Везде
УПРАВЛЕНИЕ СОВМЕСТНОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬЮ: НОВЫЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ В ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ПСИХОЛОГИИ
Оглавление
Аннотация Оценить Содержание публикации
Библиография Комментарии
Поделиться
QR
Метрика
УПРАВЛЕНИЕ СОВМЕСТНОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬЮ: НОВЫЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ В ЗАРУБЕЖНОЙ ПСИХОЛОГИИ
Аннотация
Код статьи
S0205-95920000617-5-1
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
ЖУРАВЛЕВ АНАТОЛИЙ ЛАКТИОНОВИЧ  Нестик Т. А.
Аннотация
Проведен анализ исследований управления совместной деятельностью в зарубежной социальной психологии. Выделены пять основных теоретических парадигм в изучении совместной деятельности (структурная, социокультурная, сетевая, эмоциональная, когнитивная). Особое внимание уделено исследованиям совместного творчества и совместной деятельности в условиях высокой неопределенности и дефицита времени. Намечены наиболее перспективные направления дальнейших исследований.
Классификатор
Дата публикации
03.07.2009
Всего подписок
0
Всего просмотров
649
Оценка читателей
0.0 (0 голосов)
Цитировать   Скачать pdf

Библиография



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

    

  1. Журавлев А.Л. Психология совместной деятельности. М.: ИП РАН, 2005.     
    2. 

  2. Нестик Т.А. Исследования совместной деятельности в современной зарубежной социальной психологии//Журавлев А.Л. Психология совместной деятельности. М.: ИП РАН, 2005. С. 37-86.
    3. 

  3. Нестик Т.А. Психологические аспекты управления знаниями//Управление интеллектуальными ресурсами организации/Под ред. Б.З. Мильнера. М., 2009.
    4. 

  4. Нестик Т.А. Развитие культуры обмена знаниями через социальные сети//Методические и аналитические материалы комитета ТПП РФ по деловой этике. М.: ТПП РФ, 2006. С. 133-145.
    5. 

  5. Нестик Т.А. Социальный капитал организации: социально-психологический анализ//Психол. журн. 2009. № 1-2.
    6. 

  6. Ошанин Д.А. Деятельность оператора в условиях дефицита времени//Инженерная психология. Теория, методология, практическое применение. М., 1977. С. 200-202.
    7. 

  7. Шейн Э. Организационная культура и лидерство. СПб.: Питер, 2003.
    8. 

  8. Amabile T.M. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996.
    9. 

  9. Barry Bruce, Steward Greg L. Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-Managed Groups: The Role of Personality//Journ. of Applied Psychology. 1997. V. 82. Р. 62-78.
    10. 

  10. Barsade S.G., Ward A.J., Turner J.D.F., Sonnenfeld J. To your heart"s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams//Administrative Science Quarterly. 2000. 45. Р. 802-836.
    11. 

  11. Brophy D.R. Understanding, measuring, and enhancing collective creative problem-solving efforts//Creativity Research Journ. 1998. 11. Р. 199-229.
    12. 

  12. Burt R.S. The Social Capital of Opinion Leaders//Annals. 1999. № 566. Р. 37-54.
    13. 

  13. Carnevale P.J., Probst T.M. Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998. 74. Р. 1300-1309.
    14. 

  14. Clark K.D. Network Structures and Teamwork//International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working/Eds. by M.A. West, D. Tjosvold and K.G. Smith. Chichester, UK: John Wiley, 2004. Р. 423-442.
    15. 

  15. Collins M.A., Amabile T.M. Motivation and creativity//Handbook of creativity/Ed. R.J. Sternberg. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. 1999. Р. 297-312.
    16. 

  16. Cross R., Prusak L. The People Who Make Organizations Go or Stop//Harvard Business Review. 2002. V. 80. № 6. Р. 104-112.  
    17. 

  17. Deal T.E., Kennedy A. Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1982.
    18. 

  18. Den Hartog D.N., House R.J., Hanges P.J. et al. Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?//Leadership Quarterly. 1999. 10. Р. 219-256.
    19. 

  19. Diehl M., Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. 53. Р. 497-509.
    20. 

  20. Feyerherm A.E., Rice C.L. Emotional intelligence and team performance: The good, the bad and the ugly//International Journ. of Organizational Analysis. 2002. V. 10. Issue 4. Р. 343-362.
    21. 

  21. George J.M. Group affective tone//Handbook of work group psychology/Ed. M.A. West. Chichester: John Wiley, 1996. Р. 77-94.
    22. 

  22. Gevers J.M.P., van Eerde W., Rutte Chr. G. Time pressure, potency, and progress in project groups//European Journ. of group and organizational psychology. 2001. V. 10 (2). Р. 205-221.
    23. 

  23. Goleman D. What makes a leader?//Harvard Business Review. 1998. November-December. Р. 93-102.
    24. 

  24. Goleman D., Boyatzis R., McKee A. Primal leadership. Learning to lead with emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
    25. 

  25. Gruenfeld D.H., Mannix E.A., Williams K.Y., Neale M.A. Group composition and decisionmaking: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance//Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1996. 67. Р. 1-15.
    26. 

  26. Guzzo R.A., Dickson M.W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness//Annual Review of Psychology. 1996. 47. Р. 307-338.
    27. 

  27. Haslam A. Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2000.
    28. 

  28. Hatfield E., Cacippo J.T., Rapson R. Emotional Contagion. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
    29. 

  29. Hayes R.A., W.J. Abernathy. Managing Our Way to Economic Decline//Harvard Business Review. 1980. July-August. Р. 67-77.
    30. 

  30. Hinsz V.B. Cognitive and consensus processes in group recognition: Memory performance//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. V. 59. Р. 705-718.
    31. 

  31. Hogg M.A., Hardie E.A., Reynolds K.J. Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness//European Journ. of Social Psychology. 1995. 25. Р. 159-177.
    32. 

  32. House R.J. Leadership in the 21st century: A speculative enquiry//The changing nature of work/Ed. A. Howard. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1995.
    33. 

  33. House R.J., Wright N.S., Aditya R.N. Cross-cultural research on organizational leadership: A critical analysis and a proposed theory//New perspectives in international organizational psychology/Eds. P.C. Early, M. Erez. San Francisco: New Lexington. 1997. Р. 535-625.
    34. 

  34. Huxham C. Theorizing collaboration practice//Public Management Review. 2003. V. 5. Issue 3. Р. 401-423.
    35. 

  35. James K. Goal conflict and originality of thinking//Creativity Research Journ. 1995. 8. Р. 285-290.
    36. 

  36. Jehn K.A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups//Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997. 42. Р. 530-557.
    37. 

  37. Jordan P.J., Troth A.C. Managing Emotions During Team Problem Solving//Human Performance. 2004. V. 17. Issue 2. Р. 195-218.
    38. 

  38. Kalish Yu. Bridging in social networks: Who are the people in structural holes and why are they there?//Asian Journ. of Social Psychology. 2008. V. 11. Issue 1. Р. 53-66.
    39. 

  39. Karau S.J., Kelly J.R. The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process//Journ. of Experiential Social Psychology. 1992. 28(6). Р. 542-571.
    40. 

  40. Kelly J.R. Mood and emotion in groups//Group Processes. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology/Ed. M.A. Hogg, S. Tindale. L.: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Р. 164-181.
    41. 

  41. Kelly J.R., Futoran G.C., McGrath J.E. Capacity and capability: seven studies of entrainment of task performance rates//Small Group Research. 1990. 21(3). Р. 283-314.
    42. 

  42. Kelly J.R., Karau S.J. Entrainment of creativity in small groups//Small Group Research. 1993. 24(2). Р. 179-198.                  
    43. 

  43. Kelly J.R., Karau S.J. Group Decision Making: The Effect of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999. V. 25. № 11. Р. 1342-1354.
    44. 

  44. Kerr N.L., Tindale R.S. Group performance and decision making//Annual Review of Psychology. 2004. V. 55. Р. 623-655.
    45. 

  45. Kirton M. Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity an problem-solving. N.Y.: Routledge, 1989.
    46. 

  46. Kruglanski A.W., Webster D.M. Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing”//Psychological Review. 1996. 103(2). Р. 263-283.
    47. 

  47. Kurtzberg T.R. Feeling Creative, Being Creative: An Empirical Study of Diversity and Creativity in Teams//Creativity Research Journ. 2005. V. 17. Issue 1. Р. 51-65.
    48. 

  48. Kurtzberg T.R., Amabile T.M. From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity//Creativity Research Journ. 2000-2001. V. 13. № 3-4. Р. 285-294.
    49. 

  49. Lord R., Maher K.J. Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Unwin-Everyman, 1991
    50. 

  50. Maier C.W., Prange C., von Rosenstiel L. Psychological Perspectives of Organizational Learning//Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge/Eds. M. Dierkes, A.B. Antal, J. Child, I. Nonaka. Oxford, 2001. Р. 14-34.
    51. 

  51. McGuire M. Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It//Public Administration Review. 2002. V. 62. № 5. Р. 599-609.
    52. 

  52. McIntosh D.N., Druckman D., Zajonc R.B. Socially induced affect//Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance/Eds. D. Druckman, R. Bjork, R. Washington, DC, 1994. Р. 251-276.
    53. 

  53. Nemeth C.J. Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments//Social Cognition. 1995. 13. Р. 273-291.
    54. 

  54. Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation//How Organizations Learn. Managing the Search for Knowledge/Eds. K. Starkey, S. Tempest, A. McKinlay. 2-nd ed. L.: Thomson, 2004. Р. 165-201.
    55. 

  55. Pelled L.H. Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory//Organization Science. 1996. 6. Р. 207-229.
    56. 

  56. Peters T., Waterman R. In search of excellence. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1982.
    57. 

  57. Pierro A., Mannetti L., De Grada E. et al. Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure//Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2003. 29(3). Р. 405-417.
    58. 

  58. Prichard J.S., Stanton N.A. Testing Belbin"s team role theory of effective groups//Journ. of Management Development. 1999. V. 18. Issue 7/8, Р. 652-665.
    59. 

  59. Ridgeway C.L. Social Status and Group Structure//Group Processes. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology/Eds. M.A. Hogg, S. Tindale. L.: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. Р. 352-375.
    60. 

  60. Sadler P. Leadership and Organizational Learning//Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge/Eds. M. Dierkes, A.B. Antal, J. Child, I. Nonaka. Oxford, 2001. Р. 415-427.
    61. 

  61. Sapsed J., Bessant J., Partington D. et al. Teamworking and knowledgemanagement: a review of converging themes//International Journ. of Management Reviews. 2002. V. 4. Issue 1. Р. 71-85.
    62. 

  62. Senior B. Team roles and team performance: Is there really a link?//Journ. of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1997. V. 70. Р. 241-258.
    63. 

  63. Sinclair R.C., Mark M.M. The influence of mood state on judgment and action//The Construction of Social Judgments/Eds. M.M. Martin, A. Tesser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992. Р. 165-193.
    64. 

  64. Smith E.R, Murphy J., Coats S. Attachment to groups: theory and measurement//Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. 77. Р. 94-110.
    65. 

  65. Tyler T.R. Why people cooperate with organizations: an identity-based perspective//Research in Organizational Behavior. 1999. V. 21. Р. 201-245.
    66. 

  66. Weiss H.M., Cropanzano K. Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work//Research in Organizational Behavior. 1996. V. 18. Р. 1-74.
    67. 

  67. Wenger E.C., Snyder W.M. Communities of Practice: the Organizational Frontier//Harvard Business Review. January-February. 2000. Р. 139-145.
    68.

Комментарии

Сообщения не найдены

Написать отзыв
Перевести