Везде
EVOLUTIONAL APPROACH TO FACE PERCEPTION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
EVOLUTIONAL APPROACH TO FACE PERCEPTION
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000596-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
E. NIKITINA 
Abstract
Trends in psychological researches devoted to the problem of face perception by different kinds of animals as a source of subjective significant information are discussed. Broaden interpretation of term "face" that makes it possible to use it for not only man or primates, but for other animals including invertebrates as well is proposed. Application of evolutional approach to researches on face perception is based. Original methodological approaches and new findings on perception of face as an "organ" of social interaction, sign of individual differentiation, and source of situational cognitive and emotionally significant information are presented. Faces are shown to be significant objects for many animals. It is argued that high significance of visual information channel and importance of social interactions are premises for the development of ability for faces' discrimination, categorization and remembering. The results of researches on specific neuronal and behavioral responses of representatives of several kinds of animals to the face as a specific type of visual stimuli are presented. Increase in local activity of homo-logical regions of brain when other individuals are recognized or in response to their emotional sate in man, primates and in sheep too is confirmed. Similar perceptual phenomena such as inversion effect, effect of "own race", etc. are marked.
Keywords
Perception of faces, visual stimulus, individual differentiation, categorization, perception of emotions, perceptual phenomena, social interactions, communication of animals with man, direction of a look, brain specialization, adaptation, evolution, phylogenies
Date of publication
03.07.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
458
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Aleksandrov Yu.I., Aleksandrova N.L. Sub'ektivnyj opyt, kul'tura i sotsial'nye predstavleniya. M.: Izd-vo "Institut psikhologii RAN", 2009.
    2. 

  2. Aleksandrov Yu.I., Sergienko E.A. Psikhologicheskoe i fiziologicheskoe: kontinual'nost' i/ili diskretnost'? // Psikhol. zhurn. 2003. T. 24. № 6. S.98-109.
    3. 

  3. Gardner M. Ehtot pravyj levyj mir. M.: Mir, 1967.
    4. 

  4. Kruchenkova E.P. Materinskoe povedenie mlekopitayuschikh. M.: KRASAND, 2009.
    5. 

  5. Sergienko E.A. Antitsipatsiya v rannem ontogeneze cheloveka. M.: Nauka, 1992.
    6. 

  6. Tomasello M. Istoki chelovecheskogo obscheniya. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2011.
    7. 

  7. Firsov L.A. Povedenie antropoidov v prirodnykh usloviyakh. M.: KRASAND, 2010.
    8. 

  8. von Bayern A.M.P., Emery N.J. Jackdaws respond to human attentional states and communicative cues in different contexts // Current biology. 2009. V. 19. Is. 7. P. 602-606.
    9. 

  9. Bushnell I.W.R., Sal F., Mulhn J.T. Neonatal recognition of the mother's face // Brit. Journ. of Developmental Psychology. 1989. V. 7. P. 3-15.
    10. 

  10. Carter J., Lyons N.J., Cole H.L., Goldsmith A.R. Subtle cues of predation risk: starlings respond to a predator's direction of eye-gaze // Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2008. V. 275. P. 1709-1715.
    11. 

  11. Coulon M., Deputte B.L., Heyman Y., Baudoin C. Individual recognition in domestic cattle (Bos taurus): Evidence from 2D-images of heads from different breeds // PLoS ONE. 2009. V. 4. e4441
    12. 

  12. Delfour F., Marten K. Mirror image processing in three marine mammal species: killer whales (Orcinus orca), false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) and California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) // Behav. Processes. 2001. V. 53. Issue 3. P. 181-190.
    13. 

  13. Ferrari P.F., Kohler E., Fogassi L., Gallese V. The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys // PNAS. 2000. V. 97. No. 25. P. 13997-14002.
    14. 

  14. Ferrari P.F., Visalberghi E., Paukner A., Fogassi L., Ruggiero A. et al. Neonatal imitation in rhesus macaques // PLoS Biology. 2006. V. 4(9). e302. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC1560174/pdf/pbio.0040302.pdf.
    15. 

  15. Gdcsi M., Miklosi A., Varga O., Topdl J., Csdnyi V. Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human's attention // Animal Cognition. 2004. V. 7(3). P. 144-153.
    16. 

  16. Gieling E.T., Musschenga M.A., Nordquist R.E., van der Staay F.J. Juvenile pigs use simple geometric 2D shapes but not portrait photographs of conspecifics as visual discriminative stimuli // Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2012. V. 142. P. 142-153.
    17. 

  17. Hains S.M.J., Muir D.W. Infant sensitivity to adult eye direction // Child Development. 1996. V. 67. P. 1940-1951.
    18. 

  18. Hampton R.R. Sensitivity to information specifying the line of gaze of humans in sparrows // Behaviour. 1994. V. 130. P. 41-51.
    19. 

  19. Hauser M. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Ecco. 2006.
    20. 

  20. Hoffman E.A., Haxby J.V. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception // Nature Neuroscience. 2000. V. 3(1). P. 80-84.
    21. 

  21. Kano F., Tanaka M., Tomonaga M. Enhanced recognition of emotional stimuli in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) // Animal Cognition. 2008. V. 11. P. 517-524.
    22. 

  22. Kendrick K. Intelligent perception // Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 1998. V. 57. P. 213-231.
    23. 

  23. Kendrick K.M., Atkins K., Hinton M.R., Heavens P., Keverne B. Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and object discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity // Behavioural processes. 1996. V. 38. P. 19-35.
    24. 

  24. Kendrick K.M., da Costa A.P., Hinton M.R., Leigh A.E., Peirce J.W. Sheep don't forget a face // Nature. 2001. V. 414. P. 165-166.
    25. 

  25. Kobayashy H., Kohshima S. Unique morphology of the human eye // Nature. 1997. V. 387. P. 767-768.
    26. 

  26. Kuwahata H., Adachi I., Fujita K., Tomonaga M., Matsuzawa T. Development of schematic face preference in macaque monkeys // Behav. Processes. 2004. V. 66. P. 17-21.
    27. 

  27. Lee W.Y., Lee S., Chun Choe J., Jablonski P.G. Wild birds recognize individual humans: experiments on magpies, Pica pica // Animal cognition. 2011. V. 14 (6). P. 817-825.
    28. 

  28. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G.A. Comparative View of Face Perception // Journ. of Comparative Psychology. 2010. V. 124. P. 233-251.
    29. 

  29. Levey D.J., Londono G.A., Ungvari-Martin J., Hiersoux M.R., Jankowski J.E., Poulsen J.R., Stra-ce Ch.M., Robinson S.K. Urban mockingbirds quickly learn to identify individual humans // Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 2009. V. 106(22). P. 8959-8962.
    30. 

  30. Marzluff J.M., Walls J., Cornell H.N., Withey J.C., Craig D.P. Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows // Animal Behaviour. 2010. V. 79. P. 699-707.
    31. 

  31. McNeil D. The Face: A Natural History / Publisher: Back Bay Books, 2000.
    32. 

  32. Meltzoff A.N., Moore M.K. Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates // Science. 1977. V. 198. P. 75-78.
    33. 

  33. Mondloch C.J., Lewis T.L., Budreau D.R., Maurer D., Dannemiller J.L., Stephens B.R., Kleiner-Gathercoal K.A. Face perception during early infancy // Psychological Science. 1999. V.10. P. 419-422.
    34. 

  34. Mongillo P., Bono G., Regolin L. Selective attention to humans in companion dogs, Canis familiaris // Animal Behaviour. 2010. V. 80. P. 1057-1063.
    35. 

  35. Myowa-Yamakoshi M., Tomonaga M. Development of face recognition in an infant gibbon (Hylobates agilis) // Infant Behavior & Development. 2001. V. 24. P. 215-227.
    36. 

  36. Myowa-Yamakoshi M., Tomonaga M., Tanaka M., Matsuzawa T. Imitation in neonatal chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) // Developmental Science. 2004. V. 7(4). P. 437-442.          
    37. 

  37. Myowa-Yamakoshi M., Yamaguchi M.K., Tomonaga M., Tanaka M., Matsuzawa T. Development of face recognition in infant chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes) // Cognitive development. 2005. V. 20. No. 1. P. 49-63.
    38. 

  38. Pack A.A., Herman L.M. Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task // Journ. of Comparative Psychology. 2004. V. 118. P. 160-171.
    39. 

  39. Pack A.A., Herman L.M. The dolphin's (Tursiops trun-catus) understanding of human gazing and pointing: Knowing what and where // Journ. of Comparative Psychology. 2007. V. 121. P. 34-45.
    40. 

  40. Parr L.A. The discrimination of faces and their emotional content by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) // Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2003. V. 1000. P. 56-78.
    41. 

  41. Parr L.A., Hecht E., Barks S.K., Preuss T.M., Votaw J.R. Face processing in the chimpanzee brain // Current Biology. 2009. V. 19. P. 50-53.
    42. 

  42. Pascalis O., de Schonen S., Morton J., Deruelle C., Fabre-Grenet M. Mother's Face Recognition by Neonates: A Replication and an Extension // Infant behavior and development. 1995. V. 18. P. 79-85.
    43. 

  43. Peirce J.W., Leigh A.E., da Costa A.P.C., Kendrick K.M. Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage // Behavioural Processes. 2001. V. 55. P. 13-26.
    44. 

  44. Phelps M.T., Roberts W.A. Memory for pictures of upright and inverted faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) and pigeons (Columba livia) // Journ. of Comparative Psychology. 1994. V. 108. P. 114-125.
    45. 

  45. Pokorny J. J., Webb C.E., de Waal F.B.M. An inversion effect modified by expertise in capuchin monkeys // Animal Cognition. 2011. V. 14(6). P. 839-846.
    46. 

  46. Proops L., Walton M., McComb K. The use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus) during an object choice task // Animal Behaviour. 2010. V. 79. P. 1205-1209.
    47. 

  47. Proops L., Rayner J., Taylor A.M., McComb K. The Responses of Young Domestic Horses to Human-Given Cues // PLoS One. 2013. Jun 19. 8(6). e67000. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC3686775
    48. 

  48. Racca A., Guo K., Meints K., Mills D.S. Reading faces: differential lateral gaze bias in processing canine and human facial expressions in dogs and 4-year-old children // PLoS One. 2012. V. 7 (4). E36076. URL: http://www.plosone.org/article/ info:doi/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036076
    49. 

  49. Rybarczyk P., Kobe Y., Rushen J., Tanida H., de Passille A.M. Can cows recognize people by their faces? // Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2001. V. 74. P. 175-189.
    50. 

  50. Salva O.R., Farroni T., Regolin L., Vallortigara G., Johnson M.H. The evolution of social orienting: evidence from chicks (Gallus gallus) and human newborns // PLOS One. 2011. V. 6. No. 4. E18802.
    51. 

  51. Sheehan M.J., Tibbetts E.A. Robust long-term social memories in a paper wasp // Current Biology. 2008. V.
    52. 

  52. P. R851-R852.
    53. 

  53. Siemionow M., Sonmez E. Face as an organ // Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2008. V. 61(3). P. 345-352.
    54. 

  54. Soproni K., Miklosi A., Topal J., Csanyi V. Comprehension of Human Communicative Signs in Pet Dogs (Canis familiaris) // Journ. of Comparative Psychology. 2001. V. 115. No. 2. P. 122-126.
    55. 

  55. Sousa G.S., Gomes B.D., Silveira L.C.L. Comparative neurophysiology of spatial luminance contrast sensitivity // Psychology and neuroscience (online). 2011. V. 4. No. 1. URL: http://www.scielo.br/scielo. php?pid=S1983-32882011000100005&script =sci_ arttext)
    56. 

  56. Sreekar R., Quader S. Influence of gaze and directness of approach on the escape responses of the Indian rock lizard, Psammophilus dorsalis (Gray, 1831) // Journ. of Biosciences. 2013. V. 38. P. 829-833.
    57. 

  57. Sugita Y. Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces // PNAS. 2008. V. 105. P. 394-398.
    58. 

  58. Tate A.J., Fischer H., Leigh A.E., Kendrick K.M. Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for face identity and face emotion processing in animals // Philosophical transactions of the royal society. B. 2006. V. 361. P. 2155-2172.
    59. 

  59. Tibbetts E.A., Dale J. Individual recognition: it is good to be different // Trends in ecology and evolution. 2007. V. 22. P. 529-537.
    60. 

  60. Tomasello M., Call J., Hare B. Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics // Animal Behaviour 1998. V. 55. P. 1063-1069.
    61. 

  61. de Waal F.B.M. What is an animal emotion? // Annals of New York Academy of Sciences. 2011. V. 1224. P. 191-206.
    62. 

  62. Weiss D.J., Kralik J., Hauser M.D. Face processing in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) // Animal Cognition. 2001. V. 4. P. 191-205.
    63. 

  63. Wilkinson A., Mandl I., Bugnyar T., Huber L. Gaze following in the red-footed tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria) // Animal Cognition. 2010. V. 13. P. 765769.
    64.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate