FUNDAMENTAL AND STRATEGIC PROCESSES OF SEMANTIC RELATION’S RECOGNITION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
FUNDAMENTAL AND STRATEGIC PROCESSES OF SEMANTIC RELATION’S RECOGNITION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
The results of empirical research of processes of fundamental and strategic organization of cognitive processes on the example of semantic tasks solving are presented. The Ss had to assess the presence of categorical or thematic correlations in stimuli pairs (“the apple-the fruit”, “the apple-the garden”). The introductive stimulus preceded the manifestation of each pair. There were used three types of preprocessing: categorical, thematic and neutral ones. The duration of preprocessing interval varied from 400 ms to 1200 ms. The data obtained showed that the assessment of thematic relations involves activity of fundamental organization of cognition only and assessment of categorical relations requires participation of decision making’ cognitive strategies. It is concluded that the nature of cognitive procedures of information processing differs in conditions of thematic and categorical relations.
Keywords
Кnowledge organization, fundamental organization, cognitive automotive mechanisms, strategic organization, categorical relations, thematic relations.
Date of publication
03.03.2004
Number of purchasers
0
Views
464
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000617-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 21.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Velichkovskij B.M. Sovremennaya kognitivnaya psikhologiya. M.: MGU, 1983.
  2. Vysokov I.E. Kategorial'naya i tematicheskaya organizatsiya v pamyati: Avtoref. dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 1993.          
  3. Vysokov I.E. Tematicheskij kontekst v sisteme organizatsii estestvennykh kategorij // Psikhol. zhurn. 2002. № 5. S. 73-79.
  4. Vysokov I.E. Tipichnost' v semanticheskom kontekste // Psikhol. zhurn. 1999. № 3. S. 105-110.
  5. Vysokov I.E. Ehffekty tipichnosti v zadachakh raspoznavaniya semanticheskikh otnoteniya // Psikhol. zhurn. 1996. № 6. S. 95-101.
  6. Vysokov I.E., Lyusin D.V. Vnutrennyaya struktura estestvennykh kategorij: tipichnost' // Psikhol. zhurn. 1998. № 6. S. 103-111.               
  7. Dormashev D.B., Romanov V.Ya. Psikhologiya vnimaniya. M.: Trivola, 1995.
  8. Collins A., Quillian M.R. Retrieval from semantic memory // J. of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1969. V. 8. P. 240-247.
  9. Hasher L., Zacks R.T. Automatic and effortful processes in memory // J. of Experimental Psychology: General. 1979. V. 108. P. 356-388.
  10. Hill H., Schyns P.G., Akamatsu S. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition // Cognition. 1997. V. 62. P. 201-222.
  11. Hoffmann J. Das aktive Gedächtnis. Berlin: VEB, 1982. (Russkij perevod: Khoffman I. Aktivnaya pamyat'. M.: Progress, 1986.)
  12. Kintsch W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  13. Klix F., Hoffmann J., van der Meer E. The storage of concepts and their cognitive application / Eds. Le Ny J.F., Kintsch W. Language and comprehension. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1982. P. 3-16.
  14. McKoon G., Ratcliff R. Interferences about contextualy defined categories // J. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1989. V. 15. P. 1134-1146.  
  15. Posner M.I. Chronometric exploration of mind. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  16. Ryle G. The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson, 1948.
  17. Schank R.C. Explanation patterns: Understanding me-chanicaly and creatively. Hilsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1986.
  18. Schneider W, Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I Detection, search, and attention // Psychological Review. 1977. V. 84. P. 1-66.
  19. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II Perceptual Learning, attending, and a general theory // Psychological Review. 1977. V. 84. P. 127-190.
  20. Snodgrass J.G., Corvin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory // J. Exp. Psychol. General. 1988. V. 117. P. 34-50.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate