third world poverty'' in Australia and Malawi: A case of donor bias//Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2001. V. 31(2). P. 409-430.  
    13. 

  13. Costa P.T., Mc Crae R.R. NEO PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Ressources, 1989.
    14. 

  14. Dalbert C. Gefaehrdung des Wohlbefindens durch Arbeitplatzunsicherheit: Eine Analyse des Einflussfaktoren Selbstwert und Grerechte-Welt-Glaube//Zeitschrift fuer Gesundheitpsychologie. 1993. V. 1. P. 235-253.
    15. 

  15. Dalbert C. Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds. L. Montada, M.J. Lerner. N.Y.: Plenum Press. 1998. P. 87-105.
    16. 

  16. Dalbert C. The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity//Social Justice Research. 1999. V. 12. P. 79-98.
    17. 

  17. Dalbert C. The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. N.Y.: Plenum Publishers, 2001.
    18. 

  18. Dalbert C., Katona-Sallay H. The belief in a just world in Hungary//Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1996. V. 27(3). P. 293-314.
    19. 

  19. Dalbert C., Montada L., Schmit M. Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen//Psychologische Beiträge. 1987. V. 29. P. 596-615.
    20. 

  20. Dalbert C. Beliefs in a just world as a buffer against anger//Social Justice Research. 2002. № 15. P. 123-145.
    21. 

  21. Dalbert C., Lipkus I., Sallay H., Goch I. A just and an unjust world: Structure and validity of different world belief//Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. V. 30. P. 561-577.
    22. 

  22. Dar Y., Resh N. Exploring the multifaceted structure of sense of deprivation//European Journ. of Social Psychology. 2001. V. 31. P. 63-81.
    23. 

  23. Deci E.L. Intrinsic motivation. N.Y.: Plenum Press. 1975.
    24. 

  24. Drout C.E., Gaertner S.L. Gender differences in reactions to female victims//Social Behavior and Personality. 1994. V. 22. P. 267-278.
    25. 

  25. Ebstein R.P. The molecular genetic architecture of human personality: beyond self-report questionnaires//Molecular Psychiatry. 2006. V. 11. P. 427-445.
    26. 

  26. Fetchenhauer D., Huang X. Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games//Personality and Individual Differences. 2004. V. 36. P. 1015-1029.
    27. 

  27. Furnham A., Gunter B. Just world beliefs and attitudes towards the poor//British Journ. of Social Psychology. 1984. V. 23. P. 265-269.
    28. 

  28. Gerlach T.M., Allemand M., Agroskin D., Denissen J.J. Justice Sensitivity and Forgiveness in Close Interpersonal Relationships: The Mediating Role of Mistrustful, Legitimizing, and Pro-Relationship Cognitions//Journal of. Personality. 2012. V. 80. No. 5. P. 1373-1413.
    29. 

  29. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1982.
    30. 

  30. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T. When the need to trust results in unethical behavior: The Sensitivity to mean intentions (SeMI) model//Psychological perspectives on unethical behavior and decision making/Ed. D. De Cremer. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 2009. P. 135-152.
    31. 

  31. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T. What Exactly Are Victim-Sensitive Persons Sensitive To?//Journ. of Research in Personality. 2011. V. 45(5). P. 448-455.
    32. 

  32. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T., Alt B., Jekel M. Victim Sensitivity and the Accuracy of Social Judgment//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012. № 38 (8). P. 975-984.
    33. 

  33. Gollwitzer M., Rothmund T., Pfeiffer A., Ensenbach C. Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro-and antisocial behavior//Journal of Research in Personality. 2009. V. 43. P. 999-1005.
    34. 

  34. Gollwitzer M., Schmitt M., Schalke R., Maes J., Baer A. Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior//Social Justice Research. 2005. V. 18. P. 183-201.
    35. 

  35. Guzewicz T.D., Takooshian H. Development of a short-form scale of public attitudes toward homelessness//Journ. of Social Distress & the Homeless. 1992. V. 1(1). P. 67-79.
    36. 

  36. Hafer C.L., Bègue L. Experimental research on justworld theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges//Psychological Bulletin. 2005. V. 131. P. 128-167.
    37. 

  37. Harper D.J., Wagstaff G.F., Newton J.T., Harrison K.R. Lay causal perceptions of third world poverty and the just world theory//Social Behavior and Personality. 1990. V. 18 (2). P. 235-238.
    38. 

  38. Herbert T.B., Dunkel-Schetter C. Negative social reactions to victims: An overview of responses and their determinants//Life crises andexperiences of loss in adulthood/Eds.: L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp & M.J. Lerner. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1992. P. 497-518.
    39. 

  39. Iram F. Belief in a just world and subjective well-being in mothers of normal and Down syndrome children: PhD Dissertation. Lahore. 2009.
    40. 

  40. Jones W.H., Freemon J.E., Goswick R.A. The persistence of loneliness: Self and other determinant//Journ. of Personality. 1981. V. 49. P. 27-48.
    41. 

  41. Lench H.C., Chang E.S. Belief in an Unjust World: When Beliefs in a Just World Fail//Journ. of Personality assessment. 2007. V. 89 (2). P. 126-135.
    42. 

  42. Lerner M.J. The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms//Journ. of Personality. 1977. V. 45. P. 1-52.
    43. 

  43. Lerner M.J., Miller D.T. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead//Psychological Bulletin. 1978. V. 85. P. 1030-1051.
    44. 



Контекст:           ...ТЕОРИЯ ВЕРЫ В СПРАВЕДЛИВЫЙ МИР Понятие “вера в справедливый мир” (ВСМ) было введено психологом Лернером в 1960-е годы и описано в его одноименной теории [42-47]...


    

  1. Lerner M.J. The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. N.Y.: Plenum. 1980.
    2. 

  2. Lerner M.J. The Justice Motive: Where Social Psychologists Found It, How they Lost It, and Why They May Not Find It Again//Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2003. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 388-399.
    3. 

  3. Lerner M.J., Simmons C.H. Observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection?//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966. V. 4. P. 203-210.
    4. 

  4. Lerner M.J., Miller D.T., Holmes J.G. Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice//Advances in experimental social psychology/Eds.: L. Berkowitz & E. Walster. N.Y.: Academic Press. 1976. V. 9. P. 133-162.
    5. 

  5. Leventhal G.S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships//Social exchange/Eds.: K.J. Gergen, M.S., Greenberg & R.H. Willis. N.Y.: Plenum. 1980. P. 27-55.
    6. 

  6. Lind A.E., Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice. N.Y.: Plenum, 1988.
    7. 

  7. Lipkus I. The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale//Personality and Individual Differences. 1991. V. 12. P. 1171-1178.
    8. 

  8. Lipkus I.M., Bissonnette V. The belief in a just world and willingness to accommodate among married and dating couples//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds.: L. Montada, & M.J. Lerner. N.Y.: Plenum Press. 1998. P. 127-140.
    9. 

  9. Lipkus I.M., Siegler I.C. The belief in a just world and perceptions of discrimination//Journal of Psychology. 1993. V. 127(4). P. 465-474.
    10. 

  10. Lipkus I., Bissonnette V.L. Relationships among belief in a just world, willingness to accommodate, and marital well-being//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996. V. 22(10). P. 1043-1056.
    11. 

  11. Lipkus I.M., Dalbert C., Siegler I.C. The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996. V. 22. P. 666-677.
    12. 

  12. Littrell J., Beck E. Perceiving oppression: Relation-ships with resilience, self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and reliance on God in African-American homeless men//Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 1999. V. 26 (4). P. 137-158.
    13. 

  13. Long G.T., Lerner M.J. Deserving, the “personal contract” and altruistic behavior by children//Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974. V. 29. P. 551-556.
    14. 

  14. Lotz S. The stability and fragility of fairness: How individual concerns for justice affect human perception, emotion, and behavior: PHD dissertation. Köln, 2010.
    15. 

  15. Lotz S., Baumert A., Fechtenhauer D., Gresser F., Schlösser T. Justice Sensitivity, Moral Emotions, and Altruistic Punishment//IACM 23rd Annual Conference Paper. SSRN. URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1612791
    16. 

  16. Luginbuhl J., Mullin C. Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed?//Sex Roles. 1981. V. 7. P. 547-559.
    17. 

  17. Maes J. Immanent justice and ultimate justice: Two ways of believing in justice//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds.: L. Montada, M. Lerner. N. Y.: Plenum, 1998. P. 9-40.
    18. 

  18. Major B., Deaux K. Individual differences in justice behavior//Equity and justice in social behavior/Eds.: J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen. NY: Academic Press, 1982. P. 43-76.
    19. 

  19. McLean M.J., Chown S.M. Just world beliefs and attitudes toward helping elderly people: A comparison of British and Canadian university students//International Journ. of Aging and Human Development. 1988. V. 26 (4). P. 249-260.
    20. 

  20. Mikula G. On the experience of injustice//European Review of Social Psychology/Eds.: W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone. Chichester: Wiley, 1993. V. 4. P. 223-244.
    21. 

  21. Montada L., Lerner M.J. (Eds.). Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1998. P. 163-186.
    22. 

  22. Montada L. Belief in a just world: A hybrid of justice motive and selfinterest?//Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world/Eds. L. Montada, & M. J. Lerner. N.Y.: Plenum Press, 1998. P. 217-246.
    23. 

  23. Nartova-Bochaver S., Astanina N. Individual Differences in Russian Adults' Justice Sensitivity: 16th European Conference on Personality Psychology. July 10-14 2012. Trieste Italy. Book of abstracts. IS2-5. P. 24.
    24. 

  24. Oppenheimer L. The belief in a just world and subjective perceptions of society: A developmental perspective//Journal of Adolescence. 2006. Is. 4. V. 29. P. 655-669.
    25. 

  25. Otto K., Dalbert C. Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners//Journal of Resarch in Personality. 2005. V. 39. P. 559-573
    26. 

  26. Ritter C., Benson D.E., Snyder C. Belief in a just world and depression//Sociological Perspective. 1990. V. 235. P. 235-252.
    27. 

  27. Rubin Z., Peplau L.A. Belief in a just world and reactions to another's lot: A study of participants in the national draft lottery//Journal of Social Issues. 1973. V. 29 (4). P. 73-93.
    28. 

  28. Rubin Z., Peplau L.A. Who believes in a just world?//Journal of Social Issues. 1975. V. 31(3). P. 65-89.
    29. 

  29. Sabbagh C., Dar Y., Resh N. The structure of social justice judgements: A facet approach//Social Psychology Quarterly. 1994. V. 57. P. 244-261.
    30. 

  30. Schmitt M. Abriß der Gerechtigkeitspsychologie (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 70). Trier: Universität Trier, Fachbereich I-Psychologie. 1993.
    31. 

  31. Schmitt M., Dörfel M. Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being//European Journal of Social Psychology. 1999. V. 29. P. 443-453.
    32. 

  32. Schmitt M., Baumert A., Fetchenhauer D., Gollwitzer M., Rothmund R. Schlösser T. Sensibilität für Ungerechtigkeit//Psychologische Rundschau. 2009. Nr. 60(1). S. 8-22.
    33. 

  33. Schmitt M., Baumert A., Gollwitzer M., Maes J. The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data//Social Justice Research. 2010. V. 23. P. 211-238.
    34. 

  34. Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Baumert A., Gschwendner T., Hofmann W., Rothmund T. Traits as Situational. Sensitivities: Psychometric and Substantive Comments on the TASS Model Proposed by Marshall and Brown, 2006.
    35. 

  35. Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Maes J., Arbach D. Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space//European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2005. V. 21. P. 202-211.
    36. 

  36. Schmitt M., Mohiyeddini C. Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage//Social Justice Research. 1996. V. 9. P. 223-238.
    37. 

  37. Schmitt M., Montada L., Dalbert C. Struktur und Funktion der Verantwortlichkeitsabwehr//Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie. 1991. V. 11. S. 203-214.
    38. 

  38. Schmitt M., Neumann R., Montada L. Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice//Social Justice Research. 1995. V. 8. P. 385-407.
    39. 

  39. Schmitt M., Rebele J., Bennecke J., Förster N. Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität, Kündigungsgerechtigkeit und Verantwortlichkeitszuschreibungen als Korrelate von Einstellungen und Verhalten Gekündigter gegenüber ihrem früheren Arbeitgeber (Post Citizenship Behavior) [Justice sensitivity, layoff fairness, and responsibility attributions as correlates of post citizenship behavior of laid off employees]//Wirtschaftspsychologie. 2008. Nr. 10. S. 101-110.
    40. 

  40. Staubach M. Visual Attentional Bias toward Injustice: Cause or Consequence of Justice Sensitivity? An Approach Employing the Dot Probe Task//Diplomarbeit aus dem Fachbereich Psychologie. Universität Koblenz-Landau, Campus Landau, 2010.
    41. 

  41. Strelan P., Sutton R.M. When just-world beliefs promote and when they inhibit forgiveness//Personality and Individual Differences. 2011. V. 50. P. 163-168.
    42. 

  42. Sutton R.M., Calogero R.M., Bardi A. A certain kind of just-world belief: the epistemic purpose of believing life treats other people fairly: 16th European Conference on Personality Psychology, July 10-14 2012, Trieste Italy. Book of abstracts. IS2-1. P. 22.
    43. 

  43. Sutton R.M., Douglas K.M., Wilkin K., Elder T.J., Cole J.M., Stathi S. Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008. V. 38. P. 528-541.
    44. 

  44. Sutton R.M.,Winnard E.J. Looking ahead through lenses of justice: The relevance of just-world beliefs to intentions and confidence in the future//British Journal of Social Psychology. 2007. V. 46. P. 649-666.
    45. 

  45. Sutton R., Douglas K. Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the selfоther distinction in just-world beliefs//Personality and Individual Differences. 2005. V. 39. V. 637-645.
    46. 

  46. Thomas N., Baumert A., Schmitt M. Justice Sensitivity as a Risk and Protective Factor in Social Conflicts//Justice and Conflicts. 2012. P. 107-120.
    47. 

  47. Van den Bos K., Maas M., Waldring I., Semin G.P. Toward understanding the psychology of reactions to perceived fairness: The role of affect intensity//Social Justice Research. 2003. V. 6. P. 151-168.
    48. 

  48. Van Hiel A., De Cremer D., Stouten J. The personality basis of justice: The Five-Factor Model as an integrative model of personality and procedural fairness effects on cooperation//European Journal of Personality. 2008. V. 22. P. 519-539.
    49. 

  49. Wagstaff G.F. Correlates of the just world in Britain//The Journal of Social Psychology. 1983. V. 121. P. 145-146.
    50. 

  50. Walke I., Smith H. Relative deprivation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    51. 

  51. Walster E., Walster G.W.,Berscheid E. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
    52. 

  52. Weigel R.H., Howes P.W. Conceptions of racial prejudice//Journal of Social Issues. 1985. V. 41(3). P. 117-138.
    53. 

  53. Wijn R.,van den Bos K. Toward a better understanding of the justice judgement process: The influence of previous just and unjust events on Justice Sensitivity//European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009. V. 40. P. 1294-1301.
    54. 

  54. Wu M.S., Schmitt M., Nartova-Bochaver S., Astanina N., Khachatryan N., Zhou Ch., Han B. Does It Bother Me to Profit from Others: Cross-Cultural Surveys on Beneficiary Sensitivity and Individuality Orientation//16th European Conference on Personality Psychology, July 10-14 2012, Trieste Italy. Book of abstracts. IS2-6. P. 24.
    55. 


98.         Wu M.S., Yan X., Zhou CH., Chen Y., Li J., Zhu Z., Shen X., Han B. General Belief in a Just World and Resilience: Evidence from a Collectivistic Culture//European Journal of Personality. 2011. V. 25. P. 431-442.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести