Везде
EMPIRICAL JUSTIFICATION OF GROUP COHESION MODEL
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
EMPIRICAL JUSTIFICATION OF GROUP COHESION MODEL
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. MONDRUS  A. Sidorenkov
Abstract
Empirical data justifying theoretical statements of the authors model of group cohesion is presented. The hypothesis that two types of cohesion - object - action and socio-psychological, each including two forming grounds - organizational /group interests and individual interests, positive interrelations and personal benefi ts, can be revealed in small group and in informal subgroups is verifi ed on the sample of 22 industrial groups of different fi elds of activity (n = 280). Moderate positive correlation between types and negative correlation between forming grounds of cohesion was found and it is signifi cantly lower in informal subgroups than in group in tote. Types of group cohesion are conditioned by relations between informal subgroups, representatives of subgroups and off-duty members.
Keywords
Small group, informal group, socio-psychological cohesion, forming grounds of cohesion, object - action cohesion
Date of publication
03.03.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
724
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Behron R., Birn D., Dzhonson B. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya: klyuchevye idei. SPb.: Piter, 2003.
    2. 

  2. Behron R., Kerr N., Miller N. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya gruppy: protsessy, resheniya, dejstviya. SPb.: Piter, 2003.
    3. 

  3. Gorbatenko A.S. Metodika opredeleniya struktury maloj gruppy s pomosch'yu formalizovannogo analiza mezhlichnostnykh vyborov//Vopr. psikhol., 1984. № 4. S. 112-118.
    4. 

  4. Dontsov A.I. Problemy gruppovoj splochennosti. M.: MGU, 1979.
    5. 

  5. Krichevskij R.L., Dubovskaya E.M. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya maloj gruppy. M.: Aspekt Press, 2001.
    6. 

  6. Petrovskij A.V., Shpalinskij V.V. Gruppovaya splochennost' kak tsennostno-orientatsionnoe edinstvo//Psikhologicheskaya teoriya kollektiva/Pod red. A.V. Petrovskogo. M.: Pedagogika, 1979. S. 43-64.
    7. 

  7. Sidorenkov A.V. Gruppovaya splochennost' i neformal'nye podgruppy//Psikhol. zhurn. 2006. T. 27. № 1. S. 44-53.
    8. 

  8. Sidorenkov A.V. Komp'yuterizirovannaya sistema "Kompleksnaya sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika gruppy" (KSPDG-1.2). Svidetel'stvo ob ofitsial'noj registratsii programmy dlya EhVM № 2007611931 Federal'noj sluzhby po intellektual'noj sobstvennosti, patentam i tovarnym znakam. Moskva, 2007.
    9. 

  9. Sidorenkov A.V. Malaya gruppa i neformal'nye podgruppy: mikrogruppovaya teoriya. R-n/D: Izd-vo YuFU, 2010.
    10. 

  10. Sidorenkov A.V., Mondrus A.L. Podkhody k ponimaniyu splochennosti maloj gruppy//Severo-Kavkazskij psikhologicheskij vestnik. 2007. №5/1. S. 45-53.
    11. 

  11. Bollen K.A., Hoyle R.H. Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination//Social Forces. 1990. 69. № 2. R. 479-504.
    12. 

  12. Carless S.A., Paola C. The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams//Small Group Research. 2000. 31. № 1. P. 71-88.
    13. 

  13. Carron A.V. Group dynamics in sport. London, Ontario: Spodym. 1988.
    14. 

  14. Carron A.V., Brawley L.R. Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues//Small Group Research. 2000. 31. № 1. P. 89-106.
    15. 

  15. Cota A.A., Evans C.R., Dion K.L., Kilik L., Longman R.S. The structure of group cohesion//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995. 21. R. 572-580.
    16. 

  16. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes//Human Relations. 1954. 7. P. 117-140.
    17. 

  17. Frey L.R., Sunwolf. The Symbolic-interpretive perspective on group dynamics//Small group research. 2004. 35. № 3. P. 277-306.
    18. 

  18. Hogg M.A., Abrams D., Otten S., Hincle S. The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, selfconception, and small groups//Small group research. 2004. 35. № 3. P. 246-276.
    19. 

  19. Langfred C.W. Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness of performance//Small Group Research. 1998. 29. R. 124-143.
    20. 

  20. Lott A.J., Lott B.E. Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction//Psychological Bulletin. 1965. 64. R. 259-309.
    21. 

  21. Mudrack P. Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look//Human Relations. 1989. 42. R. 771-785.
    22. 

  22. Tajfel H., Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroupe confl ict//The Social psychology of intergroup relations/Eds. W. Austin, S. Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. P. 33-47.
    23. 

  23. Tajfel H., Turner J. The social identity theory of intergroupe behaviour//Psychology of intergroupe relations/Eds. S. Worchel, W. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986. P. 7-24.
    24. 

  24. Turner J., Hogg M., Oakes P., Reicher S., Wetherell M. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.
    25. 

  25. Wech B.A., Mossholder K.W., Steel R.P., Bennett N. Does work group cohesiveness affect individuals' performance and organizational commitment? A crosslevel examination//Small Group Research. 1998. 29. R. 472-494.
    26. 

  26. Widmeyer W.N., Brawley L.R., Carron A.V. Measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Canada: Spodym Publishers, 1985.
    27. 

  27. Zaccaro S., Lowe C. Cohesiveness and performance: Evidence for multidimensionality//Journ. of Social Psychology. 1988. 128. R. 547-558.
    28.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate