Везде
METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT-OBJECT RELATIONS IN HIGH TECHNOLOGIES SPHERE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT-OBJECT RELATIONS IN HIGH TECHNOLOGIES SPHERE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
YURI GOLIKOV 
Abstract
Aspects of the approach of equivalent subject relations and the contents of active strategy of decision of a potentiality problem for man–machine complexes are specified and evolved as a result of consideration of the given objects in the structure of socio-technical associations. Possible variants of methodological positions of theanalysis of subject-object relations for socio-technical networks and for new areas of high technologies are proposed. The necessity of interaction integrative kinds' formation between collective subjects and harmonizationof relations between collective subjects and society and nature is postulated.
Keywords
Нigh technologies, subject-object relations, subject-subject relations, man–machine complex, socio-technical network, object complexity, subject complexity, potential uncertainty.
Date of publication
03.05.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
548
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Aleksandrov V.V., Kuleshov S.V. Komp'yuternyj simulyator rechevizual'nogo interfejsa upravleniya i kontrolya letatel'nym apparatom//Chelovecheskij faktor v aviatsii i kosmonavtike: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov/Pod red. A.A. Medenkova. M.: Polet, 2007. S. 67-70.
    2. 

  2. Blauberg I.V., Mirskij Eh.M., Sadovskij V.N. Sistemnyj podkhod i sistemnyj analiz//Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik 1982. M.: Nauka, 1982. S. 47-64.
    3. 

  3. Golikov Yu.Ya. Metodologicheskie podkhody k resheniyu psikhologicheskikh problem proektirovaniya sovremennoj tekhniki//Psikhol. zhurn. 2004. T. 25. № 1. S. 70-82.
    4. 

  4. Golikov Yu.Ya. Metodologiya psikhologicheskikh problem proektirovaniya tekhniki. M.: PER SEh, 2003.
    5. 

  5. Golikov Yu.Ya. Problemy aktualizatsii potentsial'nykh svojstv slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh ob'ektov//Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. T. 26. № 2. S. 57-67.
    6. 

  6. Guriev V. Posle zavtra: 2006-2100//Komp'yuterra. 5 sentyabrya 2006. № 32 (652). S. 34-43.
    7. 

  7. Davydov A.A. Sistemnyj podkhod v sotsiologii: novye napravleniya, teorii i metody analiza sotsial'nykh sistem. M.: Editorial URSS, 2004.
    8. 

  8. Dubrovskij D.I. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i problema soznaniya//Filosofiya iskusstvennogo intellekta: Materialy Vserossijskoj mezhdistsiplinarnoj konferentsii, g. Moskva, MIEhM, 17-19 yanvarya 2005 g. M.: IF RAN, 2005. S. 26-31.
    9. 

  9. Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya kollektivnogo sub'ekta//Psikhologiya individual'nogo i kollektivnogo sub'ektov/Pod red. A.V. Brushlinskogo. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2002. S. 51-81.
    10. 

  10. Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologiya sovmestnoj deyatel'nosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2005.
    11. 

  11. Zarakovskij G.M. Ehrgonomicheskoe proektirovanie operatsional'nogo komponenta deyatel'nosti: teoreticheskaya osnova i metodologiya//Problemy fundamental'noj i prikladnoj psikhologii professional'noj deyatel'nosti/Pod red. V.A. Bodrova i A.L. Zhuravleva. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008. S. 162-180.
    12. 

  12. Ivanov A.I., Lapa V.V. Inzhenerno-psikhologicheskie problemy proektirovaniya nashlemnoj sistemy indikatsii dlya letchika//Problemy fundamental'noj i prikladnoj psikhologii professional'noj deyatel'nosti/Pod red. V.A. Bodrova i A.L. Zhuravleva. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2008. S. 340-352.
    13. 

  13. Kostin A.N., Golikov Yu.Ya. Psikhologicheskie problemy vysokikh tekhnologij: Materialy itogovoj nauchnoj konferentsii Instituta psikhologii RAN (1-2 fevralya 2006 g.). M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2006. S. 97-108.
    14. 

  14. Kudrin B.I. Issledovaniya tekhnicheskikh sistem kak soobschestv izdelij -tekhnotsenozov//Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik 1980. M.: Nauka, 1981. S. 236-254.
    15. 

  15. Lenorovits D., Fillips M. Proektirovanie ehrgonomicheskikh trebovanij k sistemam upravleniya vozdushnym dvizheniem//Chelovecheskij faktor. M.: Mir, 1991. T. 4. S. 320-351.
    16. 

  16. L'vov V.M., Shlaen P.Ya. Ehrgonomika. Vvodnyj kurs: Uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov. Tver': OOO Izd-vo “Triada”, 2004.
    17. 

  17. Munipov V.M., Zinchenko V.P. Ehrgonomika: chelovekoorientirovannoe proektirovanie tekhniki, programmnykh sredstv i sredy: Uchebnik. M.: Logos, 2001.
    18. 

  18. Narin'yani A.S. Mezhdu ehvolyutsiej i sverkhvysokimi tekhnologiyami: novyj chelovek blizhajshego buduschego//Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 4. S. 3-17.
    19. 

  19. Rozin V.M. Tekhnika i sotsial'nost'//Voprosy filosofii. 2005. № 5. S. 95-107.
    20. 

  20. Sil'vestrov M.M., Chernyshev V.A. Integrirovannye kompleksy avioniki//Chelovecheskij faktor v aviatsii i kosmonavtike: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov/Pod red. A.A. Medenkova. M.: Polet, 2007. S. 226-231.
    21. 

  21. Stankevich L.A. Problemy razvitiya gumanoidnoj robototekhniki//Filosofiya iskusstvennogo intellekta: Materialy Vserossijskoj mezhdistsiplinarnoj konferentsii, g. Moskva, MIEhM, 17-19 yanvarya 2005 g. M.: IF RAN, 2005. S. 126-128.
    22. 

  22. Stepin V.S., Gorokhov V.G., Rozov M.A. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. M.: Gardariki, 1999.
    23. 

  23. Uorvik K. Nastuplenie mashin. M.: Nauka/Interperiodika, 1999.
    24. 

  24. Khendrik Kh. Proektirovanie organizatsionnykh struktur//Chelovecheskij faktor. M.: Mir, 1991. T. 4. S. 272-319.
    25. 

  25. Shlaen P.Ya. Perspektivy razvitiya ehrgonomicheskogo obespecheniya sozdaniya i ehkspluatatsii cheloveko-mashinnykh kompleksov//Problemy psikhologii i ehrgonomiki. Tver'-Yaroslavl', 2001. № 3(13). S. 4-10.
    26. 

  26. Alexander A.L., Wickens Ch.D., Hardy Th.J. Synthetic Vision Systems: The Effects of Guidance Symbology, Display Size, and Field of View//Human Factors. V. 47. № 4. Winter 2005. P. 693-707.
    27. 

  27. Billings Ch.E. Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
    28. 

  28. Bubb-Lewis C., Scerbo M.W. Getting to know you: human-computer communication in adaptive automation//Human-Automation Interaction: Research and Practice/Ed. by M. Mouloua, J.M. Koonce. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1997. P. 92-99.
    29. 

  29. Miller Ch.A., Parasuraman R. Designing for Flexible Interaction between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control//Human Factors. V. 49. № 1. February 2007. P. 57-75.
    30. 

  30. Russel S., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. N.Y.: Prentice Hall, 2003.
    31.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate