References

Additional sources and materials

1. Bardin K.V., Indlin Yu.A. Nachala sub'ektnoj psikhofiziki. M.: IP RAN, 1993.
 2. Bardin K.V., Skotnikova I.G., Frishman E.Z. Sub'­ektivnyj podkhod v psikhofizike Ts Problemy dif­ ferentsial'noj psikhofiziki/Otv. red. K.V Baopin M.:IP AN SSSR, 1991. S. 4-17. ’
 3. Brushlinskij A.V., Polikarpov V.A. Myshlenie i obschenie. 2-e izd., dorab. Samara, 1996.
 4. Vajner I.V. Sub'ektivnaya uverennost' pri reshe­nii psikhofizicheskoj zadachi: Dis. ... kand. psikhol nauk. M.: IP AN SSSR, 1990.
 5. Vysotskij V.B. Lichnostnye i protsessual'nye us­ loviya formirovaniya uverennosti v pravil'nosti resheniya zadachi: Dis. ... kand. psikhol. nauk. M.: IP RAN, 2001.
 6. Link S. Volnovaya teoriya skhodstva i razlichiya. Dnepropetrovsk: DGU, 1995.
 7. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psikhologii. 2-e izd. M.: Nauka, 1999.
 8. Romek V.G. Ponyatie uverennosti v sebe v sovre­ mennoj sotsial'noj psikhologii // Psikhologiches­ kij vestnik. Rostov n/D: Izd-vo RGU, 1996. Vyp. 1. 4 .2 . S. 132-146.
 9. Romek V.G. Uverennost' v sebe kak sotsial'no-psi­ khologicheskaya kharakteristika lichnosti: Dis. ... kand. psikhol. nauk. Rostov n/D: Izd-vo RGU, 1997.
 10. Serebryakova E.A. Uverennost' v sebe i usloviya ee formirovaniya u shkol'nikov. M., 1955.
 11. Skotnikova I.G. Oshibki nablyudatelya v zadachakh porogovogo tipa v sootnoshenii s vremennymi kha­ rakteristikami i uverennost'yu - somnitel'­ nost'yu sensornogo obraza // Psikhicheskij obraz: stroenie, mekhanizmy, funktsionirovanie i razvi­ tie: II Mezhdunarodnye nauchnye Lomovskie chte­ niya. Tezisy dokladov. M.: IP RAN, 1994. T. 2. S. 82-84.
 12. Skotnikova I.G. Issledovaniya uverennosti-so­ mnitel'nosti v sensornom razlichenii // Ezhegod­ nik Rossijskogo psikhologicheskogo obschestva. Psikhologiya segodnya. M.: RPO, 1996. T. 2. Vyp. 3. S. 34-36.
 13. Skotnikova I.G. Psikhologiya sensornykh protses­ sov. Psikhofizika I Sovremennaya psikhologiya / Red. V.N. Druzhinin. M.: INFRA-M, 1999. S. 97-136.
 14. Skotnikova I.G. Otsenka uverennosti v raznykh vidakh zadach // Ezhegodnik RPO “Psikhologiya sozi­ daniya”. Kazan': KAI, 2000. S. 27-29.
 15. Baranski J.V., Petrusic W.M. The calibration and resolu­ tion of confidence in perceptual judgments // Perception and Psychophysics. 1994. V. 55. P. 412-428.
 16. Baranski J.V., Petrusic W.M. Probing the locus of confi­ dence judgments: experiments on the time to determine confidence // J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performace. 1998. V. 24. P. 929—945.
 17. Baransi J.V., Petrusic W.M. Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination // Perception and Psychophysics. 1999. V. 61. P. 1369-1383.
 18. Bjorkman M. Knowledge, calibration and resolution: a linear model // Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1992. V. 39. P. 365-383.
 19. Bjorkman M., Juslin P., Winman A. Realism of confi­dence in sensory discrimination: The underconfidence phenomenon H Perception and Psychophysics. 1993.
 V. 54. P. 75-81.
 20. Bjorkman M. Internal cue theory: calibration and resolu­ tion of confidence in general knowledge H Organization­ al Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1994.
 V. 58. P. 368-405.
 21. Crawford J., Stankov L. Age differences in the realism of confidence judjments: A calibration study using tests of fluid and crystallized intelligence // Learning and indi­ vidual differences. 1996. V. 6. P. 84—103.
 22. Dawes R. Confidence in intellectual judgments vs. con­ fidence in perceptual judments // Simularity and choice:papers in honour of Clyde Coombs / Eds. E. Lanterman,
 H. Feger. Bern: Huber, 1980. P. 327-345.
 23. Ferrel W.R. A model for realism of confidence judg­ments: implications of underconfidence in sensory dis­ crimination // Perception and Psychophysics. 1995.
 V. 57. P. 246-254.
 24. Galanter E. An axiomatic and experimental study of sensory order and measure // Psychological Review. 1956. V.63.P. 16—28.
 25. Gregson R.A.M. Confidence judgments for discrimina­tion in nonlinear psychophysics // Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences. 1999. V. 3. P. 31^48.
 26. Juslin P. The overconfidence phenomenon as a conse­ quence of informal experimenter-guided selection of al- manic items Ts Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1994. V. 39. P. 226-246.
 27. Juslin P., Ollson H. Thurstonian and Brunswikian ori­ gins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination // Psychological Review. 1997. V. 104. P. 344-366.
 28. Kahneman D., SlovicA., Tversky A. Judgment under un-
 certanty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
 29. Keren G. On the ability of monitoring non-veridical per­ ceptions and uncertain knowledge: Some calibrations studies II Acta Psychologica. 1988. V. 67. P. 95-119.
 30. Lichtenstein S., Fishoff B. Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The calibration of probability judgments // Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1977. V. 20. P. 159— 183.
 31. Lichtenstein S., Fishoff B., Phillips L. Calibration of
 probabilities: The state of the art to 1980 // Judgments under uncertanty: Heuristics and biases / Eds. D. Kahne­ man, P. Slovic, A. Tversky. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni­ versity Press, 1982. P. 306-334.
 32. Olsson H., Winman A. Underconfidence in sensory dis­ crimination: The interaction between experimental set­ ting and response strategies // Perception and Psychophysics. 1996. V. 58. P. 374-382.
 33. Petrusuc W.M., Baranski J. V. Context, feedback and the salibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments Ts American J. of Psychology. 1997 V 110 P. 543-572.
 34. Petrusic W.M., Baransi J.V. Effects of expressing confi­ dence in decision processing: implication for theories of RT and confidence // Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics / Ed. C. Bonnet. Strasbourg, 2000. P. 103-108.
 35. Ronis D.L., Yates J.F. Components of the probability judgment accuracy: individual consistency and effects of subject matter and assessment method // Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1987. V. 40. P. 193-218.
 36. Shendyapin V.M. Neural network model as a possible in­ strument for confidence simulation in sensory judg­ ments I I Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Leipzing, 2001.
 37. Skotnikova LG. I. Accuracy, confidence-unconfidence and response times in unordered discrimination: subject- oriented research. II. Confidence judgments specificity in same-different procedure (visual duration discrimina­ tion) // Proceedings of the 1 Oth Annual Meeting of Inter­ national Society for Psychophysics / Ed. L. Ward. Van­ couver, 1994. P. 208—219.
 38. Skotnikova LG. Calibration of confidence in different sensory tasks // Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics / Ed.
 C. Bonnet. Strasbourg, 2000. P. 327-332.
 39. Skotnikova I.G., Rammsayer T., Brandler S. Confidence
 judgments in visual temporal discrimination: cross-cul­ tural study //Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Leipzig, 2001.
 40. Stankov L. Calibraton curves, scatterplotts and the dis­ tinction between general knowledge and perceptual tasks I I Learning and Individual Differences. 1998.
 V. 10. P. 29-50.
 41. Usher M., Zakai D. A neural network model for at­ tribute-based decision processes // Cognitive science. 1993. V. 17. P. 349-396.
 42. Vickers D., Lee M.D. Dynamic models of simple judg­ ments: I. Properties of a self-regulating accumulator model Ts Nonlinear dynamics, psychology and life sci­ ences. 1998. V. 2. P. 169-194.
 43. Yates J. External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability score // Organizational Behaviour and Human Performance. 1982. V. 30. P. 132-156.