Везде
CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY: PROBLEMS AND TENDENCIES OF DEVELOPMENT
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY: PROBLEMS AND TENDENCIES OF DEVELOPMENT
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Tatiana Emelyanova 
Abstract
The history of cross-cultural psychology and its main directions during 1960-1990 years are analyzed. The results of international research with author’s participation devoted to self-revelation in communication based on studying of M. Douglas’ cultural characteristics. There are distinguished two leading tendencies in methodology of cross-cultural psychology that were formed in 1990-ies. The comparative analysis of the main empirical approaches of the named period is made (G. Hofstede, S. Schwartz, M. Bond). Methodological schemata and results of cross-cultural researches made within the framework of social representations conception are discussed.
Keywords
Сross-cultural approaches, intercultural differences, social representations.
Date of publication
03.01.2004
Number of purchasers
0
Views
545
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Abul'khanova K.A. Rossijskij mentalitet: kross- kul'turnyj i tipologicheskij podkhody // Rossijskij mentalitet: voprosy psikhologicheskoj teorii i praktiki. M., 1997. S. 7-37.            
    2. 

  2. Andreeva G.M. V poiskakh novoj paradigmy: traditsii i starty XXI v. // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya v sovremennom mire. M., 2002. S. 9-26.
    3. 

  3. Emel'yanova T.P. Sotsial'noe predstavlenie - ponyatie i kontseptsiya: itogi poslednego desyatiletiya // Psikhol. zhurn. 2001. T. 22. № 6. S. 39-47.        
    4. 

  4. Emel'yanova T.P. Sotsial'noe predstavlenie kak instrument kollektivnoj pamyati (na primere vospominanij o Velikoj Otechestvennoj vojne) // Psikhol. zhurn. 2002. T. 23. № 4. S. 56-66.           
    5. 

  5. Znakov V.V. Krosskul'turnye razlichiya v ponimanii lzhi // Rossijskij mentalitet: psikhologiya lichnosti, soznanie, sotsial'nye predstavleniya. M., 1996. S. 73-85.              
    6. 

  6. Lebedeva N.M. Vvedenie v ehtnicheskuyu i kross-kul'turnuyu psikhologiyu. M., 1999.                
    7. 

  7. Lebedeva N.M. Bazovye tsennosti russkikh na rubezhe XXI veka // Psikhol. zhurn. 2000. T. 21. № 3. S. 73-87.
    8. 

  8. Stefanenko T.G. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya v kul'turno-istoricheskoj perspektive // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya v sovremennom mire. M., 2002. S. 27
    9. 

  9. Bond M, Smith P. Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology: Coming of age? // Annual review of psychology. 1996. № 47. P. 205-235.
    10. 

  10. Doise W, Spini D, Clemence A. Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context // European j. of social psychology. 1999. № 29. P. 1-29.
    11. 

  11. Douglas M. Introduction to grid/group analysis // Essays in the sociology of perception. L., 1982. P. 1-8.
    12. 

  12. Fifth European regional congress: programme and abstracts. Winchester, UK. July 7-11, 2001.
    13. 

  13. Goodwin R, Emelyanova T. The privatization of the personal? II: Attitudes to the family and child-rearing values in modern-day Russia // J. of social and personal relationships. 1995. V. 12. № 1. P. 132-138.
    14. 

  14. Goodwin R, Emelyanova T. The perestroika of the family? Gender and occupational differences in family values in modern day Russia // Sex roles. 1995. № 5/6. V. 32. P. 337-351.
    15. 

  15. Goodwin R., Nizharadze G, Nguyen Luu LA, Kosa E., Emelyanova T. Glasnost and the art of conversation: A multilevel analysis of intimate disclosure across three former communist cultures // Cross-cultural psychology. 1999. V. 30. № 1. P. 72-90.    
    16. 

  16. Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. L.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1991.
    17. 

  17. Lacassagn, M.-F., Salès-Wuillemin E., Castel P., Je-brane A. La catégorisation d'un exogroupe a travers une tache d'association de mots // Papers on social representations, textes sur les représentations sociales. 2001. № 10. P. 1-11.
    18. 

  18. Leung K., Bond M. On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons // J. of cross-cultural psychology. 1989. № 20. P. 133-151.  
    19. 

  19. Lonner W., Dinnel D., Forgays D, Hayes S. (eds.). Merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology: selected papers from the fourteenth international congress of the International association for cross-cultural psychology. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1999.
    20. 

  20. Markova I, Moodie E, Farr R. et al. Social representations of the individual: a post-communist perspective // European j. of social psychology. 1998. V. 28. № 5. P. 797-827.
    21. 

  21. Saraswathi T.S. Many deities, one god: Towards convergence in cultural and cross-cultural psychology // Culture & psychology. 1998. № 4(2). P.147-160.             
    22. 

  22. Schwartz S.H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries // Advances in experimental social psychology. N.Y., 1992. V. 25. P. 11-66.
    23. 

  23. Social psychology in cross-cultural perspective. N.Y., 1993.
    24. 

  24. Triandis H.C. Culture and social behaviour. N.Y., 1994.
    25. 

  25. Wagner W, Valencia J, Elejabarrieta F. Relevance, discourse and the "hot" stable core of social representations - A structural analysis of word associations // British j. of social psychology. 1996. V. 35. № 3. P. 331351.
    26. 

  26.   Vo E.D. Merging or diverging? Future directions in cross-cultural psychology // Culture & psychology. 2001. V. 7. № 1. P.105-114.   
    27.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate