PSYCHOLOGY ON THE BRINK OF TECHNOLOGICAL SINGULARITY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
PSYCHOLOGY ON THE BRINK OF TECHNOLOGICAL SINGULARITY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000378-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A.S. Sergeeva 
Occupation: Assistant professor, faculty of Technological Management and Innovations department
Affiliation: Technological Management and Innovations department of Social Sciences and Humanities Russia
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
F. Sergeev
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: St. Petersburg state University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Abstract
The paper devoted to the key questions from the article by A. L. Zhuravlev, T. A. Nestik and A. V. Yurevich devoted the future of psychological science and practice in Russia and worldwide till the year 2030. We focused on the potential problems with the accuracy of long-term prognosis associated with the nonlinear nature of technological evolution of human civilization, close to the "technological singularity". We discuss a disciplinary and transdisciplinary evolution of psychology, its borderlines and content changing, which depends on the stage of development of society and technology.
Keywords
development forecast, self-organization, technological singularity, artificial environment evolution
Number of purchasers
4
Views
511
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Golikov Yu. Ya. Psikhologicheskie problemy konvergentnykh tekhnologij // Aktual'nye problemy psikhologii truda, inzhenernoj psikhologii i ehrgonomiki. Vyp. 6. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014. S. 13‒31.
  2. Zhuravlev A. L., Nestik T. A., Yurevich A. V. Prognoz razvitiya psikhologicheskoj nauki i praktiki k 2030 g. // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2016. T. 37. № 5. S. 55‒74.
  3. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov D.V., Nestik T.A., Podd'yakov A.N., Yurevich A.V. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya znaniya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
  4. Nazaretyan A. P. Seredina XXI veka: zagadka singulyarnosti // Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk. 2015. T. 84. № 3. S. 275‒277.
  5. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A. L. Obmen znaniyami, gruppovaya refleksivnost' i  korporativnaya pamyat' kak ob'ekty sotsial'noj psikhologii // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2010. T. 31. № 3. S. 5–16.
  6. Panov A. D. Zavershenie planetarnogo tsikla ehvolyutsii? // Filosofskie nauki. 2005. № 3‒4. S. 42– 49; 31–50.
  7. Panov A. D. Tekhnologicheskaya singulyarnost', teorema Penrouza ob iskusstvennom intellekte i kvantovaya priroda soznaniya // Metafizika.2013. № 3 (9). S. 141‒188.
  8. Rossiya v globaliziruyuschemsya mire: mirovozzrencheskie i  sotsiokul'turnye aspekty / Otv. red. V.S. Stepin. M.: Nauka, 2007.
  9. Sergeev S. F. Psikhologicheskie aspekty problemy interfejsa v tekhnogennom mire // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 5. S. 88–98.
  10. Sergeev S. F. Ehrgonomika i  inzhenernaya psikhologiya tekhnogennogo mira: voprosy metodologii, teorii i  praktiki // Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya psikhologii truda i  organizatsionnoj psikhologii. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2015. S. 47–56.
  11. Stepin V. S. Tsivilizatsiya i  kul'tura. SPb.: SPbGUP, 2011.
  12. Kurzwell R. The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking Penguin, New York, 2005.
  13. Sergeev S. F. Humans within the Framework of Technobiotics Evolution // European Journal of Psychological Studies. 2014. Vol. 3. № 3. P. 93‒101. (In Russian)
  14. Snooks G. D. Whyishistorygettingfaster? Measurementandexplanation // Filosofskie nauki. 2005. № 4. S. 51‒68.
  15. Vinge V. The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era. San Diego, 1993.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate