Везде
WORDS CATEGORIZATION AS A METHOD FOR INTERSYSTEM RELATIONS STUDY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
WORDS CATEGORIZATION AS A METHOD FOR INTERSYSTEM RELATIONS STUDY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000617-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
MarchenkoO. P.  Boris Bezdenezhnykh
Abstract
From the viewpoint of the system psychophysiology the structure of individual experience is presented as domains, i.e. set of functional systems in which the experience of interaction of the subject with objects of the same category is fixed. Relations of different domains systems is the basis for all forms of experience realization. The specificity of relations between systems belonging to the same or different domains of individual experience is revealed in the study by means of words categorization procedure with semantic priming and peculiarities of these domains structure are described. It is shown that rate and accuracy of categorization is higher, if two successively presented words are of the same category. The response time in this case is shorter for words of living categories in comparison with nonliving ones due to that priming effect is greater for living categories.
Keywords
the structure of individual experience, domains of individual experience, functional systems, intersystem relations, semantic priming, categorization.
Date of publication
01.05.2008
Number of purchasers
2
Views
499
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000617-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 20.11.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Azizova Yu.R., Marchenko O.P., Bezdenezhnykh B.N. Chastotnye kharakteristiki semanticheskikh kategorij // Sbornik statej mezhvuzovskoj konferentsii molodykh uchenykh i studentov "Nauchnyj potentsial KhKhI veka" M.: OOO "Dobi ehnd Ko", 2007. S. 12-18.
    2. 

  2. Bezdenezhnykh B.N. Dinamika vzaimodejstviya funktsional'nykh sistem v strukture deyatel'nosti. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2004.
    3. 

  3. Pavlov I.P. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1949.
    4. 

  4. Ushakova T.N., Pavlova N.D. Aspekty issledovaniya semantiki slova // Psikhol. zhurn. 1981. T. 2. № 5. C. 23-34.
    5. 

  5. Shvyrkov V.B. Vvedenie v ob'ektivnuyu psikhologiyu: Nejronal'nye osnovy psikhiki: Izbrannye trudy. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2006.
    6. 

  6. Capitani E., Laiacona M., Mahon B., Caramazza A. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence // Cognitive neuropsychology. 2003. V. 20. № 3-6. P. 213-261.
    7. 

  7. Caramazza A., Shelton J.R. Domain specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction // Journ. of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1998. V. 10. № 1. P. 1-34.
    8. 

  8. Damasio H., Tranel D., Grabowski T. et al. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval // Cognition. 2004. V. 92. R. 179-229.
    9. 

  9. Diesendruck G., Gelman S.A. Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: Evidence for an essentialist account of categorization // Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1999. V. 6. № 2. P. 338-346.
    10. 

  10. Durrant-Peatfield M.R., Tyler L.K., Moss H.E., Levy J.P. The distinctiveness of form and function in category structure: A connectionist model // Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society / Eds. M.G. Shafto, L. P. Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. P. 193-198.
    11. 

  11. Freedman D.J., Riesenhuber M., Poggio T., Miller E.K. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex // Science. 2001. V. 291. P. 312-316.
    12. 

  12. Henson R.N., Shallice T., Dolan R.J. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming // Science. 2000. V. 287. P. 1269-1271.
    13. 

  13. John E.R. Mechanisms of Memory. N.Y.-L.: Academic press, 1967.
    14. 

  14. Martin A., Wiggs C.L., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge // Nature. 1996. V. 379. P. 649-652.
    15. 

  15. Kiefer M. Repetition-priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems // Journ. of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2005. V. 17. № 2. P. 199-210.
    16. 

  16. McNamara T.P. Theories of Priming: I. Associative Distance and Lag // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1992. V. 18. № 6. P. 1173-1190.
    17. 

  17. Messinger A., Squire L.R., Zola S.M., Albright T.D. Neural Correlates of Knowledge: Stable Representation of Stimulus Associations across Variations in Behavioral Performance // Neuron. 2005. V. 48. № 20. P. 359-371.
    18. 

  18. Meyer D.E., Osman A.M., Irwin D.E., Yantis S. Modern mental chronometry // Biological Psychology. 1988. V. 26. № 1-3. P. 3-67.
    19. 

  19. Ratcliff R., McKoon G.A. Retrieval theory of priming in memory // Psychological Review. 1988. V. 95. P. 385-408.
    20. 

  20. Ross B.H. The effects of category use on learned ca-tegories // Memory and Cognition. 2000. V. 28. № 1. R. 51-63.
    21. 

  21. Sara S.J. Retrieval and reconsolidation: toward a neurobilogy of remembering // Learning and Memory. 2000. V. 7. № 2. R. 73-84.
    22. 

  22. Schacter D.L., Buckner R.L. Priming and the Brain // Neuron. 1998. V. 20. № 2. P. 185-195.
    23. 

  23. Spitzer M., Kischka U., Guckel F. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of category-specific cortical activation: evidence for semantic maps // Cognitive Brain Research. 1998. V. 6. P. 309-319.
    24. 

  24. Thorpe S.J., Fabre-Thorpe M. Seeking Categories in the Brain // Science. 2001. V. 291. P. 260-263.
    25. 

  25. Tulving E., Thomson D. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory // Psychol. Rev. 1973. V. 80. P. 352-372.
    26. 

  26. Tyler L., Moss H. Functional properties of concepts: Studies of normal and brain damaged patients // Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1997. V. 14. R. 511-545.
    27. 

  27. Wolff P., Medin D.L., Pankratz C. Evolution and devolution of folkbiological knowledge // Cognition. 1999. V. 73. № 2. R. 177-204.
    28.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate