Везде
Macro- and microparameters of communicative behavior in large groups of social networks
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Macro- and microparameters of communicative behavior in large groups of social networks
Annotation
PII
S0205959225010054-1
DOI
10.31857/S0205959225010054
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. S. Gorbacheva 
Occupation: Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, Director of the Center of Educational Program Implementation
Affiliation: Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
V. Nikishina
Occupation: Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, ScD (Psychology), Head of the Department of Clinical Psychology
Affiliation: Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
M. Y. Kazaryan
Occupation: Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, PhD (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Educational Psychology
Affiliation: Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
E. Petrash
Occupation: Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work, ScD (Psychology), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Clinical Psychology
Affiliation: Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Edition
Volume 46 Issue number 1
Pages
45-57
Abstract
Modern society is characterized by the shift of the communicative behavior mode of student youth to the digital social space, in particular to social networks. This study is aimed at considering the macro- and microparameters of the communicative behavior of students in large groups in social networks using the open “Vkontakte” group as an example. In the study, macroparameters are the number of participants, posts, comments, responses to comments, reposts and views, while microparameters are communicative strategies, message modality, and message topics. The study of the parameters of communicative behavior was carried out by analyzing publications in an open “Vkontakte” group thematically focused on the university environment. The main methods of the empirical research were the method of critical discourse analysis and content analysis. The research period was 12 months (April 2023 — March 2024). 98 posts, 663 comments and 998 responses to comments were analyzed. The conducted study allowed to identify a tendency of proportional relationship between the number of posts and the number of comments at the level of macroparameters. The larger and more emotional the post, the more comments to it and responses to comments there are. At the level of microparameters, the prevalence of confrontational communication strategies characterizing conflict behavior was established, especially in the case of emotionally charged messages. The discovered prevalence of the passive position of communication participants in the digital social environment is manifested in a greater number of reposts and likes compared to comments and text messages. This can be explained by the fact that writing comments and responses to them requires an active position, manifested in independent formulation and presentation of information, while reacting to a message is easier and requires less effort. There is also a stable tendency for negative messages to prevail in modality, regardless of the form of communicative behavior in the digital social environment. The larger the social group, the more often negative messages and comments to such posts can be found.
Keywords
социальные сети коммуникативное поведение онлайн-коммуникация параметры сообщений модальность сообщений речевые единицы
Received
16.04.2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
19
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Аналитическая исследовательская компания Mediascope. URL: https://mediascope.net (дата обращения: 08.09.2024).

2. Андреева Г.М. Социальная психология. Учебник для вузов. М.: Изд-во “Аспект Пресс”, 1996.

3. Анохина В.С. Стратегии и тактики коммуникативного поведения в малой социальной группе (семье) // Наука. Инновации. Технологии. 2008. № 3. С. 64–71.

4. Балакина Ю. В. Электронный текст: принципиально новый тип текста? // Вестник ВолГУ. 2016. № 3. С. 17–27.

5. Гамбеева Ю.Н., Сорокина Е.И. Цифровая трансформация современного образовательного процесса // Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. 2020. № 5. С. 35–43.

6. Гуськова С. В. Основы теории коммуникации: учебно-методическое пособие. М.: ФЛИНТА, 2013.

7. Горбачева А.С., Казарян М.Ю. Библиометрический анализ научных публикаций по проблематике коммуникативного поведения // Известия Юго-Западного государственного университета. Серия: Лингвистика и педагогика. 2024. С. 125–146.

8. Дускаева Л.Р., Краснова Т. И. Интенциональность и модализация медиатекста в контексте культуры (опыт обобщения) // Политическая лингвистика. 2014. № 3. С. 51–57.

9. Кирьякова А.В., Каргапольцева Н.А., Белоновская И.Д., Дужников С.А. Развитие молодежных сообществ в экосистеме университета — ресурсы, проекты и риски // Высшее образование в России. 2022. Т. 31. № 8–9. С. 116–136.

10. Клюев Е.В. Речевая коммуникация М.: ПРИОР, 1998.

11. Никишина В.Б., Петраш Е.А., Запесоцкая И.В. Лингвосемантические характеристики коммуникативного поведения молодежи в социальных сетях // Психологический журнал. 2017. Т. 38. № 5. С. 69–79.

12. Никишина В.Б., Петраш Е.А., Моргун А.Н., Запесоцкая И.В. Трансформация параметров сообщений молодежи в социальных сетях // Психологический журнал. 2020. Т. 41. № 4. С. 78–91.

13. Система мониторинга социальных медиа “BrandAnalytics”. URL: https://br-analytics.ru (дата обращения: 08.09.2024).

14. Сковородников А.П. О необходимости разграничения понятий “риторический прием”, “стилистическая фигура”, “речевая тактика”, “речевой жанр” в практике терминологической лексикографии // Риторика — Лингвистика. Вып. 5: Сб. статей. Смоленск: СГПУ. 2004. С. 5–11.

15. Стернин И.А., Камбаралиева У.Д. Теоретические проблемы описания коммуникативного поведения // Коммуникативные исследования. 2018. № 2 (16). С. 20–34.

16. Bucher T. If… Then. Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2018.

17. Douwes R., Stuttaford M., London L. Social Solidarity, Human Rights, and Collective Action: Considerations in the Implementation of the National Health Insurance in South Africa // Health and Human Rights. 2018. V. 20. P. 185–196.

18. Joo T. M., Teng C.E. Impacts of social media (Facebook) on human communication and relationships: A view on behavioral change and social unity // International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology. 2017. V. 7. P. 27–50.

19. Housley W., Webb H., Williams M. et al. Interaction and transformation on social media: The case of twitter campaigns // Social Media and Society. 2018. V. 4. № 1.

20. O’Keeffe G.S. et al. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families // Pediatrics. 2011. V. 127. P. 800–804.

21. Schwartz H. A. et al. Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach // PloS one. 2013. V. 8. P. e73791.

22. Vošner H.B. et al. Attitudes of active older Internet users towards online social networking // Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. V. 55. P. 230–241.

23. Wonneberger A., Kim S.J. TV News Exposure of Young People in Changing Viewing Environments: A Longitudinal, Cross-national Comparison Using People-meter Data // International Journal of Communication. 2017. V. 11. P. 72–93.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate