APPROBATION OF THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE VERSION OF ANALYTIC-HOLISTIC SCALE
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
APPROBATION OF THE RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE VERSION OF ANALYTIC-HOLISTIC SCALE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000367-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
Approbation of the Russian-language version of Analytic-Holistic Scale (N = 260) have been conducted. Convergent validity have been verified by means of Rational-Experiential Inventory (R. Pacini, S. Epstein), Metapersonal Self-Interpretation (T. DeCicco, M. Stroink), Independent-Interdependent Self-Interpretation (T. Singelis). Satisfactory psychometric characteristics have been obtained. Internal consistency (Cronbach's a - 0.663), and test-retest reliability (r = 0.576, p =.008) are satisfactory. Interpretable significant correlations between Analytic-Holistic Scale and other scales under study have been revealed, thus confirming the Scale's validity. The results indicate that Analytic-Holistic Scale can be used for analytic-holistic thinking study in Russian culture.
Keywords
analytic–holistic thinking, cultural peculiarities, psychometrics.
Number of purchasers
4
Views
759
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Abul'khanova K.A. Rossi jsk i j men ta l i tet: kross-kul'turnyj i tipologicheskij podkhody // Rossijskij mentalitet: voprosy psikhologicheskoj teorii i praktiki / Pod red. K.A. Abul'khanovoj, A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volovikovoj. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 1997.
  2. Apanovich V.V., Moroz O.S., Bezdenezhnykh B.N., Aleksandrov Yu.I. Analitichnost'–kholistichnost' myshleniya u  predstavitelej raznykh sotsial'nykh sloev rossijskogo obschestva // Estestvenno-nauchnyj podkhod v  sovremennoj psikhologii / Otv. red. V.A. Barabanschikov. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014.
  3. Apanovich V.V., Bezdenezhnykh B.N., Znakov V.V., Sams M., Yaaskelajnen I., Aleksandrov Yu.I. Razlichiya mozgovogo obespecheniya individual'nogo, kooperativnogo i konkurentnogo povedeniya u sub'ektov s analiticheskim i kholisticheskim kognitivnymi stilyami // Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2016. T. 9. № 2. S. 5–22.
  4. Aleksandrov Yu.I., Kirdina S.G. Tipy mental'nosti i institutsional'nye matritsy: mul'tidistsiplinarnyj podkhod // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. T. 38. S. 3–12.
  5. Voznesenskaya E.D., Konstantinovskij D.L., Cherednichenko G.A. “Konchit' kurs i  mesto dostat'”: Issledovanie vtorichnoj zanyatosti studentov // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2001. № 3. S. 101–120.
  6. Bergson A. Tvorcheskaya ehvolyutsiya (1907) / Per s fr. V.A. Flerovoj. M.: KANON-press, Kuchkovo pole, 1998.
  7. Brushlinskij A.V. Menta l'nost' rossijskaya i  regional'naya (provintsial'naya) // Rossijskij mentalitet: voprosy psikhologicheskoj teorii i  praktiki / Pod red. K.A. Abul'khanovoj, A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volovikovoj. M.: Izdvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 1997.
  8. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya: problemy i perspektivy. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2005.
  9. Znakov V.V. Tri traditsii psikhologicheskikh issledovanij – tri tipa ponimaniya // Voprosy psikhologii. 2009. № 4. S. 14–23.
  10. Znakov V.V. Analitichnost' i  kholistichnost' vo vzglyadakh A.V. Brushlinskogo i O.K. Tikhomirova // Voprosy psikhologii. 2013. № 4. S. 135–146.
  11. Znakov V.V. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya psikhologii ponimaniya mnogomernogo mira cheloveka // Voprosy psikhologii. 2014. № 4. S. 16–29.
  12. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
  13. Zubok Yu.A., Chuprov V.I. Molodye spetsialisty: problema podgotovki i polozhenie na rynke truda // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 5. S. 114–122.
  14. Kaneman D. Dumaj medlenno… reshaj bystro. M.: ASR, 2014.
  15. Kaptsov A.V., Kolesnikova E.I. Tipologicheskie osobennosti studentov s analiticheskim i kholisticheskim stilyami myshleniya // Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2014. № 2 (16). S. 41–56.
  16. Kaptsov A.V., Nekrasova E.V. Osobennosti tsennostej podrostkov s  analiticheskim i  kholisticheskim stilyami myshleniya // Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Seriya: Psikhologiya. 2014. № 1 (15). S. 121–132.
  17. Kirdina S.G. X i Y ehkonomiki: institutsional'nyj analiz. M.: Nauka, 2004.
  18. Klajn P. Vvedenie v psikhometricheskoe programmirovanie: Spravochnoe rukovodstvo po konstruirovaniyu testov. Kiev: PAN Ltd., 1994.
  19. Kornilova T.V. Perspektivy dinamicheskoj paradigmy v psikhologii vybora // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. T. 7. № 36. URL: http://psystudy. ru/index.php/num/2014v7n36/1013-kornilova36.html (data obrascheniya 16.05.2017).
  20. Kornilova T.V. Printsip neopredelennosti v psikhologii vybora i riska // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. T. 8. № 40. S. 3. URL: http://psystudy. ru/index.php/num/2015v8n40/1111-kornilova40.html (data obrascheniya: 16.05.2017).
  21. Kornilova T.V., Razvalyaeva A.Yu. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnogo varianta polnogo oprosnika S. Ehpstajna “Ratsional'nyj–Opytnyj” (Rational– Experiental Inventory) // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2017. T. 38. № 3. S. 92–107.
  22. Nisbett R., Peng K., Choj I., Norenzayan A. Kul'tury i sistemy myshleniya: sravnenie kholisticheskogo i  analiticheskogo poznaniya / Per. s  angl. M.S. Zhamkoch'yan; pod red. V.S. Maguna // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2011. T. 32. № 1. S. 55–86.
  23. Tuchina O.R. Fenomen samointerpretatsii lichnosti, tipy i izmerenie samointerpretatsii // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanij. Pyatigorsk, 2011. № 7. S. 183–193.
  24. Tuchina O.R. Metalichnostnaya samointerpretatsiya: kontseptsiya i  ee izmerenie // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. Severo-Kavkazskij region. Obschestvennye nauki. 2012. № 1. S. 91–95.
  25. Khofstede G., Makkrehj R.R. Vozvraschayas' k obsuzhdeniyu lichnosti i kul'tury: svyaz' lichnostnykh chert i kul'turnykh osej // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2010. № 4.
  26. Yurevich A.V. Psikhologiya sotsial'nykh yavlenij. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2014.
  27. Bruner J. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press, 1986.
  28. Buchtel E.E., Norenzayan A. Thinking across cultures: implications for dual processes / (Eds.) J. Evans, K. Frankish. In two minds: dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 217–238.
  29. Choi I., Koo M., Choi J. Individual differences in Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking // Personality and Social Psychiligy Bulletin. 2007. V. 33. № 5. P. 691–705.
  30. Choi I., Nisbett R.E. Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and in the actorobserver bias // Personality and social psychology bulletin, 1998. 24. P. 949–960.
  31. Choi I., Nisbett R. Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2000. V. 79(6). P. 890–905.
  32. De Cicco T., Stroink M. A third model of self-construal: the metapersonal self // International journal of transpersonal studies. 2007. № 26. P. 82–104.
  33. Evans J. The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation // Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006. 13(3). P. 378–395.
  34. Evans J. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition // Annual review of psychology. 2008. V. 59. P. 255–278.
  35. Epstein S. An integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic uncounscious // American psychologist. 1994. V. 49. P. 709–724.
  36. Epstein S., Pacini R., Denes-Raj V., Heier H. Individual differences in intuitive-experential and analytic-rational thinking styles // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1996. V. 71. № 2. P. 390–405.
  37. Grossman I., Varnum M. Social class, culture, and cognition // Social psychological and personality science. 2010.
  38. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world // Behavioral and brain sciences. 2010. V. 33. P. 61–135.
  39. Jääskeläinen I.P., Kauppila M., Apanovich V.V., BachaTrams M., Glerean E., Ryyppö E., Sams M., Alexandrov Yu.I. Differences in inter-subject correlations of hemodynamic activity during viewing of a drama movie between subjects with holistic vs. analytic cognitive styles // 10th FENS Forum of Neuroscience. July 2–6, 2016. Copenhagen, Denmark.
  40. Ji L.J., Nisbett R.E., Su Y. Culture, change, and prediction // Psychological science. 2001. V. 12. № 6. P. 450–456.
  41. Kirdina S. Institutions and the importance of social control in a nation’s development // Journal of economic issues. 2014. V. XLVII. № 2. P. 323–330.
  42. Kitayama S., Duffy S., Kawamura T., Larsen J.T. Perceiving an object and it’s context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look // Psychological science. 2003. V. 14. № 3. P. 201–206.
  43. Konrath S., Bushman B.J., Grove T. Seeing my world in a million little pieces: narcissism, self-construal, and cognitive–perceptual style // Journal of personality. 2009. V. 77. № 4. P. 1197–1228.
  44. Lechuga J, Santos B.M., Garza-Caballero A.A., Villarreal R. Holistic reasoning on the other side of the world: validation of the analysis-holism scale in Mexicans // Cultural diversity and ethnic minority psychology. 2011. V. 17. № 3. P. 325.
  45. Liang B., Cherian J. American and Chinese thinking styles: attitude effects on holistic and attribute ads // Organization and markets in emerging economies/ 2014. V. 5. № 1(9). P. 74–89.
  46. Ma-Kellams C., Blascovich J. Enjoying life in the face of death: East–West differences in responses to mortality salience // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2012. V. 103. № 5. P. 773.
  47. Monga A.B., John D.R. When does negative brand publicity hurt? The moderating influence of analytic versus holistic thinking // Journal of consumer psychology. 2008. V. 18. № 4. P. 320–332.
  48. Monga A.B., John D.R. What makes brands elastic? The influence of brand concept and styles of thinking on brand extension evaluation // Journal of marketing. 2010. V. 74. № 3. P. 80–92.
  49. Na J., Grossmann I., Varnum M., Kitayama S., Gonzalez R., Nisbett R. Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences // PNAS. 2010. V. 107. № 14. P. 6192–6197.
  50. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception // Cognitive psychology. 1977. V. 9. № 3. P. 353–383.
  51. Nisbett R. The Geography of thought. N.Y.: Free Press, 2003.
  52. Nisbett R.E., Masuda T. Culture and point of view // PNAS. 2003. V. 100. № 19. P. 11163–11170.
  53. Nisbett R.E., Peng K., Choi I., & Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological review. 2001. 108, 291–310.
  54. Norenzayan A., Lee A. It was meant to happen: explaining cultural variations in fate attributions // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2010. V. 98. № 5. P. 702.
  55. Norenzayan A., Nisbett R. Culture and causal cognition // Current directions in psychological science. 2000. V. 9. № 4. P. 132–135.
  56. Norenzayan A., Smith E., Kim B., Nisbett R. Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning // Cognitive science, 2002. V. 26.
  57. Norris P., Epstein S. An experiential thinking style: it’s facets and relation with objective and subjective criterion measures // Journal of personality. 2011. V. 79. № 5. P. 1043–1080.
  58. Pacini R., Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiental information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs and the ratio-bias phenomenon // Journ. of personality and social psychology. 1999. V. 76. № 6. P. 972–987.
  59. Peng K., Nisbett R.E. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction // American psychologist. 1999. 54. P. 741–754.
  60. Spencer-Rodgers J., Williams M., Peng K. Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: a decade of empirial research // Personality and social psychology review 2010. 14(3). P. 296–312.
  61. Stanovich K.E. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Elrbaum, 1999.
  62. Talhem T., Zhang X., Oishi S., Shimin C., Duan D., Lan X., Kitayama S. Large-Scale Psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture // Science. 2014. V. 344. P. 603–608.
  63. Zhang L.F. Thinking styles and modes of thinking: implications for education and research // The Journal of psychology. 2002. V. 136. № 3. P. 245–261.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate