Везде
SUBJECTIVE ECONOMICAL WELL-BEING: STRUCTURE-AND-LEVEL ORGANISATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
SUBJECTIVE ECONOMICAL WELL-BEING: STRUCTURE-AND-LEVEL ORGANISATION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
VALERY KHASHCHENKO 
Abstract
Structure-and-level approach to well-being psychology study is described in the article. Subjective well-being (SWB) is revealed as polyphenomenological formation the essence and specificity of which are determined by the organization of its structural components. Such data concerning regularities of SWB’s level organisation as: not reducing of SWB level to additive totality of forming patr of it components; determination of SWB level by the effects of system integration of its components; the existence of “general” and “specific” factors in the SWB structure are presented.
Keywords
subjective economical well-being, structure and level of SWB, actual subjective economical wellbeing, structure-and-level conception.
Date of publication
01.01.2008
Number of purchasers
2
Views
498
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Baranova A.V. Ehkonomiko-psikhologicheskie determinanty sub'ektivnogo kachestva zhizni: Avtoref. dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2005.
    2. 

  2. Buchatskaya M.V. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie rabotayuschikh zhenschin: Avtoref. dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2006.
    3. 

  3. Karpov A.V. Zakonomernosti strukturnoj organizatsii refleksivnykh protsessov // Psikhol. zhurn. 2006. T. 27. № 6. S. 18-29.
    4. 

  4. Fesenko P.P. Osmyslennost' zhizni i psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti: Avtoref. dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2005.
    5. 

  5. Khaschenko V.A. Model' sub'ektivnogo ehkonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya (soobschenie 1) // Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. T. 26. № 3. C. 38-50.
    6. 

  6. Khaschenko V.A. Ehkonomiko-psikhologicheskaya model' sub'ektivnogo ehkonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya (soobschenie 2) // Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. T. 26. № 4. C. 5-19.
    7. 

  7. Khaschenko V.A. Tipologiya sub'ektivnogo ehkonomicheskogo blagopoluchiya // Psikhol. zhurn. 2007. T. 28. № 1. S. 58-70.
    8. 

  8. Shevelenkova T.D., Fesenko P.P. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti (obzor osnovnykh kontseptsij i metodologicheskoe issledovanie) // Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. 2005. № 3. S. 95-130.
    9. 

  9. Andrews F.M., Robinson J.P. Measures of Subjective Well-being // Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes / Eds. J.P. Robinson, P.P. Shaver, L.S. Wrightman. San Diego, 1992. P. 61-114.
    10. 

  10. Bradburn N.M. The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine, 1969.
    11. 

  11. Cantril H. The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick. NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1965.
    12. 

  12. Diener E. Subjective Well-being // Psychological Bulletin. 1984. V. 95. № 3. P. 542-575.
    13. 

  13. Diener E., Suh E., Oishi S. Recent Findings on Subjective Well-being // Journ. of Clinical Psychology. 1997.
    14. 

  14. Diener E., Biswas-Diener R. New directions in subjective well-being research: the cutting edge. Mimeo univ. of Illinois. 2000.
    15. 

  15. Diener E., Seligman M.E.P. Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2004. № 5.
    16. 

  16. Diener E., Tov W. Subjective well-being and peace // Journ. of Social Issues. 2007. № 63(2). P. 421-440.
    17. 

  17. Easterlin R.A. Income and Happiness: A unified theory // Economic Journal. 2001. V. 111. P. 1-20.
    18. 

  18. Easterlin R. Life cycle happiness and its sources. Intersections of psychology, economics and demography // Journ. of Economic Psychology. 2006. № 27. P. 463-482
    19. 

  19. McKennell A.C. Cognition and affect in perception of well-being // Social Indicators research. 1978. V. 5. № 4. P. 389-426.
    20. 

  20. Van Praag B.M.S., Frijters P., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. The structure of Model Well-Being. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. 1998. V. 129/3.
    21.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate