Везде

RAS Social ScienceПсихологический журнал Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9592
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-588X

UNIVERSAL FACTORS OF CREATIVE THINKING AND CREATIVE PERSONALITY: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH

You can
PII
S3034588XS0205959225040046-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034588X25040046
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V. G. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya
  • Occupation: ScD (Psychology), Professor, Head of the Laboratory “Psychology and Psychophysiology of Stress Resistance and Creativity”, Professor of the Department of Psychology of Management and Law Enforcement Activities
  • Affiliation: South Ural State University (National Research University)
Yu. A. Dmitrieva
  • Occupation: PhD (Psychology), Senior Researcher at the Laboratory “Psychology and Psychophysiology of Stress Resistance and Creativity”, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology of Management and Law Enforcement Activities
  • Affiliation: South Ural State University (National Research University)
S. Yu. Korobova
  • Occupation: PhD (Psychology), Researcher at the Laboratory “Psychology and Psychophysiology of Stress Resistance and Creativity”, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology of Management and Law Enforcement Activities
  • Affiliation: South Ural State University (National Research University)
V. A. Glukhova
  • Occupation: PhD (Psychology), Senior Researcher at the Laboratory “Psychology and Psychophysiology of Stress Resistance and Creativity”
  • Affiliation: South Ural State University (National Research University)
Volume/ Edition
Volume 46 / Issue number 4
Pages
36-48
Abstract
Modern culture is developing in the direction of increasing diversity, complexity and uncertainty; in these conditions, the success of adaptation and pre-adaptation of subjects and communities presupposes the support of individual uniqueness, the value of creative self-expression and mass creativity. The studies of creativity are analyzed, highlighting the importance of identifying universal and specific elements in various spheres and levels of creativity, studying the individual uniqueness of cognitive and personal resources of creativity, and their contribution to the subjects’ achievements; variants of integrative and differential psychological approaches to the task are considered. Purpose of the study. The research is aimed to substantiate a typologically focused integrative approach to the study of creativity: to identify universal factors of creative thinking and universal factors of creative personality, taking into account the ratio of innovational and adaptational parameters as a basis for type differentiation; to identify variants of subsequent integration (within types) for universal and specific sociocultural resources of the subjects’ creativity. Results of the study. Based on an analysis of creativity studies across different age, professional, and cultural samples, universal factors of creative thinking (fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration) and universal factors of creative personality (openness to experience, extraversion, intrinsic motivation, reflection) have been identified. The studies have also identified higher-order factors: structural components of innovational and adaptational factors are considered as the basis for differentiating creativity types. Based on an analysis of integrative approaches to the study of creative thinking and creative personality, variants of integration between universal and specific sociocultural and metacognitive characteristics that determine the specificity of studied age, professional, and cultural samples have been identified. A typologically focused integrative approach is substantiated, which includes: determining the parameters for differentiating creativity types based on an analysis of universal creativity factors of subjects; determining variants of integration between universal and specific sociocultural parameters based on an analysis of specific sociocultural resources of subjects. The typologically focused integrative approach is aimed to identify the resources of mass creativity of subjects in various spheres of professional activity and everyday life, as well as individual resources for the development of creative giftedness.
Keywords
креативное мышление креативная личность факторы креативного мышления интегративный подход социокультурная идентичность типы креативности
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
11

References

  1. 1. Асмолов А.Г. Психология современности: вызовы неопределенности, сложности, разнообразия // Mobilis in mobile: личность в эпоху перемен / Под общ. ред. А. Асмолова. М.: ЯСК, 2019. С. 13–29.
  2. 2. Асмолов А.Г., Шехтер Е.Д., Черноризов А.М. В начале была энергия: являются ли различия двигателем эволюции // Вопросы психологии. 2024. Т. 69. № 3. С. 1–20.
  3. 3. Белова С.С. Креативность и управляющие функции: обзор зарубежных дифференциально-психологических исследований // Современная зарубежная психология. 2021. Т. 10. № 4. С. 44–54.
  4. 4. Вечерин А.В., Яголковский С.Р. Искусственный интеллект в оценивании и развитии креативности // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2024. Т. 21. № 4. С. 787–799.
  5. 5. Голдстайн Д., Крегер О. Творческая личность: как использовать сильные стороны своего характера для развития креативности. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2014. 416 с.
  6. 6. Грязева-Добшинская В.Г. Культурный дифференциал креативности: теоретические основания исследований творчества субъектов в динамичной культуре // Психология. Психофизиология. 2024. Т. 17. № 4. С. 34–49.
  7. 7. Грязева-Добшинская В.Г. Синергия взаимодействия субъектов в совместной творческой деятельности как механизм творческого лидерства // Психология интеллекта и творчества / Под ред. А.Л. Журавлева, М.А. Холодной, Д.В. Ушакова, Т.В. Галкиной. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2010. С. 298–309.
  8. 8. Грязева-Добшинская В.Г., Дмитриева Ю.А. Баланс тенденций активности менеджеров: факторно-аналитическое исследование ресурсов инновационного лидерства // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия “Психология”. 2016. Т. 9. № 1. С.103–108.
  9. 9. Грязева-Добшинская В.Г., Дмитриева Ю.А., Коробова  С.Ю., Глухова В.А. Личностные ресурсы и барьеры инновационного лидерства менеджеров: структурные аспекты мотивации, стиля лидерства, социальной идентичности // Организационная психология. 2023. Т. 13. № 3. С. 9–28.
  10. 10. Инглхарт Р. Культурная эволюция. Как изменяется человеческая мотивация и как это меняет мир. М.: Мысль, 2018. 334 с.
  11. 11. Петрова С.О. Методология и методы изучения одаренности в современных российских психологических исследованиях // Вопросы психологии. 2019. № 4. С. 78–88.
  12. 12. Петровский В.А. Человек над ситуацией. 2-е изд. М.: Смысл, 2021. 559 с.
  13. 13. Ушаков Д.В. На пути к целостному видению человека // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2020. Т. 17. № 4. С. 617–629.
  14. 14. Ушаков Д.В. Творчество как источник общественного прогресса. Творчество — общесистемный взгляд // Творчество: от биологических оснований к социальным и культурным феноменам / Под ред. Д.В. Ушакова. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2011. С. 13–32.
  15. 15. Флорида Р. Креативный класс. Люди, которые создают будущее. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер, 2016. 384 с.
  16. 16. Чиксентмихайи М. Креативность. Поток и психология открытий и изобретений. М.: Карьера Пресс, 2013. 528 с.
  17. 17. Шумакова Н.Б. Творческий потенциал и его измерение в современных зарубежных исследованиях // Современная зарубежная психология. 2021. Т. 10. № 4. C. 8–16.
  18. 18. Щебланова Е.И. Исследовательские методологии и методы изучения креативности в отечественной психологии // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2018. Т. 11. № 4. С. 39–53.
  19. 19. Adair W.L., Xiong T.X. How Chinese and Caucasian Canadians conceptualize creativity: Тhe mediating role of uncertainty avoidance // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2018. V. 49. № 2. P. 223–238.
  20. 20. Amabile T.M. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.
  21. 21. Baer J. Domain Specificity of Creativity. Lawrenceville, N.J.: Rider University, 2015.
  22. 22. Baer J., Kaufman J.C. Bridging generality and specificity: Тhe amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity // Roeper Review. 2005. V. 27. P. 158–163.
  23. 23. Barbot B., Besancon M., Lubart T. The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC // Learning and Individual Differences. 2016. V. 2. Р. 178–187.
  24. 24. Cabra J.F., Guerrero C.D. Regional creativity: Cultural and socio-economic differences // Journal of Creativity (Online). 2022. V. 32. № 2. Art. 100022.
  25. 25. Campos H.M., Rubio A.M., Atondo G.H., Chorres Y.M.P. Relationship between creativity, personality and entrepreneurship: An exploratory study // International Business Research. 2015. V. 8. № 8. P. 59–71.
  26. 26. Citko K. Creativity as the Act of Transcending Oneself and the World: from Creativity to Transcendence // Creativity. Theories — Research — Applications. 2020. V. 6. № 2. P. 264–268.
  27. 27. Corazza G.E., Glăveanu V.P. Potential in Creativity: Individual, social, material perspectives, and a dynamic integrative framework // Creativity Research Journal. 2020. V. 32. № 1. P. 81–91.
  28. 28. Cramond B., Kim K.H. The role of creativity tools and measures in assessing potential and growth // Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students / Ed. J. VanTassel-Baska. N.Y.: Routledge, 2021.
  29. 29. De Vries H., Lubart T. Scientific creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture // Journal of Creative Behavior. 2017. V. 53. № 2. P. 145–155.
  30. 30. DeYoung C.G. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006. V. 91. № 6. P. 1138–1151.
  31. 31. Digman J.M. Higher-order factors of the Big Five // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. V. 73. P. 1246–1256.
  32. 32. Erez M., Nouri R. Creativity: The influence of cultural, social, and work contexts // Management and Organization Review. 2010. V. 6. № 3. P. 351–370.
  33. 33. Feist G.J. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998. V. 2. № 4. P. 290–309.
  34. 34. Fürst G., Ghisletta P., Lubart T. Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: Еheoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing // Journal of Creative Behavior. 2014. V. 50. № 2. P. 87–108.
  35. 35. Glăveanu V.P. Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework // Review of General Psychology. 2013. V. 17. № 1. P. 69–81.
  36. 36. Glaveanu V.P., Hanson M.A., Baer J. et al. Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio‐cultural manifesto // Journal of Creative Behavior. 2020. V. 54. № 3. P. 741–745.
  37. 37. Glăveanu V.P., Ness I.J., de Saint Laurent C. New frontiers in creativity, learning, and technology research // Creati-vity. Theories – Research – Applications. 2021. V. 8. №1. P. 5–10.
  38. 38. Glăveanu V.P., Tanggaard L. Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity // New Ideas in Psychology. 2014. V. 34. P. 12–21.
  39. 39. Gocłowska M.A., Crisp R.J. How dual-identity processes foster creativity // Review of General Psychology. 2014. V. 18. № 3. P. 216–236.
  40. 40. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya V.G., Dmitrieva Y.A., Korobova  S.Y., Glukhova, V.A. Children’s creativity and personal adaptation resources // Behavioral Sciences. 2020. V. 10. № 2. Art. 49.
  41. 41. Karwowski M. Culture and psychometric studies of creativity // The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research / Ed. V.P. Glăveanu. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
  42. 42. Karwowski M. The dynamics of creative self-concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity // Creativity Research Journal. 2016. V. 28. № 1. P. 99–104.
  43. 43. Kaufman S.B., Quilty L.C., Grazioplene R.G., Hirsh J.B., Gray J.R., Peterson J.B., DeYoung C.G. Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences // Journal of Personality. 2015. V. 4. P. 1–12.
  44. 44. Kaufman J.C., Beghetto R.A. Where is the when of creativity? Specifying the temporal dimension of the Four Cs of Creativity // Review of General Psychology. 2023. V. 27. № 2. P. 194–205.
  45. 45. Kharkhurin A.V. Creativity. 4 in 1: Four-criterion construct of creativity // Creativity Research Journal. 2014. V. 26. № 3. P. 338–352.
  46. 46. Kim K.H., Pierce R.A. Adaptive creativity and innovative creativity // Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship / Ed. E.G. Carayannis. N.Y.: Springer. 2013. P. 35–40.
  47. 47. Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976. V. 61. № 5. P. 622–629.
  48. 48. Krumm G., Lemos V., Filippetti V.A. Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Figural Form B in Spanish-speaking children: Measurement invariance across gender // Creativity Research Journal. 2014. V. 26. № 1. P. 72–81.
  49. 49. Lebedeva N., Schwartz S.H., Van De Vijver F.J., Plucker  J., Bushina E. Domains of everyday creativity and personal values // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. V. 9. Art. 2681.
  50. 50. Lubart T. The 7 C’s of creativity // Journal of Creative Behavior. 2017. V. 51. №4. P. 293–296.
  51. 51. Lubart T., Barbot B., Besancon M. Creative potential: assessment issues and the EPoC Battery // Estudios de Psicologia. 2019. V. 40. № 3. P. 1–23.
  52. 52. Lubart T., Kharkhurin A.V., Corazza G.E. et al. Creative potential in science: Conceptual and measurement issues // Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. V. 13. Art. 750224.
  53. 53. Montuori A., Donnelly G. The changing face of creativity // Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.: Academy of Management, 2019.
  54. 54. Nogueira S.I., Almeida L.S., Lima T.S. Two tracks of thought: A structural model of the Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP) // Creativity Research Journal. 2017. V. 29. № 2. P. 206–211.
  55. 55. Puryear J.S., Kettler T., Rinn A.N. Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: A systematic review // Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 2017. V. 11. № 1. P. 59–68.
  56. 56. Shao Y., Zhang C., Zhou J., Gu T., Yuan Y. How does culture shape creativity? A mini-review // Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. V. 10. Art. 1219.
  57. 57. Simonton D.K. Scientific creativity: Discovery and invention as combinatorial // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. V. 12. Art. 721104.
  58. 58. Simonton D.K. Creativity: Cognitive, developmental, personal, and social aspects // American Psychologist. 2000. V. 55. P. 151–158.
  59. 59. Sternberg R.J., Lubart T.I. An investment theory of creativity and its development // Human Development. 1991. V.34. P. 1–32.
  60. 60. Sung S.Y., Choi J.N. Do Big Five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation // Social Behavior and Personality. 2009. V. 37. № 7. P. 941–956.
  61. 61. Taylor C.L., Kaufman J.C. The creative trait motivation scales // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2021. V. 39. Art. 100763.
  62. 62. Torrance E.P. The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Norms-Technical Manual Figural (Streamlined) Forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, 2008.
  63. 63. Tromp C., Sternberg R.J. Dynamic creativity: A Person × Task × Situation interaction framework // The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2022. V. 56. №. 4. P. 553–565.
  64. 64. Urban M, Urban K. Orientation toward intrinsic motivation mediates the relationship between metacognition and creativity // The Journal of Creative Behavior. 2023. V. 57. № 1. P. 6–16.
  65. 65. Xie G., Paik Y. Cultural differences in creativity and innovation: Are Asian employees truly less creative than western employees? // Asia Pacific Business Review. 2018. V. 25. № 1. P. 123–147.
  66. 66. Yoon C.H. A validation study of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking with a sample of Korean elementary school students // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2017. V. 26. P. 38–50.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library