SELF-ESTIMATE OF MEN'S INTELLECTUAL-PERSONAL POTENTIAL STRUKTURE
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
SELF-ESTIMATE OF MEN'S INTELLECTUAL-PERSONAL POTENTIAL STRUKTURE
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000616-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
Conception of subjective estimation of intelligence (SEI) as a latent variable is based in theoretical-and-empirical study. The role of SEI as a mediator for "objective" measurement of intelligence is specified as an effect of seven procedures with nine fixed variables testing in students' sample (n=332). These measurements are presented by the results of intelligence testing and external assessments of other people as well as by variables characterizing personal peculiarities of ambiguity acceptance. Structural model enriching the notion about "unity of intellect and affect" and characterizing SEI as a manifestation of unity of functioning of men's intellectual-personal potential is verified.
Keywords
self-estimate of intelligence, intelligence measurement, tolerance to ambiguity, risk readiness, self-concept, self-understanding, self-relation, implicit theories, intuition.
Date of publication
01.03.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
611
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials


  1. Berne R. Razvitie Ya-kontseptsii i vospitanie. M.: Progress, 1986.
  2. Borozdina L.V., Kubantseva S.R. Pokazateli intellekta i neverbal'noj kreativnosti pri sootvetstvii i nesootvetstvii urovnej samootsenki i prityazanij // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 2006. № 4. S. 41-51.
  3. Dvek K.S. Novaya psikhologiya uspekha. Dumaj i pobezhdaj. Khar'kov: Knizhnyj klub, 2007.
  4. Znakov V.V. Samoponimanie sub'ekta kak kognitivnaya i ehkzistentsial'naya problema // Psikhol. zhurn. 2005. T. 26. №1. S. 18-25.
  5. Kornilov S.A., Grigorenko E.L. Metodicheskij kompleks dlya diagnostiki akademicheskikh, tvorcheskikh i prakticheskikh sposobnostej // Psikhol. zhurn. 2010. T.31. №2. S. 90-103.
  6. Kornilova T.V. Novyj oprosnik tolerantnosti-intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti // Psikhol. zhurn. 2010. T. 31. №1. S. 74-86.
  7. Kornilova T.V. Psikhologiya riska i prinyatiya reshenij. M.: Aspekt Press, 2003.
  8. Kornilova T.V., Shuranova O.I. Korrelyatsionnye issledovaniya: puti priblizheniya k prichinnomu analizu // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 1987. № 4. S. 58-69.
  9. Molchanova O.N. Samootsenka: stabil'nost' ili izmenchivost'? // Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2006. T. 3. № 2. S. 23-51.
  10. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psikhosemantiki. SPb.: Piter, 2005.                 
  11. Ruzhgis P. Kul'tura i intellekt: Krosskul'turnoe izuchenie implitsitnykh teorij intellekta // Voprosy psikhologii. 1994. №1. C. 142-147.
  12. Smirnov S.D. Modifitsirovannyj variant metodiki K. Dvek dlya otsenki tipov implitsitnykh teorij intellekta i lichnosti, prisuschikh studentam // Trudy SGU. Gumanitarnye nauki. Psikhologiya i sotsiologiya obrazovaniya. 2005. Vyp. 82. S. 40-55.
  13. Smirnov S.D., Kornilova T.V., Kornilov S.A., Malakhova S.I. O svyazi intellektual'nykh i lichnostnykh kharakteristik studentov s uspeshnost'yu ikh obucheniya // Vestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. № 4. 2007. S. 82-88.
  14. Smirnova N.L. Obraz umnogo cheloveka: rossijskoe issledovanie // Rossijskij mentalitet: voprosy psikhologicheskoj teorii i praktiki / Pod red. K.A. Abul'khanovoj, A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volovikovoj. M.: Izd-vo "In-t psikhologii RAN", 1997. S. 112-130.
  15. Stepanosova O.V., Kornilova T.V., Grigorenko E.L. Diagnostika doveriya intuitsii // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennoj nauki: sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Chasti 36-38. Psikhologiya, kul'turologiya, iskusstvovedenie. Trudy 5-j Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii molodykh uchenykh i studentov. 7-9 sentyabrya 2004, g. Samara: SamGTU, 2004. S. 56-58.
  16. Sternberg R., Forsajt Dzh. B., Khedland Dzh., Grigorenko E. Prakticheskij intellekt. SPb.: Piter, 2002.
  17. Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1983.
  18. Chesnokova I.I. Problema samosoznaniya v psikhologii. M.: Nauka, 1977.
  19. Belof H. Mother, father and me: our IQ // The Psychologist. 1992. V. 5. P. 309-311.
  20. Bentler P.M. EQS structural equations program manual. Inc, Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, 1995.
  21. Brunner M., Krauss S., Kunter M. Gender differences in mathematics: Does the story need to be rewritten? // Intelligence. 2008. V. 36. P. 403-421.
  22. Chamorro-Premuzic T., Arteche A. Intellectual competence and academic performance: Preliminary validation of a model // Intelligence. 2008. V. 36. P. 564-573.
  23. Chamorro-Premuzic T., Furnham A. Personality and self-assessed intelligence: Can gender and personality distort self-assessed intelligence // Educational Research and Reviews. 2006. V. 1 №7. P. 227-233.
  24. Chamorro-Premuzic T., Furnham A. Self-Assessed Intelligence and Academic Performance // Educational Psyhology. 2006. V. 26. №6. P. 769-779.
  25. Deary I.J., Dykiert D., Gale C.G. Are apparent sex differences in mean IQ scores created in part by sample restriction and increased male variance? // Intelligence. 2009. V. 37. P. 42-47.
  26. Dweck C.S. Self-Theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: The Psychology Press, 1999.
  27. Flugel J. An inquiry as to popular views on intelligence and related topics // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1947. V. 27. P. 140-152.
  28. Furnham A. Self-estimates of intelligence: culture and gender difference in self and other estimates of both general (g) and multiple intelligences // Personality and Individual Differences. 2001. V. 31. № 8. P. 503-517.
  29. Furnham A., Moutafi J., Chamorro-Premuzic T. Personality and Intelligence: Gender, The Big Five, Self-Estimated and Psychometric Intelligence // International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 2005. V. 13. № 1. P. 11-24.
  30. Furnham A.F. Lay Theories: Everyday Understanding of Problems in the Social Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon, 1988.
  31. Furnham A., Rawles R. Sex differences in the estimation of intelligence // Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1995. V. 10. P. 741-745.
  32. Furnham A., Rawles R. Correlations between self-estimated and psychometrically measured IQ // Journal of Social Psychology. 1995. № 139. P. 405410.
  33. Holling H., Preckel F. Self-estimates of intelligence -methodological approaches and gender differences // Personality and Individual Differences. 2005. V. 38. № 3. P. 503-517.
  34. Kornilova T.V., Kornilov S.A., Chumakova M.A. Subjective Evaluations of Intelligence and Academic Self-Concept Predict Academic Achievement: Evidence from a Selective Student Population // Learning and Individual Differences. 2009. V. 19. № 4. P. 596-608.
  35. Reber A.S., Reber E.S. The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology. London: Penguin, 2001.
  36. Reilly J., Mulhern G. Gender differences in self-estimated IQ: the need for care in interpreting group data // Personality and Individual Differences. 1995. V. 18. P. 189-192.
  37. Shipstone K., Burt S. Twenty-five years on: A replication of Flugel's (1947) work on lay popular views of intelligence and related topics // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1973. V. 56. P. 183-187.
  38. Sternberg R. Metaphors of mind: conceptions of the nature of intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  39. Sternberg R., Conway B., Ketron J., Bernstein M. People's conceptions of Intelligence // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1981. V. 41. P. 37-55.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate