Везде

RAS Social ScienceПсихологический журнал Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9592
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-588X

LIFE ORIENTATIONS AND DOMINANT STATE OF MEMBERS OF POST-GUARDIAN FAMILIES

You can
PII
S3034588XS0205959225030061-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034588X25030061
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena Korjova
  • Occupation: ScD. (Psychology), Professor of the Department of General and Social Psychology at the Institute of Psychology
  • Affiliation: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University
O. N. Tuzova
  • Occupation: PhD. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Psychology
  • Affiliation: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University
Aliia Karasaeva
  • Occupation: Assistant Professor at the Department of General and Social Psychology at the Institute of Psychology
  • Affiliation: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University
Anastasiнa Povkhova
  • Occupation: Laboratory researcher
  • Affiliation: A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University
Volume/ Edition
Volume 46 / Issue number 3
Pages
60-72
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the features of life orientations and the dominant psycho-emotional state of members of post-guardian families. 240 respondents participated in the study: the main group included 40 post-guardian families (of which 40 were post-guardian and 40 were aged 18-25 years). The comparison groups were guardian families who are in the period of guardianship and post-guardianship: There are 40 guardian families with children from 7 to 11 years old and 40 guardian families with children from 12 to 17 years old. The following methods were used: the questionnaire of life orientations (E.Yu. Korzhova), the “Dominant state” technique (L.V. Kulikov). Descriptive statistics methods, the Mann-Whitney criterion, the Fisher criterion, and Spearman correlation analysis were used for qualitative and quantitative data processing to identify the relationship between life orientations and dominant status in post-refugee families. The statistical package STATISTICA 10 was used to process the statistical data. The predominant type of subject-object orientations in guardian families is the “consumer of a life situation”. The relationship between life orientations and dominant states in post-guardian families has been established. Post-guardians with an active lifestyle, willingness to change, and a high level of subjective control over life situations have higher levels of cheerfulness, vitality, calmness, and stability of emotional tone, as well as more self-confidence. Students with a focus on mastering the inner world have a greater activity in relation to the life situation and a stable emotional background. Those who strive for familiar situations are more likely to demonstrate cheerfulness, calmness and relaxation.
Keywords
постопекунские семьи постопекаемые постопекуны дети-сироты опекунская семья опекуны опекаемые
Date of publication
15.11.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
8

References

  1. 1. Алдашева А.А., Зеленова М.Е., Сиваш О.Н. Социально-перцептивный образ приемного ребенка у замещающих родителей с разной формой опеки // Социальная психология и общество. 2021. Т. 12. № 2. С. 110-128. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2021120207.
  2. 2. Брецких Е.А. Исследование клинико-психологических особенностей семей, ожидающих или имеющих приемных детей (в связи с задачами аналитико-системного семейного психологического сопровождения) // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. 2009. № 102. С. 341-348.
  3. 3. Вагапова А.Р., Маркелова А.Ю. Особенности родительской позиции в семьях разного типа // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Сер. Акмеология образования. Психология развития. 2018. Т. 7. № 2. С. 170-175. DOI: 10.18500/23049790-2018-7-2-170-175.
  4. 4. Коржова Е.Ю., Тузова О.Н., Карасаева А.М., Повхова А.В. Жизненная ситуация постопеки в субъективных оценках членов кровнородственных семей // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. 2024. Т. 14. № 2. С. 241-259.
  5. 5. Коржова Е.Ю., Волкова Е.Н., Микляева А.В., Безгодова С.А., Юркова Е.В. Событийная наполненность жизненной перспективы опекунов как характеристика отношений в семьях кровной и некровной опеки // Социальная психология и общество. 2020. Т. 11. № 3. С. 86-98. DOI:10.17759/sps.2020110306.
  6. 6. Коржова Е.Ю. Психология жизненных ориентаций человека. СПб.: Изд-во РХГА, 2006. 384 с.
  7. 7. Куликов Л.В. Руководство к методикам диагностики психических состояний, чувств и психологической устойчивости личности. Описание методик, инструкции по применению. СПб: СПбГУ, 2003. 183 с.
  8. 8. Махнач А.В. Тенденции в изучении семьи и характеристик состава, связанных с ее жизнеспособностью // Вестник РГГУ. Сер.: Психология. Педагогика. Образование. 2019. № 2. С. 37-50. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6398-2019-2-37-50.
  9. 9. Ослон В.Н. Проблемы сиротства в России: социально-исторический и психологический аспекты // Семейная психология и семейная терапия. 2001. № 11. С. 5-36.
  10. 10. Психология опекунской семьи: ситуационный подход / Е.Ю. Коржова, С.А. Безгодова, А.В. Микляева, Е.В. Юркова. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2020. 248 с.
  11. 11. Шульга Т.И., Антипина М.А. Эмоциональная среда замещающей семьи, принявшей на воспитание подростков, оставшихся без попечения родителей // Психологическая наука и образование. 2018. Т. 23. № 5. С. 51-66. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230506.
  12. 12. Chateauneuf D., Turcotte D., Drapeau S. The relationship between foster care families and birth families in a child welfare context: The determining factors // Child and Family Social Work. 2018. V. 23. P. 71-79. DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12385.
  13. 13. Chisolm A., Morris T.L. Psychological Adjustment of Children in Foster Care: Review and Implications for Best Practice // Journal of Public Child Welfare. 2012. V. 6. № 2. DOI: 10.1080/15548732.2011.617272.
  14. 14. Gillis-Arnold R., Crase S.J., Stockdale D.F., Shelley M.C. Parenting attitudes, foster parenting attitudes, and motivations of adoptive and nonadoptive foster parent trainees // Children and Youth Services Review. 1998. V. 20 (8). P. 715-732. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-7409(98)00033-4.
  15. 15. Grotevant H.D., Rueter M., Von Korff L., Gonzalez C. Post-adoption contact, adoption communicative openness, and satisfaction with contact as predictors of externalizing behavior in adolescence and emerging adulthood // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2010. V. 52. № 5. P. 529-536. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02330.x.
  16. 16. Labella M.H., Lind T., Sellers T., Roben C., Dozier M. Emotion regulation among children in foster care versus birth parent care: differential effects of an early home-visiting intervention // Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2020. V. 48(8) P. 995-1006. DOI: 10.1007/s10802-020-00653-4.
  17. 17. Orme J.G., Buehler C. Foster Family Characteristics and Behavioral and Emotional Problems of Foster Children: A Narrative Review // Family Relations. 2001. V. 50. P. 3-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00003.x.
  18. 18. Selwyn J. Post-adoption support and interventions for adoptive families: Best practice approaches. Munich, Germany: Deutsche Jugendinstitut, 2017. 54 p.
  19. 19. Skrallan D.M., Johan V., Marijke R., Femke V., Frank V.H. Foster parents’ coping style and attitudes toward parenting // Children and Youth Services Review. 2015. V. 53. P. 70-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library