Везде
EXECUTIVE CONTROL AND INTUITION: INTERACTION AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF CREATIVE DECISION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
EXECUTIVE CONTROL AND INTUITION: INTERACTION AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF CREATIVE DECISION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000392-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
ILYA VLADIMIROV  Lebed' A.A. ALEXANDRA CHISTOPOLSKAYA ANNA SAVINOVA S. Korovkin
Abstract
Ccording to Ya.A. Ponomarev hypothesis, creative problem solving proceeds several consequent stages from well-controlled and conscious algorithm-like processes to unconscious, intuitive processes. One of the key issues that can be discussed within the current hypothesis development is the question of executive control role at each stage of the solution, including the intuitive level. Current article contains the review of several experimental investigations of the creative problem solving processes via the cognitive monitoring method applying the probe-task during problem solving process. The possibility of using the probe-task error dynamics for evaluation of executive control role in creative or insight problem solving is discussed. Non-similar role of executive control in creative and algorithmized problem solving is shown, providing arguments in favor of the specificity of creative problem solving processes point of view. The fact of executive control inclusion into creative problem solving at each stage of the solution is demonstrated.
Keywords
Thinking, problem solving, intuition, executive control, creativity, insight, probe-task
Date of publication
01.01.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
583
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Brushlinskij A.V. Myshlenie i prognozirovanie. M.: Mysl', 1979.
    2. 

  2. Vladimirov I.Yu., Korovkin S.Yu. Rabochaya pamyat' kak sistema, obsluzhivayuschaya myslitel'nyj protsess // Kognitivnaya psikhologiya: fenomeny i problemy. M.: Lenand, 2014. S. 8-21.
    3. 

  3. Dunker K. Psikhologiya produktivnogo (tvorcheskogo) myshleniya // Psikhologiya myshleniya. M.: Progress, 1965. S.86-234.
    4. 

  4. Keler V. Issledovanie intellekta chelovekopodobnykh obez'yan. M.: Izdatel'stvo kommunisticheskoj Akademii, 1930.
    5. 

  5. Korovkin S.Yu., Vladimirov I.Yu., Savinova A.D. Dinamika zagruzki rabochej pamyati pri reshenii insajtnykh zadach // Rossijskij zhurnal kognitivnoj nauki. 2014. № 4. S. 67-81.
    6. 

  6. Lakatos I. Metodologiya nauchnykh issledovatel'skikh programm // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. № 4. S.135-154.
    7. 

  7. Machinskaya R.I. Upravlyayuschie struktury mozga // Zhurn. vysshej nervnoj deyatel'nosti. 2015. T. 65. № 1. S. 33-60.
    8. 

  8. N'yuehll A., Shou Dzh.K., Sajmon G.A. Protsessy tvorcheskogo myshleniya // Psikhologiya myshleniya. M.: Progress, 1965. S. 500-530.
    9. 

  9. Ponomarev Ya.A. O ponyatii "psikhologicheskij mekhanizm resheniya tvorcheskikh zadach" // Psikhol. zhurn. 1996. T. 17. № 6. S. 19-29.
    10. 

  10. Ponomarev Ya.A. Psikhologiya tvoreniya. M.: Moskovskij psikhologo-sotsial'nyj institut; Voronezh: NPO “MODEhK”, 1999.
    11. 

  11. Ponomarev Ya.A. Psikhologiya tvorchestva. M.: Nauka, 1976.
    12. 

  12. Rubinshtejn S.L. O myshlenii i putyakh ego issledovaniya. M.: Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1958.  
    13. 

  13. Spiridonov V.F. Psikhologiya myshleniya: reshenie zadach i problem. M.: Genezis, 2006.
    14. 

  14. Tikhomirov O.K. Struktura myslitel'noj deyatel'nosti cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1969.
    15. 

  15. Ansburg P.I., Hill K. Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources // Personality and Individual Differences. 2003. Vol. 34. P. 11411152.
    16. 

  16. Ash I.K., Wiley J. The nature ofrestructuring in insight: An individual differences approach // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2006. Vol. 13. P. 66-73.
    17. 

  17. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G.J. Working memory// The psychology of learning and motivation / Ed. Bower G.H. NY: Academic Press, 1974. Vol. 8. P. 47-89.
    18. 

  18. Fleck J.I. Working memory demands in insight versus analytic problem solving // European Journ. of Cognitive Psychology. 2008. Vol. 20. P. 139-176.
    19. 

  19. Hambrick D.Z., Engle R.W. The role of working memory in problem solving // The Psychology of Problem Solving / Eds. Davidson J.E., Sternberg R.J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. P. 176-206.
    20. 

  20. Jarosz A.F., Colflesh G.J.H., Wiley J. The effects of alcohol use on creative problem solving // Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society / Eds. S. Ohlsson, R. Catrambone. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 2010. P. 563.
    21. 

  21. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1973.
    22. 

  22. Kaplan C.A., Simon H.A. In search of insight // Cognitive Psychology. 1990. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 374-419.
    23. 

  23. Knoblich G., Ohlsson S., Haider H., Rhenius D. Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1999. Vol. 25. № 6. P. 1534-1555.
    24. 

  24. Kounios J., Beeman M. The Aha! Moment: The Cognitive Neuroscience of Insight // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009. Vol. 18. P. 210-216.
    25. 

  25. Lavric A., Forstmeier S., Rippon G. Differences in working memory involvement in analytical and creative tasks: An ERP study // Cognitive Neuroscience. 2000. Vol. 11. P. 1613-1618.
    26. 

  26. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception // Cognitive Psychology. 1977. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 353-383.
    27. 

  27. Ormerod T.C., MacGregor J.N., Chronicle E.P. Dynamics and constraints in insight problem solving // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2002. Vol. 28. № 4. P. 791-799.
    28. 

  28. Peirce J.W. PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python // Journ. of Neuroscience Methods. 2007. Vol. 162. № 1-2. P. 8-13.
    29. 

  29. Reber P.J., Kotovsky K. Implicit Learning in Problem Solving: the Role of Working Memory Capacity // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: General. 1997. Vol. 126. № 2. P. 178-203.
    30. 

  30. Reverberi C., Toraldo A., D'Agostini S., Skrap M. Better without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients // Brain. 2005. Vol. 128. P. 2882-2890.
    31. 

  31. Ricks T.R., Turley-Ames K., Wiley J. Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge // Memory and Cognition. 2007. Vol. 35. P. 1456-1462.
    32. 

  32. Robbins T.W., Anderson E.J., Barker D.R., Bradley A.C., Fearnyhough C., Henson R., Hudson S.R., Baddeley A.D. Working memory in chess // Memory and Cognition. 1996. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 83-93.
    33. 

  33. Weisberg R.W., Alba J.W. An examination of the alleged role of "fixation" in the solution of "insight" problems // Journ. of Experimental Psychology: General. 1981. Vol. 110. № 2. P. 169-192.
    34.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate