ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AS A FACTOR OF JUSTICE PERCEPTION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AS A FACTOR OF JUSTICE PERCEPTION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
Phenomenon of interactional justice as determinative condition of organization activity effi ciency is considered. It is shown that evaluating the justice of organizational decisions employees are guided by the set of social norms connected with the process and the result of communication. The type of organization and its organizational culture determines signifi cance of these norms. Conducted empirical research makes it possible to reveal that employees in organizations with support culture attach greater importance to interpersonal justice than employees in organizations with role culture.
Keywords
Justice of organizational decisions, organizational culture, organizational identifi cation
Date of publication
03.03.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
586
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Gulevich O.A., Spiridonov V.F., Bezmenova I.K. Kak izmerit' spravedlivost' v organizatsii: metodika Dzh. Kolkitta // Psikhodiagnostika. 2009. № 4. S. 67-79.
  2. Gulevich O.A., Spiridonov V.F., Bezmenova I.K., Umerenkova O. Otsenka spravedlivosti upravlencheskikh reshenij kak faktor organizatsionnoj identifikatsii // Voprosy psikhologii. 2011. № 2. S. 121-128.
  3. Kashnikov B.N. Liberal'nye teorii spravedlivosti i politicheskaya praktika Rossii. Velikij Novgorod: NovGU imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo, 2004.
  4. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Kul'tura kak faktor obschestvennogo progressa. M.: GU VShEh, 2009.
  5. Makdonal'd A.I. Kross-kul'turnye skhodstva i razlichiya v predstavleniyakh studentov o distributivnoj i retributivnoj spravedlivosti (na primere Rossii, Meksiki i Yamajki): Avtoref. diss. k. psikhol. n. Kazan', 2011.
  6. Spiridonov V.F., Gulevich O.A., Bezmenova I.K. Faktory, oposreduyuschie vospriyatie spravedlivosti organizatsionnogo vzaimodejstviya // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2010. № 1. S. 130-137.
  7. Ambrose M.L., Schminke M. Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2003. Vol. 88. P. 295-305.
  8. Ambrose M.L., Schminke M. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2009. Vol. 94. P. 491-500.
  9. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediated variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986. Vol. 51. P. 1173-1182.
  10. Ben-Ari R., Tsur Y., Har-Even D. Procedural justice, stress appraisal, and athletes' attitudes // International Journal of Stress Management. 2006. Vol. 13. P. 23- 44.
  11. Besley J.C., McComas K.A. Framing justice: using the concept of procedural justice to advance political communication research // Communication Theory. 2005. P. 414-436.
  12. Bies R.J. The predicament of injustice: the management of moral outrage // Research in organizational behavior / Eds. L.L. Cummings, B.M. Shaw. L., 1987. Vol. 9. P. 289-319.
  13. Bies R.J., Moag J. F. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness // Research on negotiations in organizations / Eds. R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, M.H. Bazerman. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1986. Vol. 1. P. 43-55.
  14. Brockner J., Ackerman G., Greenberg J., Gelfand M.J., Francesco A.M., Chen Z.X., Leung K., Bierbrauer G., Gomez C., Kirkman B.L., Shapiro D. Culture and procedural justice: the infl uence of power distance on reaction to voice // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2001. Vol. 37. P. 300-315.
  15. Carson A.S., Banuazizi A. "That's Not Fair". Similarities and differences in distributive justice reasoning between American and Filipino children // Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2008. Vol. 39. P. 493-514.
  16. Chiu C.-Y. Role expectation as the principal criterion in justice judgment among Hong Kong Chinese students // The Journ. of Psychology. 1991. Vol. 125. P. 557-565.
  17. Clayton S., Opotow S. Justice and identity: changing perspectives on what is fair // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2003. Vol. 7. P. 298-310.
  18. Colquitt J.A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. P. 386-400.
  19. Colquitt J.A., Conlon D.E., Wesson M.J., Porter C.O.L.H., Ng K.Y. Justice at the Millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. P. 425- 445.
  20. Cropanzano R., Slaughter J.E., Bachiochi P.D. Organizational justice and Black applicants' reactions to affi rmative action // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2005. Vol. 90 P. 1168-1184.
  21. De Cremer D., Blader S.L. Why do people care about procedural fairness? The importance of belongingness in responding and attending to procedures // European Journ. of Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 36. P. 211- 228.
  22. De Cremer D., van Knippenberg D., van Dijke M., Bos A.E.R. How self-relevant is fair treatment? Social self-esteem moderates interactional justice effects // Social Justice Research. 2004. Vol. 17. P. 407-419.
  23. Fischer R., Smith P.B. Reward allocation and culture. A meta-analysis // Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2003. Vol. 34. P. 251-268.
  24. Fuller Jr. J.B., Hester K. A closer look at the relationship between justice perceptions and union participation // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. P. 1096-1105.
  25. Handy C.B. Understanding organizations. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985.
  26. Harrison M.I. Diagnosing organizations: methods, models, and processes. Hewbury Park: Sage, 1987.
  27. Lambert E. The impact of organizational justice on correctional staff // Journ. of Criminal Justice. 2003. Vol. 31. P. 155-168.
  28. Leventhal G.S. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology / Ed. L. Berkowitz, T. Walster. NY., 1976. Vol. 9. P. 43-56.
  29. Lind E.A., Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice. N.Y., 1988.
  30. Lipponen J., Olkkonen M.-E., Myyry L. Personal value orientation as a moderator in the relationships between perceived organizational justice and its hypothesized consequences // Social Justice Research. 2004. Vol. 17. P. 275-292.
  31. Loi R., Hang-yue N., Foley S. Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: the mediating role of perceived organizational support // Journ. of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2006. Vol. 79. P. 101-120
  32. Mael F., Ashforth B.E. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identifi cation // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 1992. Vol. 13. P. 103-123.
  33. Masterson S.S. A trickle-down model of organizational justice: relating employees' and customers' perceptions of and reactions to fairness // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. P. 594-604.
  34. Murphy-Berman V., Berman J.J. Cross-cultural differences in perceptions of distributive justice. A comparison of Hong Kong and Indonesia // Journ. of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2002. Vol. 33. P. 157- 170.
  35. Murphy-Berman V.A., Berman J.J. Perceptions of justice and attitudes towards people with AIDS: German-U.S. comparisons // Social Behavior and Personality. 1991. Vol. 79. P. 29-38.
  36. Phillips J.M., Douthitt E.A., Hyland M.A.M. The role of justice in team member satisfaction with the leader and attachment to the team // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. P. 316- 325.
  37. Rhoades L., Eisenberger R., Armeli S. Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. Vol. 86. P. 825-836.
  38. Sabbagh C., Golden D. Refl ecting upon etic and emic perspectives on distributive justice // Social Justice Research. 2007. Vol. 20. P. 372-387.
  39. Scott B.A., Colquitt J.A., Paddock E.L. An actorfocused model of justice rule adherence and violation: the role of managerial motives and discretion // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2009. Vol. 94. P. 756-769.
  40. Shapiro D. L., Buttner E. H., Barry B. Explanations: what factors enhance their perceived adequacy? // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1994. Vol. 58. P. 346-368.
  41. Streicher B., Jonas E., Maier G.W., Frey D., Woscher R., Warmer B. Test of the construct and criteria validity of a German measure of organizational justice // European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2007. Vol. 24. P. 131-139.
  42. Thibaut O., Walker L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NL: Erlbaum, 1975.
  43. Tyler T.R. Procedural justice, identity and deference to the law: what shapes rule-following in a period of transition? // Australian Journal of Psychology. 2009. Vol. 61. P. 32-39.
  44. Tyler T.R. Using procedures to justify outcomes: testing the viability of a procedural justice strategy for managing confl ict and allocating resources in work organizations // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1991. Vol. 12. P. 259-279.
  45. Yang J., Mossholder K.W., Peng T.K. Procedural justice climate and group power distance: an examination of cross-level interaction effects // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2007. Vol. 92. P. 681-692.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate