RAS Social ScienceПсихологический журнал Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9592
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-588X

Place of “source of law” category - in the legal positivism museum

PII
S102694520014846-1-
DOI
10.31857/S102694520014846-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 5
Pages
68-80
Abstract

The article presents the author’s original concept of understanding and classification of sources of law according to which, they should be considered in respect of three key stages of law lifecycle: law formation, lawmaking, and law enforcement. It is the author's opinion that such approach allows to move beyond the narrow bounds of legal positivism in the interpretation of sources of law, get over the ambiguity and legal uncertainties of the “source of law” term, and to bring about its uniform semantic identification in the process of legal discourse. In terms of the proposed methodology, such debating forms of law as case law, acts of the Constitutional Court, scientific doctrine, and customary law, are assessed.

Keywords
source of law, form of law, source of law formation, source of lawmaking, source of law enforcement
Date of publication
24.05.2021
Year of publication
2021
Number of purchasers
21
Views
3960

References

  1. 1. Great Soviet Encyclopedia: in 30 vols. 3rd ed. / Chief Editor A.M. Prokhorov. M., 1972. Vol. 10. P. 579. 580 (in Russ.).
  2. 2. Globalization and law development: essays / ex. ed. Yu. A. Tikhomirov, A.S. Pigolkin. M., 2004. P. 62 (in Russ.).
  3. 3. Daniliuk S.E. Constitution – the Basic Source of Life Purpose and Civilization Preservation Values // Constitutional justice. Herald of the Eurasian Association of constitutional review bodies. 2020. No. 2 (82). P. 15 - 34 (in Russ.).
  4. 4. Drobyazko S.G. Law Formation, Lawmaking, Establishment of Rights, Subjects and Principles Thereof // Law and Democracy: coll. of res. pap. / ex. ed. V.N. Bibilo. Issue 14. Minsk, 2003. Issue 14. P. 21 (in Russ.).
  5. 5. Zhukov V.N. Law // Philosophy of Law. Dictionary. 2nd ed., dor. and add. / ed. and comp. V.N. Zhukov. M., 2021. P. 539 - 541 (in Russ.).
  6. 6. Zorkin V.D. Precedent Nature of Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation // Journal of Russian Law. 2004. No. 12. P. 5 (in Russ.).
  7. 7. Carbonnier J. Legal Sociology: transl. from French; transl. and intr. art. V.A. Tumanov. M., 1986. P. 143 (in Russ.).
  8. 8. Marx K. and Engels F. Essays. 2nd ed. M., 1955. Vol. 1. P. 66, 67 (in Russ.).
  9. 9. Marchenko M.N. Source of Law: course book. M., 2005. P. 46–53 (in Russ.).
  10. 10. Nersesyants V.S. Court shall not make laws or rule, it shall enforce laws // Case Law as the Source of Law / ex. ed. B.N. Topornin. M., 1997. P. 41 (in Russ.).
  11. 11. General theory of state and law: course book / under gen. ed. of V.A. Kuchinsky. 2nd ed., rev. and amended. M., 2006. P. 346 (in Russ.).
  12. 12. General theory of law: handbook / under gen. ed. of S.G. Drobyazko, S.A. Kalinin. 2nd ed., stereotype. Minsk, 2017. P. 286, 287, 302–307 (in Russ.).
  13. 13. General theory of law: study guide for students majoring in law / author and gen. ed. A.N. Pugachev. Novopolotsk, 2007. P. 62 (in Russ.).
  14. 14. Rubanov A.A. Definition of Source of Law as Demonstration of Metaphoricity of Legal Consciousness // Case Law as the Source of Law / ex. ed. B.N. Topornin. M., 1997. P. 42–47 (in Russ.).
  15. 15. Universal Encyclopedia of Cyril and Methodius // Official website // https://megabook.ru/article/Право (accessed: 30.12.2020) (in Russ.).
  16. 16. Shershenevich G.F. General theory of law. M., 1910. Issue 1. P. 368, 369 (in Russ.).
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library