Везде
“Incompressibility” of psychological reality and diversity of psychological approaches
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
“Incompressibility” of psychological reality and diversity of psychological approaches
Annotation
PII
S0205959225010144-1
DOI
10.31857/S0205959225010144
Publication type
Review
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksandr N. Poddiakov 
ORCID: 0000-0001-6793-9985
Occupation: ScD (Psychology), Professor
Affiliation:
HSE University
Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), School of Anthropology of the Future, RANEPA

Edition
Volume 46 Issue number 1
Pages
123-126
Abstract
The collective monograph “Scientific Approaches in Modern Russian Psychology” (Moscow, 2023) is discussed. To substantiate the need to combine various psychological approaches, the reviewer uses the metaphor of the “incompressibility” of psychological reality (by analogy with the metaphor of the “incompressibility” of biological reality by L. Abbott). A debatable judgment is expressed that one of the grounds for the consolidation of psychologists can be their negative identification through the opposition of: (a) psychology of agency, and (b) neurobiological reductionism. The concept of culture is a positive basis for the consolidation (but also of discussions) for a significant part of psychologists and specialists in other fields. At the same time, it is important to discuss not only its developmental, but also depriving functions. The organic combination of psychological approaches can be hindered by the affective-value polarization of researchers as individuals with significantly different worldviews. It is concluded that the monograph accumulates the efforts of a number of leading Russian scientists and deserves careful reading and study, and parts of its content can be included in anthologies and courses on the methodological foundations of psychology.
Keywords
методология психологии научные подходы принципы сравнения
Received
16.04.2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
21
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Гусельцева М.С. Обзор статьи Larry Abbott & Rocco Gaudenzi “Theoretical Physics and Theoretical Neuroscience: What Each Can Learn from the Other” // Новые психологические исследования. 2024. № 4. С. 220–228.

2. Журавлев А.Л., Сергиенко Е.А. Современные подходы в отечественной психологии: единство в разнообразии // Психологический журнал. 2024. Т. 45. № 4. С. 114–128.

3. Научные подходы в современной отечественной психологии / Отв. ред. А.Л. Журавлев, Е.А. Сергиенко, Г.А. Виленская. М.: Изд-во “Институт психологии РАН”, 2023.

4. Поддьяков А.Н. Развитие исследовательской инициативности в детском возрасте. Дисс. ... д. пс. н. М., 2001.

5. Поддьяков А.Н., Грудинин В.А. Противодействие обучению других и их “троянское” обучение: цифровые технологии в социальных практиках и исследованиях // Образовательная политика. 2024. Т. 3. № 99. С. 32–41.

6. Советская психология: этап истории науки и менталитет / Отв. ред. А.Л. Журавлев, Д.В. Ушаков, А.В. Юревич. М.: Изд-во “Институт психологии РАН”, 2024.

7. Poddiakov A. Possibilities of free will in different physical, social, and technological worlds: an introduction to a thematic issue // Integrative psychological and behavioral science. 2024. V. 58. P. 884–893.

8. Valsiner J. Culture and human development. London: Sage, 2000.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate