Везде
CONCERNING PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF SITUATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
CONCERNING PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY OF SITUATION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000621-0-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N. Mikhailov  Leonid Burlachuk
Abstract
The principles of situational approach in psychological researches are systemized. The content of contemporary psychological theory of situation is analyzed from three explorative aspects: 1) psychological peculiarities of every-day situations of human life with interrelation of situational and personal variables; 2) subjective inter­ pretation of situations, their cognitive-emotional representations; 3) behavioral strategies and another forms of activity in the context of concrete situations. The main proposition of this theory allows to explain interaction of a man and situation in c ynamics and to analyze situation-related changes in mind and behavior of a man.
Keywords
situation, event subject of activity, subjective interpretation of situation, cognitive-emotional representation of situation, dynamics, behavior
Date of publication
01.01.2002
Number of purchasers
0
Views
419
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000621-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 02.06.2021
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Abul'khanova-Slavskaya K.A. Sotsial'noe myshle­
 nie lichnosti: problemy i strategii issledova­ niya // Psikhol. zhurn. 1994. № 4. S. 39-55.
 2. Anan'ev B.G. O problemakh sovremennogo chelove- koznaniya. M., 1977.
 3. Antsyferova L.A. Psikhologiya povsednevnosti: Zhiznennyj mir lichnosti i “tekhniki” ee bytiya // Psikhol. zhurn. 1993. № 2. S. 3-16.
 4. Barabanschikov V.A. Problemy psikhologicheskogo otrazheniya v trudakh B.F. Lomova // Psikhol. zhurn 1994. №5. S. 5-12.
 5. Bruner Dzh. Psikhologiya poznaniya. M., 1977.
 6. Brushlinskij A.V. Problemy psikhologii sub'ek­ ta. M., 1994.
 7. Burlachuk L.F., Korzhova E.Yu. Psikhologiya zhiz­nennykh situatsij. M., 1998.
 8. Burlachuk L.F., Korzhova E.Yu. Individual'no­ psikhologicheskie osobennosti bol'nykh serdechno­ sosudistymi zabolevaniyami v protsesse ikh sotsi­al'noj adaptatsii // Psikhol. zhurn. 1992. № 3. S. 112-120.
 9. Velichkovskij B.M., Zinch.enko V.P., Luriya A.R. Psikhologiya vospriyatiya. M., 1975.
 10. Gak V.G. Vyskazyvanie i situatsiya // Problemy strukturnoj lingvistiki. M., 1972.
 11. Gibson Dzh. Psikhologicheskij podkhod k zritel'no­ mu vospriyatiyu. M., 1988.
 12. Gregori R. Glaz i mozg. M., 1970.
 13. Dikaya L.G., Makhnach A.V. Otnoshenie cheloveka k neblagopriyatnym zhiznennym sobytiyam i fakto­ ry ikh formirovaniya // Psikhol. zhurn. 1996. № 3.
 S .137-148.
 14. Druzhinin V.N. Situatsionnyj podkhod k psikholo­ gicheskoj diagnostike sposobnostej // Psikhol. zhurn. 1991. № 2. S. 94-104.
 15. Zinchenko V.P., Mamardashvili M.K. Problema ob'ektivnogo metoda v psikhologii // Voprosy fi­ losofii. 1977. №7. S. 109-125.
 16. Klimov E.A. Ob obraze mira u predstavitelej raznotipnykh professij Ts Psikhologicheskoe obo­ zrenie. 1995. № 1. S. 49-54.
 17. Korzhova E.Yu. Chelovek boleyuschij: Lichnost' i so­ tsial'naya adaptatsiya. S-Peterburg, 1994.
 18. Korzhova E.Yu. Metodika “Psikhologicheskaya avto- biografiya” v psikhodiagnostike zhiznennykh situa' tsij. Kiev, 1994.
 19. Leont'ev A.N. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. M-, 1972.
 20. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheski6 problemy psikhologii. M., 1984.
 21. Logvinenko A D . Zritel'noe vospriyatie prost­ ranstva. M., 1981.
 22. Loginova N.A. Zhiznennyj put' cheloveka kak pr°' blema psikhologii // Voprosy psikhol. 1985. № S .103-109.
 23. Luriya A.R. Yazyk i soznanie. M., 1972.
 24. Mikhajlova N.B. Opyt psikhologicheskogo issledo­ vaniya situatsii bezrabotitsy I Psikhol. zhurn. 1998- № 6. S. 91-102.
 25. Mikhajlova N.B. Psikhologicheskoe issledovanie situatsii ehmigratsii I Psikhol. zhurn. 2000. № *• S. 26-38.
 26. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psikhosemantiki. MGU, 1997.
 27. Problema sub'ekta v psikhologicheskoj nauke. 2000.
 28. L. Ross, R. Nisbett. Chelovek i situatsiya. M., 2000.
 29. Rubinshtejn S L. Problemy obschej psikhologii. M., 1976.
 30. Stalin V.V. Issledovanie porozhdeniya zritel'­ nogo prostranstva obraza I Vospriyatie i deyatel' nost'. M., 1976.
 31. Uvarova V.I. Problemy klassifikatsii situatsij sotsialisticheskogo obraza zhizni // Psikhologiya lichnosti i obraz zhizni. M., 1987.
 32. Ushakova T.N. i dr. Slovo v dejstvii. S.-Peter­ burg, 2000.
 33. Shorokhova E.V. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskoe poni­ manie lichnosti Ts Metodologicheskie problemy sotsial'noj psikhologii. M., 1975.
 34. Abelson R.P. The psychological status of the script con­ cept// American Psychologist. 1981. № 36. P. 715—729.
 35. Argyle M., Furham A., Graham J.A. Social situations // Cambridge univ. pr., 1981.
 36. Asch S.E. Social psychology. New York, 1952.
 37. Ball D.W. The definition of the situation Ts J. of Theory in Social Behavior. 1972. № 2. P. 61—82.
 38. Barker R.G. Ecological psychology. Stanford, 1968.
 39. Bartlett F.C. Remembering. Cambridge, 1932.
 40. Bowers K.S. Situationism in psychology Ts Psychologi­ cal Review. 1973. V. 80. P. 307-336.
 41. Burlatchuk L., Mikhailova N. Psychologische Theone der Situation. Kongress der DPG. 2000. Jena. 42.
 42. Cantor N., Kihistorm J.F. Personality and social intelli­ gence. Prentice-Hall, 1987.
 43. Caprara G.V. Structures and Processes in Personality Psychology // European Psychologist. 1996. № 1-P. 14-17.
 44. Domer D. Logik des MiBlingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen. Rowohlt, 1989.
 45. De Longis A. etc. Relationship of daily hassles, upliftes and major life events to health status Ts Health Psychol. 19482. V. 1.
 46. Endler N., Magnusson D. Interactional Psychology and Personality. New York, 1976.
 47. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stand­ ford, 1957.
 48. Fisseni H.J. Selbstinterpretation und Selbstregulation des Individuums. Gottingen, 1985.
 49. Forgas J.P. The persertion of social episodes // J. of Per­ sonality and Social Psychology. 1976. V. 33 P 199— 209.
 50. Graumann C.F. Person und Situation. In: Entwicklung und Personlichkeit. Berlin, 1975.
 51. Gilbert D.T., Jones E.E. Perseiver-induced constratints: Interpretationof self-generated reality //J. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986. V. 50. P. 269-280.
 52. Herrmann T., Grabowski J. Sprechen. Spektrum, Heil- delberg, 1994.
 53. Hamilton D.L. ect. The formation of stereotypic be­ liefs// J. of Personality and Social Psychology 1985 V .48. P. 5-17.
 54. Jones E.E. The rocky road from acts to dispositions // American Psychologist. 1979. V. 34. P. 107-117.
 55. Kelly H.H. The psychology of personal constructs New York, 1955.
 56. Lewin K. Field theory in social science. New York 1951.
 57. Magnusson D. Persons in situatins // Personality psy­ chology in Europe. London. 1984. V. 1.
 58. Magnusson D. A psychology of situations. In: Toward a psychology of situations. An interactional perspective.
 Erlbaum, 1981. P. 9-32.
 59. Montada L. Entwicklungspsychologie. Ausgabe, 1996.
 BLTZ, 4.
 60. Mischel W. Intoduction to Personality. 3rd ed. New York etc., 1984.
 61. Moscovici S. etc. Studies in social influence: V. Minority influence and conversion behavior in perceptual task // J. of Experimental Social Psychology. 1980. V. 16. P. 270-282.
 62. Nisbett R.E. Violence and U.S. regional culture // Amer­ ican Psychologist. 1993. V. 48. 
 63. Piaget J. The child’s conception of physical causality. London, 1930.
 64. Hoss L. Situationist perspectives on the obedience ex­ periments // Contemporary Psychology. 1988. V. 33. P. 101-104.
 65. Thomae H. Das Individuum und seine Welt, Gottingen, 1996.
 66. Thomas W., Znaniecki F. The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago, 1918.
 67. Schank R., Abelson R. Scripts, plans, goals, and under­ standing. Erbaum, 1977. 68. Schott E. Psychologic der Situation. Heidelberg, 1991.
 69. Shweder R. Thinning through cultures. Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge, 1991.
 70. Watson J. Behaviorism. New York, 1930.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate